Social Indicators Research

, Volume 134, Issue 2, pp 403–419 | Cite as

Mapping Social Quality Clusters and Its Implications

  • Ka Lin
  • Hua Li


Comparative studies of social quality (SQ) are intricately entangled with social indicators for conducting the theoretical analysis of social reality. Thus, how to utilize and compare the data of social indicators constitutes a crucial issue for SQ comparisons. Since social quality studies possess a strong synthetic feature of analysis, the convenient method of indicator studies by listing score ranking by country seems insufficient to meet the research needs. This study will explore a new way of performing SQ comparisons through a measure of mapping that compiles a different SQ profile and elucidates its clustering effect. Through utilizing World Value Surveys, we present data on SQ-related issues from this database and analyze them through a new technical design. In this way, we identify three SQ clusters and providing some explanations about the rationale of this classification, through which the particular method of SQ analysis and their policy implications are demonstrated.


Social quality Social indicators Cluster Comparative studies Methodology 


  1. Abbott, P., & Wallace, C. (2012). Social quality: a way to measure the quality of society. Social Indicators Research, 108(1), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott, P., Wallace, C., & Sapsford, R. (2011). Surviving the transformation: Social quality in central Asia and the Caucuses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 199–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abbott, P., Wallace, C., Lin, K., & Haerpfer, C. (2015). The quality of society and life satisfaction in China. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0989-3.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, W., et al. (1997). Social quality: From issue to concept. In L. Maesen & A. Walker (Eds.), Wolfgang Beck. The social quality of Europe (pp. 263–297). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  5. Berman, Y., & Phillips, D. (2000). Indicators of social quality and social exclusion at national and community level. Social Indicators Research, 50(3), 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berman, Y., & Phillips, D. (2012). Social cohesion. In L. Maesen & A. Walker (Eds.), Social quality: from theory to indicators (pp. 149–172). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Bobkov, V., Olesya, V., & Ulvi, A. (2013). Risks of society stability and precarity of employment: A look at Russia. International Journal of Social Quality, 3(1), 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corbett, S. (2014). A critical qualitative study of the relationship between social empowerment and participatory democracy in the UK. International Journal of Social Quality, 4(1), 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ergin, I. (2015). Demographic and socioeconomic inequalities for self-rated health and happiness in elderly: The situation for Turkey regarding World Values Survey between 1990 and 2013. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 61(2), 224–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fairweather, A., Roncevic, B., Rydbjerg, M., Valentova, M., & Zajc, M. (2001). Reconceptualisation of social quality. European Journal of Social Quality, 3(1–2), 118–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gorden, D. (2012). Socio-Economic security. In L. Maesen & A. Walker (Eds.), Social quality: From theory to indicators (pp. 116–148). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Herrmann, P. (2012). Economic performance, social progress and social quality. International Journal of Social Quality, 2(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu, Z. (1995). Discussing about the calculation of the gravity point of a quadrangle. Bulletin des Sciences Mathematics, 5, 31–32 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  14. Kuriakose, N. & Robbins, M. (2015). Falsification in surveys: Detecting near duplicate observations. Arab Barometer Working Paper No. 2.Google Scholar
  15. Lin, K. (2014). Social quality and happiness—an analysis of the survey data from three Chinese cities. Applied Research in Quality of Life. doi: 10.1007/s11482-014-9352-0.Google Scholar
  16. Lin, K., & Herrmann, P. (Eds.). (2015). Social quality theory: A new perspective on social development. New York: Berghann Boooks.Google Scholar
  17. Maesen, L., & Walker, A. (2005). Indicators of social quality: Outcomes of the european scientific network. European Journal of Social Quality, 5(1/2), 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Phillips, D., & Berman, Y. (2001). Social quality and community citizenship. European Journal of Social Work, 4(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Phillips, D., & Berman, Y. (2003). Social quality and ethnos communities: Concepts and indicators. Community Development Journal, 38(4), 344–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. UNDP. (2014). Technical notesHuman Development Report 2013.
  21. Vinson, T., & Ericson, M. (2014). The social dimensions of happiness and life satisfaction of Australians: Evidence from the World Values Survey. International Journal of Social Welfare, 23, 240–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Walker, A. (1999). Social quality and the future of the European Union. European Journal of Social Quality, 1(1/2), 12–31.Google Scholar
  23. Walker, Alan. (2011). Social quality and welfare system sustainability. International Journal of Social Quality, 1(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Walker, A., & Wigfield, A. (2003). The social inclusion component of social quality (pp. 1–31). Amsterdam: EFSQ.Google Scholar
  25. Zeng, J. (2005). A character of gravity of quadrangle and its generalization. Bulletin des Sciences Mathematics, 44(3), 30–31 (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Public AdministrationZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Center of European StudiesZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  3. 3.International Association of Social QualityHagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations