Abstract
This study extends the literature on attitudes toward gender roles by exploring whether the nature of sexism (i.e., benevolence and hostility directed at men) differs among university students from two under-researched countries, Poland (n = 190) and South Africa (n = 188), in a comparison with students in the United Kingdom (n = 166). Based on empirical literature applying Ambivalent Sexism Theory, and in the light of the socio-political context, it was hypothesized that: (1) both hostile and benevolent attitudes toward men in Poland would be more liberal than in South Africa and more conservative than in the United Kingdom, and (2), women would exhibit more hostile but less benevolent attitudes than men in relatively more conservative South Africa. The Ambivalence to Men Inventory was used to measure the two types of sexist attitudes about men. Findings supported the first hypothesis for hostile attitudes and partially for benevolent attitudes. South African and Polish students were more benevolent and hostile to men than British students, and students from South Africa were more hostile than those from Poland. Moreover, as predicted, a significant country-by-gender interaction revealed that South African women had more hostile and less benevolent attitudes to men than South African men. No such gender gap was present in the case of hostile attitudes in Poland and benevolent attitudes in the United Kingdom. Findings are discussed in terms of Ambivalent Sexism Theory and the countries’ socio-cultural context.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, J. C. (2010). Why do women endorse hostile and benevolent sexism? The role of salient female subtypes and internalization of sexist contents. Sex Roles, 62, 453–467. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9707-4.
Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1990). Cross-cultural assessment of personality: The case for replicatory factor analysis. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 8, pp. 27–48). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bhana, A., Zimmerman, R., & Cupp, P. (2008). Gender role attitudes and sexual risk among adolescents in South Africa. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 3, 112–119. doi:10.1080/17450120701867546.
Blau, F. D., Brinton, M. C., & Grusky, D. B. (2006). The declining significance of gender? New York: Russell Sage.
Boski, P., Chojnowska, M., & Koziej, J. (2007). Kultura i tożsamość rodzaju: porównania polsko-włoskie i polsko-niemieckie [Culture and gender identity: Polish-Italian and Polish-German comparison]. Psychological Studies, 45(2), 5–20.
Braun, M., & Scott, J. (2009). Gender-role egalitarianism—is the trend reversal real? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21, 362–367. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edp032.
Crompton, R., Brockmann, M., & Lyonette, C. (2005). Attitudes, women’s employment and the domestic division of labour: A cross-national analysis of two waves. Work, Employment & Society, 19, 213–233. doi:10.1177/0950017005053168.
Dodoo, F. N., & Frost, A. E. (2008). Gender in African population research: The fertility/reproductive health example. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 431–451. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134552.
Dorius, S. F., & Alwin, D. F. (2010). The global development of egalitarian beliefs—a decomposition of trends in the nature and structure of gender ideology. Ann Arbor: Population Studies Centre Research Report, University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
England, P. (2006). Toward gender equality: Progress and bottlenecks. In F. D. Blau, M. C. Brinton, & D. B. Grusky (Eds.), The declining significance of gender? (pp. 245–264). New York: Russell Sage.
Forbes, G. B., Doroszewicz, K., Card, K., & Adams-Curtis, L. (2004). Association of the thin body ideal, ambivalent sexism, and self-esteem with body acceptance and the preferred body size of college women in Poland and the United States. Sex Roles, 50, 331–345. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000018889.14714.20.
Frieze, I. H., Ferligoj, A., Kogovsek, T., Rener, T., Horvat, J., & Sarlija, N. (2003). Gender-role attitudes in university students in the United States, Slovenia, and Croatia. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 256–261. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00105.
Gibbons, L. J., Stiles, D. A., & Shokodriani, G. M. (1991). Adolescents” attitudes toward family and gender roles: An international comparison. Sex Roles, 25, 625–643. doi:10.1007/BF00289568.
Glick, P. (2004). The other side of the coin: Ambivalence toward men and gender inequality. A comment on Viki (2004). Social Psychological Review, 6(2), 89–92.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The ambivalence toward men inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519–536. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001a). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001b). Ambivalent sexism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol.33 (pp. 115–188). San Diego: Academic.
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., & Masser, B. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 765–775. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763.
Glick, P., Lameiras, M., & Castro, Y. R. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47, 433–441. doi:10.1023/A:1021696209949.
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Masser, B., Manganelli, A. M., Huang, L., Castro, Y. R., et al. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.713.
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4.
Hassim, S. (2002). “A conspiracy of women”: The women’s movement in South Africa’s transition to democracy. Social Research, 69, 693–732.
Hassim, S. (2005). Nationalism displaced: Citizenship discourses in transition. In A. Gouws (Ed.), (Un)thinking citizenship: Feminist debates in contemporary South Africa (pp. 55–69). Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Introduction: Explaining the rising tide of gender equality. In R. Inglehart & P. Norris (Eds.), Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world (pp. 1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ksiniewicz, M. (2004). Specyfika polskiego feminizmu. [Specificity of Polish feminism]. Kultura i Historia, 6, 90–100.
LaFont, S. (2001). One step forward, two steps back: Women in the post-communist states. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 34, 203–220. doi:10.1016/S0967-067X(01)00006-X.
Lane, K. A., Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A., & Gereenwald, A. G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV. In B. Wittenbrink & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 59–102). London: The Guilford Press.
Levant, R. F., Richmond, K., Sellers, A., Mitina, O., Cuthbert, A., Mateveev, A., et al. (2003). Masculinity ideology among Russian and U.S. young men and women and its relationship to unhealthy lifestyle habits among young Russian men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4, 26–36. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.26.
Lewicka, M. (2005). Polacy są wielkim i dumnym narodem, czyli nasz portret (wielce) zróżnicowany. [Poles are a great and proud nation, i.e., a (very) diverse portrayal of ours]. In M. Drogosz (Ed.), Jak Polacy Przegrywają Jak Polacy Wygrywają? (pp. 5–35). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Luyt, R. (2005). The Male Attitude Norms Inventory-II: A measure of masculinity ideology in South Africa. Men & Masculinities, 8, 208–229. doi:10.1177/1097184X04264631.
Luyt, R. (2011). Representation of gender in South African Television Advertising: A content analysis. Sex Roles, 65, 356–370. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0027-0.
Mantell, J. E., Needham, S. L., Smit, J. A., Hoffman, S., Cebekhulu, Q., Adams-Skinner, J., et al. (2009). Gender norms in South Africa: Implications for HIV and pregnancy prevention among African and Indian women students at a South African tertiary institution. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11, 139–157. doi:10.1080/13691050802521155.
McDaniel, A. E. (2008). Measuring gender egalitarianism: The attitudinal differences between men and women. International Journal of Sociology, 38(1), 58–80. doi:10.2753/IJS0020-7659380103.
Nelson, T. D. (2002). The psychology of prejudice. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Office for National Statistics. (2011). Patterns of pay: Results of the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 1997 to 2010. Retrieved from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/index.html.
Olson, J., Frieze, I., Wall, S., Zdaniuk, B., Ferligoj, A., Kogovšek, T., et al. (2007). Beliefs in equality for women and men as related to economic factors in Central and Eastern Europe and the United States. Sex Roles, 56, 297–308. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9171-3.
Pollert, A. (2003). Women, work and equal opportunities in post-communist transition. Work, Employment & Society, 17, 331–357. doi:10.1177/0950017003017002006.
Robila, M., & Krishnakumar, A. (2004). The role of children in Eastern European families. Children & Society Volume, 18, 30–41. doi:10.1002/chi.773.
Rosner, K. (1997). Czy istnieje w Polsce ruch feministyczny? [Does the feminist movement exist in Poland?]. Pelnym Glosem, 5, 13–27.
Rudman, L. A., & Kilianski, S. E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes towards female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1315–1328. doi:10.1177/0146167200263001.
Scott, J. (2006, September). Family and gender roles: How attitudes are changing (GeNet Working Paper No. 21). Cambridge, UK.
Seguino, S. (2007). PlusÇa change? Evidence on global trends in gender norms and stereotypes. Feminist Economics, 13(2), 1–28. doi:10.1080/13545700601184880.
Shafiro, M. V., Himelein, M. J., & Best, D. L. (2003). Ukrainian and U.S. American females: Differences in individualism/collectivism and gender attitudes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 297–303.
Shefer, T., Crawford, M., Strebel, A., Simbayi, L. C., Dwadwa-Henda, N., Cloete, A., et al. (2008). Gender, power and resistance to change among two communities in the Western Cape, South Africa. Feminism & Psychology, 18, 157–182. doi:10.1177/0959353507088265.
Sibley, C. G., & Wilson, M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51, 687–696. doi:10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x.
Sibley, C. G., Overall, N. C., & Duckitt, J. (2007). When women become more hostilely sexist toward their gender: The system-justifying effect of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 57, 743–754. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9306-1.
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199.
Swim, J. K., Mallet, R., Russo-Devosa, Y., & Stangor, C. (2005). Judgments of sexism: A comparison of the subtlety of sexism measures and sources of variability in judgments of sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 406–411. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00240.x.
Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus ça change, plus c’est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842–849. doi:10.1177/0146167295218007.
Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies. Washington: Department of the Army.
Twenge, J. M. (2001). Changes in women’s assertiveness in response to status and roles: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1931-1933. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 133–145. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.133.
United Nations Development Programme (2009) HDR 2009. Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1994). Methodological issues in cross-cultural studies on parental rearing behavior and psychopathology. In C. Perris, W. A. Arrindell, & M. Eisemann (Eds.), Parenting and psychopathology (pp. 173–197). Chichester: Wiley.
Viki, G., & Abrams, D. (2004). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Complementary system justifying ideologies. Social Psychological Review, 6(2), 76–88.
Walter, N. (2010). Living dolls, the return of sexism. London: Virago Press.
Waylen, G. (2004). What can the South African transition tell us about gender and democratization? Unpublished manuscript, Queens University Belfast.
Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty-nation study. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Williams, J. E., Satterwhite, R. C., & Best, D. L. (1999). Pancultural gender stereotypes revisited: The Five Factor Model. Sex Roles, 40, 513–525. doi:10.1023/A:1018831928829.
Yakushko, O. (2005). Ambivalent sexism and relationship patterns among women and men in Ukraine. Sex Roles, 52, 586–596. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3727-5.
Zahidi, S., & Ibarra, H. (2010). The corporate gender gap report 2010. Paper presented at the World Economic Forum, Genf.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Prof. Irene Frieze, four anonymous reviewers, and Dr David Giles for their insightful and useful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. We would also like to thank the University of Winchester for sponsoring this research through a Research and Knowledge Transfer Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zawisza, M., Luyt, R. & Zawadzka, A.M. Ambivalence Toward Men: Comparing Sexism Among Polish, South African and British University Students. Sex Roles 66, 453–467 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0112-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0112-4