Effects of Clay Minerals on Small-Strain Shear Modulus and Damping Ratio of Saturated Clay

This paper explored the impacts of montmorillonite and kaolinite (M-K) ratio as well as consolidation time on small-strain shear modulus and damping ratio of clay soils. A resonant column device was applied to the free vibration column tests. At small shear strain of 0.001%, the shear modulus and damping ratio increased by 57% and 105% respectively when the M-K ratio rose from 0.25 to 4. At higher M-K ratio, the maximum shear modulus grew at a larger rate with consolidation time and then became stable. In contrast, the damping ratio increased more slowly with shear strain at higher M-K ratio. Under a shear strain larger than 0.01%, a negative correlation of the damping ratio with the M-K ratio was found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    J. H. Atkinson and G. Sallfors, “Experimental determination of stress-strain-time characteristics in laboratory and in situ tests,” Proc. 10th Eur. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Eng., Florence, Italy, 3, 915-956 (1991).

  2. 2.

    K. Ishihara, Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxfordshire (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    L. R. Stavnitser and G. A. Nikitaeva, “Resonance method of determining the damping characteristics of soils,” Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 45(1), 9-12 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    T. Wichtmann and T. Triantafyllidis, “Influence of the grain-size distribution curve of quartz sand on the small strain shear modulus Gmax,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 135(10), 1404-1418 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    K. Senetakis, B. N. Madhusudhan and A. Anastasiadis, “Wave propagation attenuation and threshold strains of fully saturated soils with intraparticle voids,” J. Mater. Civil Eng., 28(2), 04015108 (2016).

  6. 6.

    M. Vucetic, G. Lanzo and M. Doroudian, “Damping at small strains in cyclic simple shear test,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 124(7), 585-594 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    A. F. Cabalar, “Applications of the triaxial, resonant column and oedometer tests to the study of micaceous sands,” Eng. Geol., 112, 21-28 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    C. S. El Mohtar, V. P. Drnevich, M. Santagata and A. Bobet, “Combined resonant column and cyclic triaxial tests for measuring undrained shear modulus reduction of sand with plastic fines,” Geotech. Test J., 36(4), 484-492 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    G. X. Chen, Z. L. Zhou, H. Pan, T. Sun and X. J. Li, “The influence of undrained cyclic loading patterns and consolidation states on the deformation features of saturated fine sand over a wide strain range,” Eng. Geol., 204, 77-93 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    J. F. Zhang, R. D. Andrus and C. H. Juang, “Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 131(4), 453-464 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    R. Conti and G. M. B. Viggiani, “Evaluation of soil dynamic properties in centrifuge tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 138(7), 850-859 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Y. G. Zhou, Z. B. Sun and Y. M. Chen, “Curved ray paths of shear waves and measurement accuracy of bender elements in centrifuge model tests,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 142(6), 04016008 (2016).

  13. 13.

    C. Santamarina, K. Klein and M. Fam, Soils and Waves, John Wiley and Sons, New York (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    G. C. Cho, J. Dodds and C. Santamarina, “Particle shape on packing density stiffness and strength,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 132(5), 591-602 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    T. Wichtmann, M. N. Hernandez, R. Martinez, F. D. Graeff, E. Giolo and T. Triantafyllidis, “Estimation of the small-strain stiffness of granular soils taking into account the grain size distribution curve,” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotech. Eng., Santiago, Chile (2011).

  16. 16.

    C. R. I. Clayton, “Stiffness at small strain: research and practice,” Geotechnique, 61(1), 5-37 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    B. M. Darendeli, “Development of a new family of normalize modulus reduction and material damping curves,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas (2001).

  18. 18.

    K. H. II. Stokoe, M. B. Darendeli, R. B. Gilbert, F. Y. Menq and W. K. Choi, “Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves,” Proc. NSF/PEER Int. Workshop on Uncertainties in Nonlinear Soil Properties and their Impact on Modeling Dynamic Soil Response, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California (2004).

  19. 19.

    M. Gareche, A. Allal, N. Zeraibi, F. Roby, N. Azril and L. Saoudi, “Relationship between the fractal structure with the shear complex modulus of montmorillonite suspensions,” Appl. Clay Sci., 123, 11-17 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    M. A. A. Beroya, A. Aydin and R. Katzenbach, “Insight into the effects of clay mineralogy on the cyclic behavior of silt-clay mixtures,” Eng. Geol., 106(3), 154-162 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    I. B. Gratchev, K. Sassa, V. I. Osipov, H. Fukuoka and G. Wang, “Undrained cyclic behavior of bentonitesand mixtures and factors affecting it,” Geotech. Geol. Eng., 25(3), 349-367 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    B. Tiwari and B. Ajmera, “A new correlation relating the shear strength of reconstituted soil to the proportions of clay minerals and plasticity characteristics,” Appl. Clay Sci., 53(1), 48-57 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    W. F. Marcuson and H. E. Wahls, “Time effects on dynamic shear modulus of clays,” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 98(12),1359-1373 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    ASTM, STP 1213, Dynamic geotechnical testing II. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (1994).

  25. 25.

    R. S. Ladd, “Preparing test specimens using under-compaction,” Geotech. Test J., 1(1), 16-23 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    R. S. Ladd, “Specimen preparation and liquefaction of sands,” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 100(10), 1180-1184 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    B. Ajmera and B. Tiwari, “Damping and shear moduli of laboratory-prepared mineral mixtures,” Geotech. Frontier, 10-18 (2017).

  28. 28.

    K. Fahoum, M. S. Aggour and F. Amini, “Dynamic properties of cohesive soils treated with lime,” J. Geotech. Eng., 122(5), 382-389 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun-Jun Ni.

Additional information

Translated from Osnovaniya, Fundamenty i Mekhanika Gruntov, No. 2, p. 9, March-April, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, P., Ni, J., Garg, A. et al. Effects of Clay Minerals on Small-Strain Shear Modulus and Damping Ratio of Saturated Clay. Soil Mech Found Eng 57, 105–109 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-020-09644-5

Download citation