Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping French People’s Views Regarding Sexual Assistance to People with Physical Disabilities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality and Disability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study mapped French lay people’s positions regarding sexual assistance to people with physical disability. A sample of 238 adults living in the south of France, aged 18–67 years, was presented with a set of 30 vignettes that depicted a situation in which a minor who, as a result of an accident was quadriplegic, expressed his/her sexual needs to a nurse who arranged an encounter with an assistant at the hospital. The scenarios in the vignettes were created by orthogonally combining the levels of three factors: Patient’ gender × Assistant’s identity (same gender nurse, opposite gender nurse, opposite gender nurse who has been trained in sexual assistance, prostitute, or former boyfriend/girlfriend) × Parent’s attitude (agree with the procedure, agree with the procedure and financially compensate the assistant, disagree with the procedure). Through cluster analysis, five qualitatively different positions were found: (a) never very acceptable (21% of the sample), (b) depends on the assistant’s identity (13%), (c) non-remunerated assistance (14%), (d) parents’ agreement (8%), and (e) always quite acceptable (28%). Seventeen percent of the participants were undetermined. Religious involvement had a strong effect. The quite always acceptable position was above found among male atheists, and the never acceptable position was above all found among participants who were either regular attendees to religious celebrations or members of the less educated segment of society. Regular attendees with tertiary education tended to be undetermined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization: Promoting sexual and reproductive health for persons with disabilities. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/general/9789241598682/en/index.html (2009). Accessed Oct 2016

  2. Kaufman, M., Silverberg, C., Odette, F.: The Ultimate Guide to Sex and Disability: For All of Us Who Live with Disabilities, Chronic Pain and Illness, 2nd edn. Cleis Press, San Francisco (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sakellariou, D.: If not the disability, then what? Barriers to reclaiming sexuality following spinal cord injury. Sex. Disabil. 24, 101–111 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shuttleworth, R., Sanders, T. (eds.): Sex and Disability: Politics, Identity and Access. The Disability Press, Leeds (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chait, M.: The last taboo for women with physical disabilities: personal assistance services, sexuality and sexual expression. Cult. Health Sex. 7(sup1), S20–S21 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vansteenwegen, A., Jans, I., Revell, A.: Sexual experience of women with a physical disability: a comparative study. Sex. Disabil. 21, 283–290 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McCabe, M., Cummins, R.A., Deeks, A.: Sexuality and quality of life among people with physical disability. Sex. Disabil. 18, 115–123 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bahner, J.: Sexual professionalism: for whom? The case of sexual facilitation in Swedish personal assistance services. Disabil. Soc. 30, 788–801 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gammino, R.M., Faccio, E., Cipolletta, S.: Sexual assistance in Italy: an explorative study on the opinions of people with disabilities and would-be assistants. Sex. Disabil. 34, 157–170 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, C.: Paying for sex; the many obstacles in the way of men with learning disabilities using prostitutes. Br. J. Learn. Disabil. 41, 121–127 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aloni, R., Keren, O., Katz, S.: Sex therapy surrogate partners for individuals with very limited functional ability following traumatic brain injury. Sex. Disabil. 25, 125–134 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. European Platform Sexual Assistance: What is sexual assistance? http://www.epseas.eu/en/page/181. Assessed 25 Sept 2018

  13. Everett, B.: Ethically managing sexual activity in long-term care. Sex. Disabil. 25, 21–27 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sakellariou, D.: Sexuality and disability: a discussion on care of the self. Sex. Disabil. 30, 187–197 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stack, S., Adamczyk, A., Cao, L.: Survivalism and public opinion on criminality: a cross-national analysis of prostitution. Soc. Forces 88, 1703–1726 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. European Parliament: Directive 2011/92 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography. Off. J. Eur. Union 335, 1–14 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ministry of Social Affairs and Integration: Guidelines on Sexuality—Regardless of Disability. Socialministeriet, Copenhagen (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Di Nucci, E.: Sexual rights and disability. J. Med. Ethics 37, 158–161 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Swango-Wilson, A.: Caregiver perception of sexual behaviors of individuals with intellectual disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 26, 75–81 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morales, G., Lopez Ramirez, E., Mullet, E.: Acceptability of sexual relationships among people with learning disabilities: family and professional caregivers’ views in Mexico. Sex. Disabil. 29, 165–174 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Meaney-Tavares, R., Gavidia-Payne, S.: Staff characteristics and attitudes towards the sexuality of people with intellectual disability. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 37, 269–273 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chirawu, P., Hanass-Hancock, J., Aderemi, T.J., de Reus, L., Henken, A.S.: Protect or enable? Teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding provision of sexuality education to learners with disability in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Sex. Disabil. 32, 259–277 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Balderian, N.: Sexual abuse of people with developmental disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 9, 323–335 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sobsey, D., Doe, T.: Patterns of sexual abuse and assault. Sex. Disabil. 9, 243–259 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sullivan, P., Knutson, J.: Maltreatment and disabilities: a population based epidemiological study. Child Abuse Negl. 22, 271–288 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gil-Llario, M.D., Morell-Mengual, V., Ballester-Arnal, R., Díaz-Rodríguez, I.: The experience of sexuality in adults with intellectual disability. J. Intel. Disabil. Res. 62, 72–80 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McConkey, R., Leavey, G.: Irish attitudes to sexual relationships and people with intellectual disability. Br. J. Learn. Disabil. 41, 181–188 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hasson-Ohayon, I., Hertz, I., Vilchinsky, N., Kravetz, S.: Attitudes toward the sexuality of persons with physical versus psychiatric disabilities. Rehab. Psychol. 59, 236–241 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anderson, N.H.: Moral Science. Psychology Press, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Anderson, N.H.: Unified Social Cognition. Psychology Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Esterle, M., Muñoz Sastre, M.T., Mullet, E.: Acceptability of sexual relationships between elderly people residing in nursing homes. Sex. Disabil. 29, 157–164 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hofmans, J., Mullet, E.: Towards unveiling individual differences in different stages of information processing: a clustering-based approach. Qual. Quant. 47, 555–564 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Petersen, J.L., Hyde, J.S.: A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychol. Bull. 136, 21–38 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kraaykamp, G.: Trends and countertrends in sexual permissiveness: three decades of attitude change in the Netherlands 1965–1995. J. Marriage Family 66, 225–236 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Robey, K.L., Beckley, L., Kirschner, M.: Implicit infantilizing attitudes about disability. J. Dev. Phys. Disabil. 18, 441–453 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Brown, H.: Safeguarding Adults and Children with Disabilities Against Abuse. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kahn, T.: “Cain”, nouveau label méchant. Retrieved October 21, 2016 from http://www.liberation.fr/ecrans/2012/10/05/cain-nouveau-label-mechant_958530 (2012)

  38. Handicap France. Accompagnement sexuel en France: la formation qui fait débat! Retrieved November 15, 2016 from https://www.myhandicap.com/en/information-disability-chonical-illness/relationships-and-sexuality/sexuality-and-disability/sexual-assistance-for-disabled-people/

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the University of Nice, by the Federal University of Toulouse (U2J, CNRS, EPHE), by the CRPPS (Centre d’Etude et de Recherche en Psychopathologie et en Psychologie de la Santé), and by the Ethics and Work laboratory of the Institute of Advanced Studies. The authors thank Elodie Boucly, Anouchka Foucault et Sophie Anne Jérémie for their help in gathering the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nice, Sophia Antipolis, France

    Michelle Girard

  2. Jean-Jaurès University, Toulouse, France

    Maria Teresa Muñoz Sastre

  3. Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE), Paris, France

    Etienne Mullet

Authors
  1. Michelle Girard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Teresa Muñoz Sastre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Etienne Mullet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etienne Mullet.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Girard, M., Muñoz Sastre, M.T. & Mullet, E. Mapping French People’s Views Regarding Sexual Assistance to People with Physical Disabilities. Sex Disabil 37, 109–121 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-018-09552-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-018-09552-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation