Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 134, Issue 2, pp 473–509 | Cite as

Have Your Cake and Eat it Too: The Well-Being of the Italians (1861–2011)

  • Mariateresa Ciommi
  • Andrea Gentili
  • Barbara Ermini
  • Chiara Gigliarano
  • Francesco M. Chelli
  • Mauro Gallegati
Article

Abstract

As a part of the international debate on Beyond the GDP, this paper describes the temporal trend of the multidimensional well-being of the Italians from 1861 to 2011. Building on the CNEL and ISTAT’s Equitable and Sustainable Well-being (Benessere Equo e Sostenibile, BES) project, the paper selects 41 indicators that are grouped into eight dimensions characterizing the most important aspects of everyday life: health, education, work, economic well-being, political participation, security, environment and research and development. In order to synthesize the information provided by this large set of indicators, a composite index for each dimension is tracked over the time span of 150 years. The main contributions of this paper consist in providing an analysis of the Italian BES over such a long period. As a result, the eight domains exhibit temporal tendencies that are different from the one of economic well-being. In particular, health, education, work and political participation show a pattern increasing over time (analogously to economic well-being), although at different growth rates, while an overall declining path emerges for the domains of security, environment and research and development. Moreover, we identify four main periods of the Italian history (before WWI, the Fascist period, the years from 1950 to 1990 and the most recent period) each characterized by different relations among the well-being domains.

Keywords

Italian economic history Well-being Adjusted Mazziotta-Pareto index BES 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Giorgio Alleva, Leonardo Becchetti, Enrico Giovannini, Filomena Maggino, Matteo Mazziotta, Fabiola Riccardini, Lucia Vergano and Stefano Zamagni for their helpful comments and suggestions. We are also grateful to the participants at the 52-th Meeting of the Italian Society of Economics, Demography and Statistics (SIEDS) held in Ancona Fermo in May 2015 and to the participants at the AIQUAV Conference held in Florence in December 2015 for their interesting comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. Finally, we would also like to express our sincere thanks to the Editor and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. This research was encouraged under the E-Frame project (SSH.201162-1). The general disclaimer applies.

Supplementary material

11205_2016_1450_MOESM1_ESM.docx (127 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 127 kb)

