Young Adults’ Perceptions of Non-Forcible Sexual Activity: The Effects of Participant Gender, Respondent Gender, and Sexual Act
- 904 Downloads
There is a gendered double standard for both sexual activity and criminal victimization, in that female sexual actors and victims are generally viewed more negatively than their male counterparts. In this study, 485 U.S. undergraduates at a large Northeastern university completed a questionnaire in which the gender of the victim and the nature of the non-forcible sexual act (sexual intercourse or oral sex) were experimentally manipulated. The provided scenarios depicted statutory rape situations, characterized by age discrepancies between the two parties. Respondents were asked to rate each of the parties on a series of questions to determine their level of condemnation for each of the parties involved. We hypothesized the existence of a sexual double standard, such that female actors would be more condemned than males. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated that respondents were more condemning of female than male victims, regardless of which act was depicted. Furthermore, male respondents were more condemning of a female perpetrator of statutory rape than of her male victim, and also more condemning of a female victim than of her male perpetrator, whereas female respondents did not differentiate between the victim and perpetrator, regardless of the depicted victim gender or sexual act. That is, whether she was depicted as the victim or perpetrator of the act, the female was more condemned than her male counterpart. Overall, female respondents were more condemning than male respondents, regardless of which act was depicted. These findings suggest the presence of a sexual double standard in perceptions of statutory rape.
KeywordsGender Sexual double standard Statutory rape
We would like to thank Professor Irene Frieze for her comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Those comments have helped to shape this manuscript.
- Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (1997). Statistical methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Benedict, H. (1992). Virgin or vamp: How the press covers sex crimes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Chandra, A., Mosher, W. D., Copen, C., & Sionean, C. (2011). Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual identity in the united states: Data from the 2006–2008 national survey of family growth. Centers for disease control national health statistics reports, 36. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
- Cocca, C. E. (2004). Jailbait: The politics of statutory rape laws in the United States. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Davis, J. A., Smith, T. W., & Marsden, P. V. (2010). General social surveys, 1972–2008. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut; Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. doi: 10.3886/ICPSR25962.v2.
- Koon-Magnin, S. & Ruback, R.B. (in press). The perceived legitimacy of statutory rape laws: The effects of victim age, perpetrator age, and age-span. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.Google Scholar
- Michael M. v. (1981). Superior Court of Sonoma County, 450 US 464.Google Scholar
- Phipps, C. A. (2003). Misdirected reform: On regulating consensual sexual activity between teenagers. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 12, 373–440.Google Scholar
- Posner, R. A., & Silbaugh, K. B. (1996). A guide to America’s sex laws. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Reiss, I. L. (1967). The social context of premarital sexual permissiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Troup-Leasure, K. H. & Snyder, N. (2005, August). Statutory rape known to law enforcement. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/208803.pdf.