The Academic Conference as a Chilly Climate for Women: Effects of Gender Representation on Experiences of Sexism, Coping Responses, and Career Intentions
Across many disciplines, women are underrepresented in faculty positions relative to men. The present research focuses on the academic conference as a setting because it is a gateway to an academic career and a context in which women might experience sexism. We surveyed 329 presenters (63% women) from three U.S. national academic conferences, which differed in women-to-men ratios, about their perceptions of the conference climate, their coping tactics (e.g., gender performance, silence, or voice), and their intentions to exit the conference or academia. The greater the representation of women at the conference relative to men, the less likely were women to perceive sexism and to feel they had to behave in a masculine manner in that setting. In contrast, women who perceived the conference as sexist and felt silenced also expressed increased intentions to exit from academic careers. Men’s perceptions of sexism predicted increased intentions to exit from that particular conference, but not from academia. Because conferences signal the norms of a discipline, it is important to explore their climates as they relate to gender. Perhaps especially for new and aspiring female academics, they may signal devalued status and lack of fit and as such play an inadvertent role in the “leaky pipeline.” We discuss strategies that conference organizers could implement to mitigate sexist climates, including broader inclusion of women in speaking and leadership roles and explicit attention to cues that women belong.
KeywordsSexism Academic settings Gender equality Organizational climate Career commitment
The present manuscript is based on data from the first author’s doctoral dissertation.
- Benokraitis, N. V. (1997). Sex discrimination in the 21st century. In N. V. Benokraitis (Ed.), Subtle sexism: Current practice and prospects for change (pp. 5–33). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Biernat, M., & Hawley, P. (2017). Sexualized images in professional contexts: Effects on anticipated experiences and perceived climate for women and men. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
- Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Garcia, D. M., Reser, A. H., Amo, R. B., Redersdorff, S., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Perceivers’ responses to in-group and out-group members who blame a negative outcome on discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 769–780. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271584.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Janz, T. A., & Pyke, S. W. (2000). A scale to assess student perceptions of academic climates. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 30, 89–122.Google Scholar
- Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2002). Group reactions to loyalty and disloyalty. In S. Thye & E. Lawler (Eds.), Group cohesion, trust, and solidarity (pp. 203–228). New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2010). Survey of doctorate recipients. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics.
- Riley, S., Frith, H., Archer, L., & Veseley, L. (2006). Institutional sexism in academia. The Psychologist, 19, 94–100.Google Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Autonomy is no illusion: Self-determination theory and the empirical study of authenticity, awareness, and will. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 449–479). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Schmitt, M. T., Ellemers, N., & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Perceiving and responding to gender discrimination in organizations. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 277–292). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 255–270. doi: 10.1037/a0021385.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (2009). Sexism. In T. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 407–430). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
- Toren, N. (1990). Would more women make a difference? In S. Stiver Lie & V. E. O'Leary (Eds.), Storming the tower: Women in the academic world (pp. 74–85). London: Kogan.Google Scholar
- Tsui, A. S., & Gutek, B. A. (1999). Demographic differences in organizations: Current research and future directions. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Yoder, J. D. (1994). Looking beyond numbers: The effects of gender status, job prestige, and occupational gender-typing on tokenism processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 150–159. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2786708.