Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing Income-Related Health Inequality and Horizontal Inequity in China

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study aims to investigate both income-related health inequality and horizontal equity in urban and rural China. The 4th and 5th National Health Services Survey, and extended samples in Shaanxi Province surveyed in 2008 and 2013, were analysed. Health outcome was measured using the EQ-5D-3L utility, scored by the Chinese-specific tariff. The concentration index was calculated to measure the degree of income-related health inequality and was further decomposed to study the strength of different contributing factors to explain health inequality. The horizontal inequity was further measured based on the decomposition results. The final study sample consists of 15,505 respondents in 2008 and 48,808 respondents in 2013. Descriptive analysis shows that compared to 2008, respondents in both urban and rural China reported worse HRQoL in 2013. There was a pro-rich inequality of HRQoL in both urban and rural China. Controlling for demographic factors, the pro-rich inequity of HRQoL remains. Economic and educational statuses are found to be two key factors explaining the pro-rich inequity. The establishment of basic medical insurance has shown a mixed effect on reducing health inequality. Strategies to reduce the inequality of residents’ economic and educational status, through further implementing the poverty reduction policies, should be prioritised by the local government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anson, O., & Sun, S. (2004). Health inequalities in rural China: Evidence from HeBei Province. Health & Place, 10, 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brazier, J. E., Ratcliffe, J., Salomon, J., & Tsuchiya, A. (2007). Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazier, J. E., Yang, Y., Tsuchiya, A., & Rowen, D. L. (2010). A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. European Journal of Health Economics, 11, 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brixi, H., Mu, Y., Targa, B., & Hipgrave, D. (2013). Engaging sub-national governments in addressing health equities: Challenges and opportunities in China’s health system reform. Health Policy and Planning, 28, 809–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Inder, B., & Hollingsworth, B. (2014a). Health investment and economic output in regional China. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32, 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Liu, G. G., & Xu, F. (2014b). The impact of the Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance on health services utilisation in China. Pharmacoeconomics, 32, 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Wu, Y., & Coyte, P. (2014c). Income-related children’s health inequality and health achievement in China. International Journal for Equity in Health, 13, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., & Yan, X. (2012). Demand for voluntary basic medical insurance in urban China: Panel evidence from the Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance scheme. Health Policy and Planning, 27, 658–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, S., Begum, N., Harper, C., Whitty, J. A., & Scuffham, P. A. (2014). A comparison of EQ-5D-3L population norms in Queensland, Australia, estimated using utility value sets from Australia, the UK and USA. Quality of Life Research, 23, 2375–2381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, E., & Klein, R. (1980). Equity and the NHS: self-reported morbidity, access, and primary care. BMJ, 281, 1111–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Social Determinants of Health. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final report of the commission on social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coretti, S., Ruggeri, M., & McNamee, P. (2014). The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: A critical review. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 14, 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diderichsen, F. (2004). Resource allocation for health equity: Issues and methods. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, W., Lehrer, S., Rosenquist, N., & Audrain-McGovern, J. (2009). The impact of poor health on academic performance: New evidence using genetic markers. Journal of Health Economics, 28, 578–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol: A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16, 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, P., Dong, S., Xiao, J., Liu, C., Feng, X., & Wang, Y. (2010). Regional inequality in health and its determinants: Evidence from China. Health Policy, 94, 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, J. (2010). Poverty reduction in China and India: Policy implications of recent trends. DESA Working Paper No. 92. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York.

  • Gundgaard, J., & Lauridsen, J. (2006). A decomposition of income-related health inequality applied to EQ-5D. European Journal of Health Economics, 7, 231–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Y., Shibuya, K., Cheng, G., Rao, K., Lee, L., & Tang, S. (2010). Tracking China’s health reform. Lancet, 375, 1056–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinz, A., Klaiberg, A., Brahler, E., & Konig, H. H. (2006). The Quality of Life Questionnaire EQ-5D: modelling and norm values for the general population. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 56, 42–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, H., Wang, B., Gao, Q., Chao, J., Wang, S., Tian, L., & Liu, P. (2012). Comparison between EQ-5D and SF-6D utility in rural residents of Jiangsu Province, China. PLoS One, 7, e41550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N., Wagstaff, A., & Van Doorslaer, E. (1997). Socioeconomic inequalities in health: Measurement, computation, and statistical inference. Journal of Econometrics, 77, 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauridsen, J., Christiansen, T., Gundgaard, J., Hakkinen, U., & Sintonen, H. (2007). Decomposition of health inequality by determinants and dimensions. Health Economics, 16, 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Wei, X., Ma, A., & Chung, R. (2014). Inequalities in health status among rural residents: EQ-5D findings from household survey China. International Journal for Equity in Health, 13, 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G. G., Dow, W. H., Fu, A. Z., Akin, J., & Lance, P. (2008). Income productivity in China: On the role of health. Journal of Health Economics, 27, 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G. G., Wu, H., Li, M., Gao, C., & Luo, N. (2014). Chinese time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Value in Health, 17, 597–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, M. (2011). Poverty eradication in China: A new phase. United Nations. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/csocd/2011/Lu.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2015.

  • McGrail, K. M., van Doorslaer, E., Ross, N. A., & Sanmartin, C. (2009). Income-related health inequalities in Canada and the United States: A decomposition analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 1856–1863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D., & Sullivan, J. (2003). Measuring the well-being of the poor using income and consumption. Journal of Humam Resources, 38, S1180–S1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, O., van Doorslaer, E., Wagstaff, A., & Lindelow, M. (2008). Analyzing health equity using household survey data: A guide to techniques and their implementation. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perneger, T. V., Combescure, C., & Courvoisier, D. S. (2010). General population reference values for the French version of the EuroQol EQ-5D health utility instrument. Value in Health, 13, 631–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., McKie, J., & Bariola, E. (2014). Multi attribute utility instruments and their use. In A. J. Culyer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of health economics. San Diego: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzmann, L. (2009). Research and action: Toward good quality of life and equity in health. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 9, 143–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, S., Chen, J., Johannesson, M., Kind, P., Xu, L., Zhang, Y., & Burstrom, K. (2011). Population health status in China: EQ-5D results, by age, sex and socio-economic status, from the National Health Services Survey 2008. Quality of Life Research, 20, 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Z., Liang, Y., Liu, S., Cao, W., Tu, H., Guo, L., & Xu, Y. (2013). Health-related quality of life as measured with EQ-5D among populations with and without specific chronic conditions: A population-based survey in Shaanxi Province, China. PLoS One, 8, e65958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S., Meng, Q., Chen, L., Bekedam, H., Evans, T., & Whitehead, M. (2008). Tackling the challenges to health equity in China. Lancet, 372, 1493–1501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Doorslaer, E., Koolman, X., & Jones, A. (2004). Explaining income-related inequalities in doctor utilisation in Europe. Health Economics, 13, 629–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, A., van Doorslaer, E., & Watanabe, N. (2003). On decomposing the causes of health sector inequalities with an application to malnutrition inequalities in Vietnam. Journal of Econometrics, 112, 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Patrick, D., Edwards, T., Skalicky, A., Zeng, H., & Gu, W. (2012). Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China. Quality of Life Research, 21, 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, M. (1992). The concept and principles of equity in health. International Journal of Health Services, 22, 429–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W., & Kanavos, P. (2012). The less healthy urban population: Income-related health inequality in China. BMC Public Health, 12, 804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, W., Hsiao, W. C., Chen, W., Hu, S., Ma, J., & Maynard, A. (2012). Early appraisal of China’s huge and complex health-care reforms. Lancet, 379, 833–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Z., Han, B., Liao, X., Xiao, Y., & Hong, Y. (2010). Four-year follow-up surveying the influence of New Rural Cooperative Medical System on the equity of health output. Chinese Health Service Management, 27, 401–404. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Wang, J., Huang, F., Wu, S., Fang, Y., & Yan, X. (2014). Analysis on the relationship between the income level and the quality of life of rural residents in Shandong Province. Chinese Health Service Management, 1, 51–53. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z., Gao, J., Fox, A., Rao, K., Xu, K., Xu, L., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Measuring the equity of inpatient utilization in Chinese rural areas. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., Ru, X., & Hearst, N. (2014a). Individual and household-level predictors of health related quality of life among middle-aged people in rural mid-east China: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 14, 660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z., Zhu, L., Zhou, Z., Li, Z., Gao, J., & Chen, G. (2014b). The effects of China’s urban basic medical insurance schemes on the equity of health service utilisation: Evidence from Shaanxi province. International Journal for Equity in Health, 13, 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Health Department of Shaanxi Province for providing data for analysis. This study is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Serial number: 71203177) and Shaanxi Social Science Fund (Serial number: 12Q036) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gang Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Additional information

Zhongliang Zhou and Yu Fang are co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Z., Fang, Y., Zhou, Z. et al. Assessing Income-Related Health Inequality and Horizontal Inequity in China. Soc Indic Res 132, 241–256 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1221-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1221-1

Keywords

Navigation