Sex Roles

, Volume 67, Issue 11–12, pp 646–658

Young Adults’ Perceptions of Non-Forcible Sexual Activity: The Effects of Participant Gender, Respondent Gender, and Sexual Act

Original Article

Abstract

There is a gendered double standard for both sexual activity and criminal victimization, in that female sexual actors and victims are generally viewed more negatively than their male counterparts. In this study, 485 U.S. undergraduates at a large Northeastern university completed a questionnaire in which the gender of the victim and the nature of the non-forcible sexual act (sexual intercourse or oral sex) were experimentally manipulated. The provided scenarios depicted statutory rape situations, characterized by age discrepancies between the two parties. Respondents were asked to rate each of the parties on a series of questions to determine their level of condemnation for each of the parties involved. We hypothesized the existence of a sexual double standard, such that female actors would be more condemned than males. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated that respondents were more condemning of female than male victims, regardless of which act was depicted. Furthermore, male respondents were more condemning of a female perpetrator of statutory rape than of her male victim, and also more condemning of a female victim than of her male perpetrator, whereas female respondents did not differentiate between the victim and perpetrator, regardless of the depicted victim gender or sexual act. That is, whether she was depicted as the victim or perpetrator of the act, the female was more condemned than her male counterpart. Overall, female respondents were more condemning than male respondents, regardless of which act was depicted. These findings suggest the presence of a sexual double standard in perceptions of statutory rape.

Keywords

Gender Sexual double standard Statutory rape 

References

  1. Acock, A. C., & Ireland, N. K. (1983). Attribution of blame in rape cases: The impact of norm violation, gender, and sex-role attitude. Sex Roles, 9, 179–193. doi:10.1007/BF00289622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (1997). Statistical methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Aubrey, J. S. (2004). Sex and punishment: An examination of sexual consequences and the sexual double standard in teen programming. Sex Roles, 50, 505–514. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000023070.87195.07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benedict, H. (1992). Virgin or vamp: How the press covers sex crimes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Broussard, S., Wagner, W. G., & Kazelskis, R. (1991). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of child sexual abuse: The impact of victim sex, perpetrator sex, respondent sex and victim response. Journal of Family Violence, 6, 267–278. doi:10.1007/BF00980533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bullough, V. L. (2004). Age of consent: A historical overview. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 16(2/3), 25–39. doi:10.1300/J056v16n02_03.Google Scholar
  7. Chambers, W. C. (2007). Oral sex: Varied behaviors and perceptions in a college population. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 28–42. doi:10.1080/00224490709336790.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandra, A., Mosher, W. D., Copen, C., & Sionean, C. (2011). Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual identity in the united states: Data from the 2006–2008 national survey of family growth. Centers for disease control national health statistics reports, 36. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  9. Cocca, C. E. (2004). Jailbait: The politics of statutory rape laws in the United States. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  10. Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26. doi:10.1080/00224490309552163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies, M. (2002). Male sexual assault victims: A selective review of the literature and implications for support services. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 203–214. doi:10.1016/51359-1789(00)00043-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies, M., & Rogers, P. (2006). Perceptions of male victims in depicted sexual assaults: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 367–377. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, J. A., Smith, T. W., & Marsden, P. V. (2010). General social surveys, 1972–2008. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut; Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. doi:10.3886/ICPSR25962.v2.
  14. Dollar, K. M., Perry, A. R., Fromuth, M. E., & Holt, A. R. (2004). Influence of gender roles on perceptions of teacher/adolescent student sexual relations. Sex Roles, 50, 91–101. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000011075.91908.98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frese, B., Moya, M., & Megias, J. L. (2004). Social perception of rape: how rape myth acceptance modulates the influence of situational factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 143–161. doi:10.1177/0886260503260245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halpern-Felsher, B., Cornell, J., Kropp, R. Y., & Tschann, J. M. (2005). Oral versus vaginal sex among adolescents: Perceptions, attitudes, and behavior. Pediatrics, 115, 845–851. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koon-Magnin, S., Kreager, D. A., & Ruback, R. B. (2010). Partner age differences, educational contexts and adolescent female sexual activity. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 42, 206–213. doi:10.1363/4220610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koon-Magnin, S. & Ruback, R.B. (in press). The perceived legitimacy of statutory rape laws: The effects of victim age, perpetrator age, and age-span. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  19. Kopper, B. A. (1996). Gender, gender identity, rape myth acceptance and time of initial resistance on the perception of acquaintance rape blame and avoidability. Sex Roles, 34, 81–93. doi:10.1007/BF01544797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kreager, D. A., & Staff, J. (2009). The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 143–164. doi:10.1177/019027250907200205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52, 175–186. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCauley, M. R., & Parker, J. F. (2001). When will a child be believed? The impact of the victim’s age and juror’s gender on children’s credibility and verdict in a sexual-abuse case. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 523–539. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00224-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Michael M. v. (1981). Superior Court of Sonoma County, 450 US 464.Google Scholar
  24. Oberman, M. (2004). Turning girls into women: Re-evaluating modern statutory rape law. DePaul Journal of Health Care Law, 8, 4–19. doi:0091-4169/94/8501-0015.Google Scholar
  25. Phipps, C. A. (2003). Misdirected reform: On regulating consensual sexual activity between teenagers. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 12, 373–440.Google Scholar
  26. Posner, R. A., & Silbaugh, K. B. (1996). A guide to America’s sex laws. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Quas, J. A., Bottoms, B. L., Haegerich, T. M., & Nysse-Carris, K. L. (2002). Effects of victim, defendant, and juror gender on decisions in child sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1993–2021. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02061.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reiss, I. L. (1967). The social context of premarital sexual permissiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  29. Ruback, R. B., Ménard, K., Outlaw, M. C., & Shafer, J. N. (1999). Normative advice to campus crime victims: Effects of gender, age, and alcohol. Violence and Victims, 14, 381–396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schneider, L. J., Ee, J. S., & Aronson, H. (1994). Effects of victim gender and physical vs. Psychological trauma/injury on observers’ perceptions of sexual assault and its aftereffects. Sex Roles, 30, 793–808. doi:10.1007/BF01544232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, G., Mysak, K., & Michael, S. (2008). Sexual double standards and sexually transmitted illnesses: Social rejection and stigmatization of women. Sex Roles, 58, 391–401. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9339-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Struckman-Johnson, D., & Struckman-Johnson, C. (1996). College men’s reactions to hypothetical forceful sexual advances from women. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 8(1/2), 93–105. doi:10.1007/BF00289430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Troup-Leasure, K. H. & Snyder, N. (2005, August). Statutory rape known to law enforcement. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/208803.pdf.
  34. White, B. H., & Kurpius, S. E. R. (2002). Effects of victim sex and sexual orientation on perceptions of rape. Sex Roles, 46, 191–200. doi:10.1023/A:1019617920155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal Justice and Political ScienceUniversity of South AlabamaMobileUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations