Tolerance Within Community: Does Social Capital Affect Tolerance?
- 369 Downloads
Tolerance is valuable in the development of any U.S. community. Individuals of varying religious beliefs, political leanings, and sexual orientations constitute communities. These differences can create unwanted divisions within the community if tolerance is not present. Examining through the framework of social capital theory, specifically civic engagement and social embeddedness, the present study seeks to understand what impacts an individual to be more tolerant of others. In the current study, tolerance is a broad measure that combines various types of individual characteristics into one dependent variable, including tolerance levels of different races, religious beliefs, and sexual orientations. Using independent measures of social capital in the form of civic engagement and social embeddedness, the study expects those individuals who have more instances of civic engagement and social embeddedness will be more tolerant of others compared to those with no or low levels of either civic engagement or social embeddedness.
KeywordsTolerance Community Social capital Civic engagement Social embeddedness
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
- Crowley, D. (2007). Summary of youth engagement strategy. Woburn, MA: Social Capital Inc.Google Scholar
- Diller, E. (2001). Citizens in service: The challenge of delivering civic engagement training to national service programs. Corporation for National Service. Retrieved July 14, 2014. https://nationalserviceresources.org/files/r2091-citizens-in-service.pdf.
- Hechter, M. (1988). Principles of group solidarity. Berkley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Henderson-King, D., & Kaleta, A. (2000). Learning about social diversity: The undergraduate experience and intergroup tolerance. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(2), 142–164.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2000). The three Cs of reducing prejudice and discrimination. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination: The Claremont symposium on applied social psychology (pp. 239–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, J. F. (1960). Letter and statements to the national conference of Christians and Jews conference, October 26, 1960. Retrieved December 15, 2014. http://www.jfklink.com/speeches/joint/app24_christiansandjews.html.
- Pearce, J. (1993). Volunteers: The organizational behavior of unpaid workers. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Putnam, R., & Campbell, D. (2006). Research | American grace. Retrieved August 14, 2013. http://www.thearda.com/Archive/Files/Descriptions/FTHMATT.asp.
- Rohe, W. (2004). Building social capital through community development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 158–164.Google Scholar
- Vogt, W. P. (1997). Tolerance & education: Learning to live with diversity and difference. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Whitley, B., & Kite, M. (2009). The psychology of prejudice and discrimination. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1998). The contribution of social resources to volunteering. Social Science Quarterly, 79(4), 799–814.Google Scholar