References

  1. Afsa, C., Blanchet, D., Marcus, V., Pionnier, P. A., & Rioux, L. (2008). Survey of existing approaches to measuring socio-economic progress, study prepared for commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress, INSEE. http://www.insee.fr/fr/publications-et-services/dossiers_web/stiglitz/doc-commission/Survey_of_Existing_Approaches_to_Measuring_Socio-Economic_Progress.pdf
  2. Baffigi, A. (2011). Italian National Accounts, 1861–2011. Economic History Working Papers N. 18, Rome: Bank of Italy. Google Scholar
  3. Baffigi, A. (2015). Il PIL per la storia d’Italia. Venice: Istruzioni per l’uso, Marsilio Editori.Google Scholar
  4. Bai, J., & Perron, P. (1998). Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica, 47–78.Google Scholar
  5. Bai, J., & Perron, P. (2003). Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banca d’Italia. Historical Series of the Bank of Italy. https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/collana-storica/index.html
  7. Bleys, B. (2012). Beyond GDP: Classifying alternative measures for progress. Social Indicators Research, 109(3), 355–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boarini, R., Johansson, A., & Mira d’Ercole, M. (2006). “Alternative measures of well-being”, OECD Social, employment and migration Working Paper, n 33.Google Scholar
  9. Brandolini, A., & Vecchi, G. (2011). The well-being of Italians: A comparative historical approach. Economic History Working Papers N. 19, Rome: Bank of Italy. Google Scholar
  10. Broadberry, S., Giordano, C., & Zollino, F. (2011). A Sectoral Analysis of Italy’s Development, 1861–2011. Economic History Working Papers N. 20, Rome: Bank of Italy. Google Scholar
  11. Ciommi, M., Gigliarano, C., Chelli, F.M., & Gallegati, M. (2013). Behind, beside and beyond GDP: alternative to GDP and to macro-indicators. E-Frame EU-project. Deliverable 3.1. http://www.eframeproject.eu/fileadmin/Deliverables/Deliverable3.1.pdf
  12. Clark, A. (2016). SWB as a measure of individual well-being. In M. Adler & M. Fleurbaey (Eds.), Oxford handbook of well-being and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Clementi, F., Gallegati, M., & Gallegati, M. (2015). Growth and cycles of the Italian economy since 1861: The new evidence. Italian Economic Journal, 1(1), 25–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CNEL and ISTAT. (2013). BES 2013. Il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia. http://www.istat.it/it/files/2013/03/bes_2013.pdf
  15. CNEL and ISTAT. (2014). BES 2014. Il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia. http://www.istat.it/it/files/2014/06/Rapporto_Bes_2014.pdf
  16. Corbetta, P., & Piretti, M. S. (2009). Atlante storico-elettorale d’Italia: 18612008. Zanichelli.Google Scholar
  17. De Muro, P., Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2011). Composite Indices of development and poverty: An application to MDGs. Social Indicators Research, 104, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Di Nino, V., Eichengreen, B., & Sbracia, M. (2011). Real exchange rates, trade, and growth: Italy 1861–2011. Economic History Working Papers N. 10, Rome: Bank of Italy. Google Scholar
  19. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dreze, J., & Sen, A. K. (2002). India: Development and participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Durand, M. (2015). The OECD better life initiative: How’s life? and the measurement of well-being. Review of Income and Wealth, 61(1), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth, 89, 89–125.Google Scholar
  23. EUROSTAT. (2013). The EU in the world 2013. A statistical portrait. Luxembourg: Eurostat.Google Scholar
  24. Felice, E., & Vasta, M. (2015). Passive modernization? The new human development index and its components in Italy’s regions (1871–2007). European Review of Economic History, 19(1), 44–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fogel, R. W. (1994). Economic growth, population theory, and physiology: The bearing of long-term processes on the making of economic policy. The America Economic Review, 84(3), 369–395.Google Scholar
  26. Fogel, R.W., Engerman, S.L., & Trussell, J. (1982). Exploring the uses of data on height: The analysis of long-term trends in nutrition, labor welfare, and labor productivity. Social Science History, 401–421.Google Scholar
  27. Frey, B. S., Benz, M., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Introducing procedural utility: Not only what, but also how matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160, 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gomellini, M., & Pianta, M. (2007). Commercio con l'estero e tecnologia in Italia negli anni Cinquanta e Sessanta. In: C. Barbiellini., F. Amidei., R. Giannetti., M. Gomellini., S. Pastorelli., M. Pianta (Eds.), Innovazione tecnologica e sviluppo industriale nel secondo dopoguerra (pp. 359–594). Laterza, Roma-Bari.Google Scholar
  29. Hák, T., Janoušková, S., Abdallah, S., Seaford, C., & Mahony, S. (2012). Review report on beyond GDP indicators: Categorisation, intensions and impacts. BRAINPOOL deliverable 1.1, Final version, 18 October 2012. http://www.brainpoolproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/D1.1_BRAINPOoL_Review_report_Beyond-GDP_indicators.pdf
  30. Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (Eds.). (2015). World happiness report 2015. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
  31. INAIL. (1983). Centenario INAIL 1883–1983. Statistiche Storiche. Roma: INAIL.Google Scholar
  32. ISTAT. (2011). Italia in 150 anni. Sommario di statistiche storiche 1861–2011. Roma: Istat.Google Scholar
  33. ISTAT. (2014). Anni 1887–2011. La mortalità dei bambini ieri e offi in Italia, Focus statistiche, 15 gennaio 2014. http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/109861
  34. ISTAT HS—Italian historical statistical repository. http://timeseries.istat.it/
  35. ISTAT—I-Stat, data warehouse. http://dati.istat.it
  36. Knott, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1980). If dissemination is the solution, What is the problem? Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(4), 537–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Komlos, J. (1985). Stature and nutrition in the Habsburg monarchy: The standard of living and economic development in the eighteenth century. The American Historical Review, 1149–1161.Google Scholar
  38. Massoli, P., Mazziotta, M., Pareto, A., & Rinaldelli, C. (2014). Indici compositi per il BES. Giornate della Ricerca 10–11 Novembre 2014. Roma: Istat.Google Scholar
  39. Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2013). A non-compensatory composite index for measuring well-being over time. Cogito-Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 4, 93–104.Google Scholar
  40. Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2015). On a generalized non-compensatory composite index for measuring socio-economic phenomena. Social Indicators Research,. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0998-2.Google Scholar
  41. NEF. (2013). The happy planet index: 2012 report. A global index of suistanable well-being. http://www.happyplanetindex.org/assets/happy-planet-index-report.pdf. New Economic Foundation.
  42. OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD publishing.Google Scholar
  43. OECD. (2011). How’s life? 2011: Measuring well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. OECD. (2013). Guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Riccardini, F. (2014). Quali indicatori ci permetteranno di prevedere il mondo del 2050?. Napoli: Futuri, Italian Institute for the Future.Google Scholar
  46. Riccardini, F. (2015). Towards satellite accounts on education and human capital in OECD countries. In F. Maggino (Ed.), A new research agenda for improvements in Quality of Life (Vol. 57, pp. 205–230)., The series Social Indicators Research Series Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Self, A., Thomas, J., & Randall, C. (2012) Measuring national well-being: Life in the UK. Office for National Statistics. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171766_287415.pdf
  48. Steckel, R.H., & Floud, R. (1997). Health and welfare during industrialization. NBER Books.Google Scholar
  49. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.Google Scholar
  50. Tirelli, D. (2006). Pensato e Mangiato: il cibo nel vissuto e nell’immaginario degli Italiani. Agra Editore.Google Scholar
  51. Toniolo, G. (Ed.) (2013). L’Italia e l’economia mondiale. Dall’Unità a oggi. Marsilio, Venezia.Google Scholar
  52. van Zanden, J. L., Baten, J., Mira, d’ Ercole M., Rijpma, A., Smith, C., & Timmer, M. (2014). How was life?: Global well-being since 1820. Paris Cedex: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Vecchi, G. (2011). In ricchezza e in povertà. Il benessere degli Italiani dall’Unità a oggi. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  54. Veenhoven, R. (2014). World database of happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl. Assessed on 2016 May
  55. WHO—World Health Organization. (2013). World health statistics 2013. Geneva: WHO Press.Google Scholar
  56. Williamson, J. G. (1995). The evolution of global labor markets since 1830: Background evidence and hypotheses. Explorations in Economic History, 32(2), 141–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zeileis, A., Leisch, F., Hornik, K., & Kleiber, C. (2002). Strucchange: An R package for testing for structural change in linear regression models. Journal of Statistical Software, 7(2), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariateresa Ciommi
    • 1
  • Andrea Gentili
    • 1
    • 2
  • Barbara Ermini
    • 1
  • Chiara Gigliarano
    • 3
  • Francesco M. Chelli
    • 1
  • Mauro Gallegati
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics and Social SciencesUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsAlma Mater Studiorum - Università di BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversità degli Studi dell’InsubriaVareseItaly

Personalised recommendations