Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sexual and Body Esteem in People with Spinal Cord Damage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality and Disability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual esteem is the positive regard for and confidence in an individual’s capacity to experience their sexuality in a satisfying and enjoyable way. Body esteem is the overall positive or negative evaluation of one’s body. Physical disability can have an adverse impact on both of these constructs. This project aimed to study the sexual esteem and body esteem in people with spinal cord damage (SCD). A comprehensive survey (August 2013–June 2014) was conducted of people with SCD (n = 154) living in the community, Australia. The survey included the Physical Disability Sexual and Body Esteem (PDSBE) scale. There were 146 participants who completed the PDSBE scale. Most were male (n = 100, 68.5%), average age of 47.9 years (SD = 13.5) and a median of 11 years (IQR 4–20) post SCD. The mean PDSBE score was 22.2 (SD = 7.9). There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.35) between the total PDSBE score and quality of life as a whole (P = .001) and a weak correlation (r = 0.22) with function (P = 0.01). There was no significant influence of gender or sexual orientation on PDSBE scores. However, people with non-traumatic SCD and paraplegia tended to have higher scores (non-traumatic SCD mean 25.8 [SD = 6.7] vs traumatic SCD mean 21.0 [SD = 8.0], P = .002; paraplegia mean 23.4 [8.1] vs tetraplegia mean 20.6 [7.5], P = 0.04). The mean PDSBE scores for the people with SCD in this study were lower than that reported for non-SCD disabled (mean 25.9, SD = 9.2). Sexual and body esteem are psychological-sexual constructs that complement existing outcomes used when evaluating the impact of SCD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Snell, W.E.J., Fisher, T.D., Walters, A.S.: The multidimensional sexuality questionnaire. An objective self-report measure of psychological tendencies associated with human sexuality. Ann Sex Res 6, 27–55 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayer, J.D., Eisenberg, M.G.: Mental represnetation of the body: stability and change in response to illness and disability. Rehabil Psychol 33, 155–171 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hassouneh, D., Hanson, G., Perrin, N., McNeff, E.: Abuse and health on individuals with spinal cord injury and dysfunction. J Rehabil 74, 3–9 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taleporos, G., McCabe, M.P.: Development and validation of the Physical Disability Sexual and Body Esteem scale. Sex Disabil 20(3), 159–176 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Elliott, S.: Sexual dysfunction in women with spinal cord injury. In: Lin, V.W. (ed.) Spinal cord medicine: principles and practice, 2nd edn, pp. 429–437. Demos Medical Publishing, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elliott, S.: Sexual dysfunction in men with spinal cord injury. In: Lin, V.W. (ed.) Spinal cord medicine: principles and practice, 2nd edn, pp. 409–428. Demos Medical Publishing, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Biering-Sorensen, F., Alexander, M.S., Elliott, S., Popolo, G.D., Previnaire, J.G., Velez, A.R.: Sexuality and fertility management. In: Chhabra, H.S. (ed.) ISCoS textbook on comprehensive management of spinal cord injuries, pp. 613–635. Wolters Kluwer, New Delhi (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dillman, D., Smyth, J., Christian, L.: Internet, phone, mail and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. New, P.W., Currie, K.E.: Development of a comprehensive survey of sexuality issues including a self-report version of the International Spinal Cord Injury sexual function basic datasets. Spinal Cord 54, 584–591 (2016)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. New, P.W., Seddon, M., Redpath, C., Currie, K.E., Warren, N.: Recommendations for spinal rehabilitation professionals regarding sexual education needs and preferences of people with spinal cord dysfunction: a mixed methods study. Spinal Cord 54, 1203–1209 (2016)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. New, P.W.: Secondary conditions in a community sample of people with spinal cord damage. J Spinal Cord Med 39, 665–670 (2016)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Abramson, C., McBride, K., Konnyu, K., Elliott, S.: Sexual health outcome measures for individuals with a spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord 46, 320–324 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McCabe, M.P., Taleporos, G.: Sexual esteem, sexual satisfaction, and sexual behavior among people with physical disability. Arch Sex Behav 32, 359–369 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Charlifue, S., Post, M.W., Biering-Sørensen, F., Catz, A., Dijkers, M., Geyh, S., et al.: International spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set. Spinal Cord 50(9), 672–675 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Post, M.W.M., Adriaansen, J.J.E., Charlifue, S., Biering-Sørensen, F., van Asbeck, F.W.A.: Good validity of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set. Spinal Cord 54, 314–318 (2016)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kreuter, M., Sullivan, M., Siösteen, A.: Sexual adjustment after spinal cord injury (SCI) focusing on partner experiences. Paraplegia 32(4), 225–235 (1994)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kreuter, M., Sullivan, M., Siösteen, A.: Sexual adjustment after spinal cord injury-comparison of partner experiences in pre- and postinjury relationships. Paraplegia 32, 759–770 (1994)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jaeschke, R., Singer, J., Guyatt, G.H.: Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10, 407–415 (1989)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guyatt, G.H., Osoba, D., Wu, A.W., Wyrwick, K.W., Norman, G.R.: Clinical significance consensus meeting G. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clinic Proc 77, 371–383 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Norman, G.R., Sloan, J.A., Wyrwick, K.W.: Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41, 582–592 (2003)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Colton, T.: Statistics in medicine. Little, Brown and Company, Boston (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Taleporos, G., McCabe, M.P.: The relationship between the severity and duration of physical disability and body esteem. Health Psychol Rev 20, 637–650 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Strassberg, D.S., Lowe, K.: Volunteer bias in sexuality research. Arch Sex Behav 24(4), 369–382 (1995)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. New, P.W., Simmonds, F., Stevermuer, T.: A population-based study comparing traumatic spinal cord injury and non-traumatic spinal cord injury using a National rehabilitation database. Spinal Cord 49(3), 397–403 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hocaloski, S., Elliott, S., Brotto, L.A., Breckon, E., McBride, K.: A mindfulness psychoeducational group intervention targeting sexual adjustment for women with multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Sex Disabil 34, 183–198 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Kim Proudlove (nee Currie, Caulfield Hospital, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia), Vanessa Hamilton (previously Sexual Health Nurse Consultant, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia) and the following people with SCD provided comments and suggestions regarding the survey questions: Lynne Panayiotis, Georgina Fiorentino, Mark Hanson, Mike Short, and two others who wished to remain anonymous. Merilyn Seddon (Monash University, Melbourne, Australia) and the following organizations are thanked for their assistance with distribution of the survey to potential participants: AQA (Victoria), Spinal Injuries Association (Queensland), Spinal Cord Injuries Australia (New South Wales), Paraplegic-Quadriplegic Association of WA, ParaQuad NSW, Paraplegic and Quadriplegic Association of South Australia, Spinal Cord Injury Network (Australia). The author would especially like to thank all the participants who completed the survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter W. New.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethics standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was implied by the participants completing the study questionnaire after they read the participant information and consent document.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

New, P.W. Sexual and Body Esteem in People with Spinal Cord Damage. Sex Disabil 37, 3–14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-018-09553-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-018-09553-4

Keywords

Navigation