The article presents the results of studies on soil shear strength at the interface of structures made of various materials. The authors propose procedures for performing direct shear tests at the soil-structure interface and determining the interface shear parameters according to cone penetration data. Recommendations for considering the type of construction material in soil-structure interaction calculations are provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
SP 24.13330.2011 Pile Foundations. Revised Edition of SNiP 2.02.03-85, Moscow (2011).
SP 25.13330.2012 Soil Bases and Foundations on Permafrost Soils. Revised Edition of SNiP 2.02.04-88, Moscow (2012).
GOST 12248-2010. Soils. Laboratory Methods for Determining the Strength and Strain Characteristics (amended), Standartinform, Moscow (2011).
A. B. Ainbinder and A. G. Kamershtein, Strength and Stability Calculations for the Main Pipelines [in Russian], Handbook, Nedra, Moscow (1982).
A. V. Sadovskii, G. I. Bondarenko, and S. M. Tikhomirov, “Upgraded shear apparatus for determining soil adfreeze strength and its application,” Trudy NIIOSP, No. 83, 37-43 (1985).
A. V. Sadovskii, “Determination of soil-concrete adfreeze strength using the direct shear test,” Trudy NIIOSP, No. 3, 70-79 (1967).
A. Z. Ter-Martirosyan, V. V. Sidorov, and A. S. Almakaeva, “Features and difficulties associated with determining strength at the interface between soil and structural materials,” Geotekhnika, 11, No. 4, 18-28.
Y. Tsubakihara and H. Kishida, “Friction behaviour between normally consolidated clay and steel by two direct shear type apparatuses,” Soils Found., 33, No. 2, 1-13 (1993).
Y. Tsubakihara, H. Kishida, and T. Nishiyama, “Friction between cohesive soils and steel,” Soils Found., 33, No. 2, 145-156 (1993).
M. Uesugi and H. Kishida, “Frictional resistance at yield between dry sand and mild steel,” Soils Found., 26, No. 4, 139-149 (1986).
J. J. B. Esterhuizen, G. M. Filz, and J. M. Duncan, “Constitutive behavior of geosynthetic interfaces,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 127, No. 10, 834-840 (2001).
F. Hammound and A. Boumekik, Asian J. Civ. Eng., 7, No. 1, 63-80 (2006).
H. T. Eid, R. S. Amarasinghe, K. H. Rabie, and D. Wijewickreme, Can. Geotech. J., 52, 198-210 (2015).
SP 22.13330.2011 Soil Bases of Buildings and Structures, Moscow (2011).
GOST 2789-73. Surface Roughness. Parameters and Characteristics, Standartinform, Moscow (2018).
P. B. Attewel, J. Yeates, and A. R. Selby, Soil Movements Inducted by Tunneling and their Effects on Pipelines and Structure, Glasgow and London, Published in the USA by Chapman and Hall, New York (1986).
Guidance on the Design of Buildings and Structures in the Undermined Territories. Part 3. Tower, Transport and Buried Structures, Pipelines [in Russian], Stroiizdat, Moscow (1986).
O. N. Isaev and R. F. Sharafutdinov, “Ultimate redundant strains of pressure pipe bases,” Osn. Fundam. Mech. Gruntov, No. 6, 14-19 (2016).
GOST 19912-2012. Soils. Field Test Methods: Cone Penetration Test and Dynamic Probing, Rosstandart, Moscow (2013).
I. B. Ryzhkov and O. N. Isaev, Cone Penetration Testing of Soils [in Russian], ASV, Moscow (2010).
O. N. Isaev, R. F. Sharafutdinov, and D. S. Zakatov, “Probes for cone penetration testing of soils with an additional lateral stress sensor,” Vestnik NITS Stroitelstvo, No. 4(23), 81-93 (2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Osnovaniya, Fundamenty i Mekhanika Gruntov, No. 2, pp. 23-30, March-April, 2020.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Isaev, O.N., Sharafutdinov, R.F. Soil Shear Strength at the Structure Interface. Soil Mech Found Eng 57, 139–146 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-020-09649-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-020-09649-0