Geometrically Nonlinear Buckling Stability Analysis of Axially Loaded Underground Pipelines

  • T. R. Rashidov
  • E. V. An
SOIL MECHANICS
  • 32 Downloads

The paper presents an analysis of buckling stability of underground engineering life-support systems, located in water-saturated soils. Analytical and numerical(FEM) solutions are presented and shown to agree well. The influence of soil rheological properties, as well as pipeline geometrical and mechanical parameters on the system dynamic stability, was numerically simulated.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. R. Rashidov, Dynamic Theory of Seismic Stability of Complex Underground Installation Systems [in Russian], FAN, Tashkent (1973).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Yasuda, S. Mayuzumi, and H. Onose, "Appropriate countermeasures against liquefaction induced uplift of existing manholes and pipes," Performance-Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 1127-1132 (2009).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Lanzano, F. Santucci de Magistris, G. Fabbrocino, and E. Salzano, "Multidisciplinary approach for the seismic vulnerability evaluation of lifelines and structural components of industrial plants," 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering in Lisbon (2012).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. Friedmann and B. Debouvry, "Analytical design method helps prevent buried pipe upheaval," Pipe Line Ind., 76, No. 11, 63-69 (1992).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. S. Volmir, Stability of Elastic Systems [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1967).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Kauderer, Nonlinear Mechanics [in Russian], IL, Moscow (1961).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. S. Volmir et al, Problems in Strength of Materials [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1984).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1988).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. V. An and T.R. Rashidov, "Seismodynamics of underground pipelines interacting with water-saturated fine-grained soil," Mekh. Tverd. Tela, No. 3, 89-104 (2015).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Uno, F. Oka, S. Tanizaki, and A. Tateishi, "Centrifuge model tests on the uplift behavior of an underground structure during liquefaction and its numerical modeling," Performance-Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 1127-1132 (2009).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. I. Malyi, "Qualitative analysis of the process of buckling of a rod with a longitudinal impact," Proc. of International Symposium on Mechanics of Deformable Solids in Honor of A.A. Ilyushin's 95th Birthday Anniversary, 351-358 (2006).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. V. Kapitanov, V.F. Ovchinnikov, and L.V. Smirnov, "The dynamics of an axially loaded elastic bar after loss of stability," Probl. Prochn. Plastichn., No. 76(3), 205-216 (2014).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    The Tashkent Earthquake of 26 April 1966 [in Russian], Akad. Nauk Uzbek. SSR, FAN, Tashkent (1971).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Yasuko and I. Daisuke, "Liquefaction hotspot based on pipeline damage and topographical history in the Kashima region during the 2011 off the pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake," 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering in Lisbon (2012).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. R. Rashidov
    • 1
  • E. V. An
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Mechanics and Seismic Stability of Buildings, UASTashkentUzbekistan

Personalised recommendations