Internet Neutrality: A Battle Between Law and Ethics
- 643 Downloads
In 2016, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India issued the Prohibition of Discriminatory Tariffs for Data Services Regulations. It favours the principle of internet neutrality. This principle suggests that all data on the internet should be treated equally without discrimination by user, content, site, etc. The objective of this paper is to justify the idea that internet neutrality cannot ensure equality in the ethical sense. Net neutrality can only maintain technological equality. The author proposes the argument that technological equality is not the same as ethical equality. Treating all content, which is not homogenous, equally leads to unethical activities. It hampers an individual’s relationship with his or her society and, thereby, blocks the foundation for social justice. Accordingly, the neutrality principle ignores the idea of social justice and fails to protect human rights. Hence, it cannot be ethically justifiable in its present form.
KeywordsInternet neutrality Equivocation Technical equality Non-discrimination Right
- 2.Anand, U. 2015. Background and legal aspects of the ban on internet pornography. The Indian Express.Google Scholar
- 4.Beckett, D. 2000. Internet technology. In Internet Ethics, ed. D. Langford, 73–75. London: Palgrave Publication.Google Scholar
- 6.Boatright, J.R. 2007. Ethics and the Conduct of Business. India: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- 9.Cook, D. 2006. Criminal and Social Justice, 60–72. London: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
- 10.Copy, I.M., C. Cohen, P. Jetli, and M. Prabhakar. 2006. Introduction to Logic, 386–387. New Delhi: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- 11.Craven, A. 2012. Social justice and higher education. Perspectives 16(1): 23–28.Google Scholar
- 15.Kuruvilla, C. 2015. Why 12 Top Religious Leaders Are Proud To Support Net Neutrality. The Huffington Post, Retrieved from (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/12/religious-leaders-on-net-neutrality_n_7562454.html?ir=India&adsSiteOverride=in).
- 16.Linden, H.V.D. 1988. Kantian Ethics and Socialism, 15. Cambridge: Hacket Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- 19.Narayan, V. 2013. Most online criminals are educated youths: report. The Times of India, Retrieved from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Most-online-criminals-are-educated-youths-Report/articleshow/20672686.cms.
- 24.Singh, P.J. 2016. What free basics did not intend to do. The Hindu 11. http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/What-Free-Basics-did-not-intend-to-do/article14470921.ece.
- 26.Travis, A. 2015. Crime rates to rise by 40% after inclusion of cyber offences. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/oct/15/crime-rate-rise-cyber-offences.
- 27.The Economic Times. 2015. Cyber crimes in India likely to double to 3 lakh in 2015: Report.Google Scholar
- 28.TRAI, Gazette of India, February 08, 2016. (Accessed from http://www.trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/WhatsNew/Documents/Regulation_Data_Service.pdf).
- 32.Weckert, J. 2000. What is new or unique about internet activities. In Internet Ethics, ed. D. Langford, 61–62. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar