Skip to main content

Quality of Work Life in Colombia: A Multidimensional Fuzzy Indicator

Abstract

Quality of work (QoW) encompasses multiple objective and subjective dimensions, which may include labor income, job stability, job satisfaction, and social security. This paper follows the method proposed by Gómez-Salcedo et al. (2013) that introduces a new way of measuring QoW, which consists of (1) the use of Sen’s functioning and capabilities approach and (2) a fuzzy sets method to define membership to the sets of good job quality. Using the Gran Encuesta Integrada de Hogares, we obtain results at the national level about age, gender, educational level, firm size, and industry sector. The results are consistent with previous literature. One topic that is highlighted from our results is the existence of a “Quality of Work Life Cycle”, with higher levels of the index up to age 30, that may have critical implications for the social security system; people with lower quality jobs may not be contributing to health and pension funds, leaving many people without access to a retirement fund and implying more demands on the subsidized system to cover health expenses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a review of how the QoW concept has been dealt with in the academic literature, see Martel and Dupuis (2006) and Dahl et al. (2009).

  2. 2.

    The self-employed will be any person resident in the country whose revenues come in at or above eighty percent (80 %) of the making and service delivery at their own risk, of economic activities identified according to Law 1607/2012 and Decree 3032/2013.

  3. 3.

    According to the National Administrative Department of Statistics-(DANE informal workers are persons who during the reference period were in one of the following situations: (1) Individual employees and workers who work in establishments, businesses or enterprises employing up to five persons in all its branches and agencies including the employer and/or members; (2) family workers not compensated in companies with five employees or less; (3) workers not compensated in companies or businesses from other households; (4) domestic workers in firms with five or fewer workers; (5) Laborers in companies of five employees or less; (6) self-employed persons working in establishments up to five people, excluding independent professionals; (7) employers in companies with five employees or less; (8) workers or government employees are excluded.

  4. 4.

    Political divisions of Colombia correspond to municipalities, departments and regions.

  5. 5.

    This group represents minors under the Colombian regulations.

References

  1. Agovino, M., & Parodi, G. (2014). Identifying the quality of work by fuzzy sets theory: A comparison between disable and non-disabled workers. Social Indicators Research, 119(3), 1627–1648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arango, L. E., & Hamann, F. (Eds.). (2012). El mercado de trabajo en Colombia: hechos, tendencias e instituciones. Bogotá: Banco de la República.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bérenger, V., & Verdier-Chouchane, A. (2007). Multidimensional measures of well-being: Standard of living and quality of life across countries. World Development, 35(7), 1259–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blank, R. M. (1990). Are part-time jobs bad jobs? In G. Burtless (Ed.), A future of lousy jobs? The changing structure of U.S wages (pp. 123–164). Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bustamante, C. D., & Arroyo, S. (2008). La raza como determinante del acceso a un empleo de calidad: un estudio para Cali. Revista Ensayos sobre Política Económica, 26(57), 130–175.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cheli, B., & Lemmi, A. (1995). A “totally” fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty. Economic Notes by Monte dei Paschi di Siena, 24(1), 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, A. E. (1996). Job satisfaction in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34(2), 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, A. E. (2005). Your money or your life: Changing job quality in OECD countries. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(3), 377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davoine, L. (2006). Are quantity and quality of Jobs correlated? Using, interpreting and discussing the Laeken indicators. In Document de travail (p. 59). París: Centre d'études de l'Emploi.

  10. Dahl, S., Nesheim, T., & Olsen, K. (2009). Quality of work–concept and measurement. Working Papers on the Reconciliation of Work and Welfare in Europe, REC-WP 05/2009.

  11. Desai, M., & Shah, A. (1988). An econometric approach to the measurement of poverty. Oxford Economic Papers, 40(3), 505–522.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dueñas, D., Iglesias, C., & Llorente, R. (2009). La Calidad del empleo en un contexto regional con especial referencia a la Comunidad de Madrid. Universidad de Alcalá. Serie Documentos de Trabajo, 05/2009, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dupuis, G., Taillefer, M.-C., Etienne, A.-M., Fontaine, O., Boivin, O. S., & Von Turk, A. (2000). Measurement of quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation. In J. Jobin, F. Maltais, & P. Leblanc (Eds.), Advances in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation (pp. 247–273). Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huneeus, F., Landerretche, O., & Puentes, E. (2012). Multidimensional measure of job quality persistence and heterogeneity in a developing country. Series Documentos de Trabajo, (357). Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Chile.

  15. Farné, S. (2003). Estudio sobre la calidad del empleo en Colombia. Resource document. OIT. http://white.oit.org.pe/osra/documentos/farne_dic9.pdf

  16. Farné, S., Vergara, C. A., & Baquero, N. (2011). La calidad del empleo en medio de la flexibilización laboral. Colombia 2002–2010. In Observatorio del mercado de trabajo y la seguridad social. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.

  17. Fernández, C. I., Heras, R. L., & Fernández, D. D. (2011). Calidad del empleo y satisfacción laboral en las regiones españolas.Un estudio con especial referencia a la Comunidad de Madrid. Investigaciones Regionales, 19, 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Freeman, R. B. (1978). Job satisfaction as an economic variable. The American Economic Review, 68(2), 135–141.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Galvis-Aponte, L. A. (2012). Informalidad laboral en las áreas urbanas de Colombia. Coyuntura Económica: Investigación Económica y Social, XLII(1), 15–51.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gittleman, M. B., & Howell, D. R. (1995). Changes in the structure and quality of jobs in the United States: Effects by race and gender, 1973–1990. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(3), 420–440.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gómez-Salcedo, M., Galvis-Aponte, L. A., & Aroca, P. (2013). Conmutación de larga distancia en Chile: el efecto de la calidad del empleo sobre la distancia y la probabilidad de conmutar [Mimeo]. Antofagasta: Universidad Católica del Norte.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gruenberg, B. (1980). The happy worker: An analysis of educational and occupational differences in determinants of jobs satisfaction. American Journal of Sociology, 86(2), 247–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jencks, C., Pearlman, L., & Rainwater, L. (1988). What is a good job? A new measure of labor market success. American Journal of Sociology, 93(6), 1322–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiménez, D. M., & Páez, J. N. (2014). Una metodología alternativa para medir la calidad del empleo en Colombia (2008–2012). Revista Sociedad y Economía, 27, 129–154.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kalleberg, A. L., & Marsden, P. V. (2012). Changing work values in the United States, 1973–2006. Social Science Research. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.012.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kohl, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1982). Job conditions and personality: A longitudinal assessment of reciprocal effects. American Journal of Sociology, 87(6), 1257–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lelli, S. (2001). Factor analysis vs. fuzzy sets theory: Assessing the influence of different techniques on Sen’s functioning approach. Discussions Paper Series (DPS), Department of Economics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.

  28. Lemmi, A., & Betti, G. (2006). Fuzzy set approach to multidimensional poverty measurement. New York: Springer. ISBN: 978-0387-34249-8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Martel, J., & Dupuis, G. (2006). Quality of work life: Theoretical and methodological problems, and presentation of a new model and measuring instrument. Social Indicators Research, 77(2), 333–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mora, J. J., & Ulloa, M. P. (2011). Calidad del Empleo en las principales ciudades Colombianas y endógeneidad de la educación. Revista de Economía Institucional, 13(25), 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Muñoz de Bustillo Llorente, R. M., & Fernández-Macías, E. F. (2005). Job satisfaction as an indicator of the quality of work. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(5), 656–673.

  32. Observatorio del Mercado Laboral de Cartagena y Bolívar. (2013). La calidad del empleo en la ciudad de Cartagena 2007–2011. Red de Observatorios Regionales del Mercado de Trabajo, RED ORMET. Bogotá, Colombia: PNUD. ISBN 978-958-8736-46-4.

  33. OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  34. OECD. (2013). Estudios económicos de la OCDE COLOMBIA Evaluación económica. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  35. OECD. (2014a). OECD employment outlook 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/emple_outlook-2014-en.

    Google Scholar 

  36. OECD. (2014b). Executive summary. OECD territorial reviews: Colombia 2014. Resource document. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264224551-3-en.

    Google Scholar 

  37. OECD. (2015). OECD employment outlook 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/emple_outlook-2015-en.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ortiz, C. H., & Uribe, J. I. (2006). Informalidad laboral en el área metropolitana de Cali 1992–1998. In J. I. Uribe (Ed.), Ensayos de economía aplicada al mercado laboral. Cali: Programa Editorial Universidad del Valle. ISBN: 9789584400185.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ortiz, C., Uribe, J., Posso, C. M., & García, G. A. (2007). Exclusión social en el mercado laboral del Valle del Cauca: desempleo y calidad del empleo 2001–2006. Informe final para el PNUD (Desarrollo Humano para el Valle del Cauca).

  40. Pineda, J., & Acosta, C. (2011). Calidad del trabajo: Aproximaciones teóricas y estimación de un índice compuesto. Revista Ensayos sobre Política Económica, 29(65), 60–105.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Posso, C. M. (2010). Calidad del empleo y segmentación laboral: un análisis para el mercado laboral Colombiano 2001–2006. Desarrollo y Sociedad, 65, 191–234.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Quiñones, M. (2011). El índice de calidad del empleo, una propuesta alternativa aplicada a Colombia. In Documento de trabajo (p. 136). Cali, Colombia: de la Universidad del Valle.

  43. Ritter, J. A. (2005). Patterns of job quality attributes in the European Union. Working Paper, 51. ILO.

  44. Rogerson, R. J. (1997). Quality of life in Britain. Glasgow: Quality of Life Research Group, Department of Geography, University of Strahclyde.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rosenthal, N. H. (1989). More than wages at issue in job quality debate. Monthly Labor Review, 112, 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Royuela, V., Lopez-Tamayo, J., & Suriñach, J. (2008). The Institutional vs. the academic definition of the quality of work life. What is the focus of the European commission? Social Indicators Research, 86(3), 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Royuela, V., Lopez-Tamayo, J., & Suriñach, J. (2009). Results of a quality of work life index in Spain. A comparison of survey results and aggregate social indicators. Social Indicators Research, 90(2), 225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Royuela, V., & Suriñach, J. (2012). Quality of work and aggregate productivity. Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 37–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sen, A. K. (1999). Desarrollo y Libertad. Barcelona: Editorial Planeta.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Turcotte, P. R. (1988). QVT: La Qualite de Vie au Travail: Une Voie vers l’Excellence. Montreal: Agence d’ARC.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zimmermann, H. J., & Zysno, P. (1983). Decisions and evaluations by hierarchical aggregation of information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 10(1), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was was made possible by a grant from Colombia’s national research council, COLCIENCIAS, which, during 2014, funded research exchange visits between the University of Barcelona and the Observatorio del Caribe Colombiano. Vicente Royuela was thereby able to visit the Observatorio in Cartagena de Indias and Mónica Gómez-Salcedo was able to visit the University of Barcelona. Any errors are responsibility of the authors alone. Vicente Royuela also acknowledges the support of ECO2013-41022-R.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicente Royuela.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 2.

Table 2 Unemployment Rate in OECD and South American Countries, 2005 and 2013

Appendix 2

See Table 3.

Table 3 Job Quality Index in Colombia: literature review

Appendix 3

See Table 4.

Table 4 Dimensions and variables to the quality of work index, descriptive statistics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gómez-Salcedo, M.S., Galvis-Aponte, L.A. & Royuela, V. Quality of Work Life in Colombia: A Multidimensional Fuzzy Indicator. Soc Indic Res 130, 911–936 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1226-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Quality of work
  • Fuzzy sets
  • Labor market
  • Colombia

JEL Classification

  • J81
  • J89
  • J46
  • C02