Correlation between the CiteScore and Journal Impact Factor of top-ranked library and information science journals

Abstract

Elsevier’s Scopus CiteScore may be a practically more useful journal-based metric than Clarivate Analytics’ Journal Impact Factor (JIF) because it is open and transparent about the background data used to derive the metric and because it confers a metric to Scopus-indexed journals that do not carry a JIF. In this study, we wanted to assess whether the CiteScore and JIF of library and information science (LIS) journals was in any way correlated. Drawing on a sample of 212 LIS journals indexed in Scopus and carrying a CiteScore, the top quartile was compared with 43 top-ranking JIF-carrying LIS journals. The average CiteScore (3.27) of the 43 LIS journals was higher than their average JIF (2.425), indicating different citation patterns in Scopus and Web of Science, respectively. Their CiteScore and JIF showed a strong significant positive correlation (r = 0.787; rs = 0.828). The relationship between CiteScore and JIF is valid between 42.6 and 68.6% of all 43 top-ranked LIS journals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Brown, T., & Gutman, S. A. (2019a). Impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy,26(7), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2018.1473489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, T., & Gutman, S. A. (2019b). A comparison of bibliometric indicators in occupational therapy journals published in English. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy,86(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417419831453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernandez-Llimos, F. (2018). Differences and similarities between Journal Impact Factor and CiteScore. Pharmacy Practice, 16(2), 1282. https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2018.02.1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. James, C., Colledge, L., Meester, W., Azoulay, N., & Plume, A. (2019). CiteScore metrics: Creating journal metrics from the Scopus citation index. Learned Publishing,32(4), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Krauskopf, E. (2020). Sources without a CiteScore value: More clarity is required. Scientometrics,122(3), 1801–1812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03350-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liao, C. H., & Chen, M. (2018). Exploring knowledge patterns of library and information science journals within the field: A citation analysis from 2009 to 2016. Scientometrics,117(3), 1991–2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2925-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Okagbue, H. I., Adamu, P. I., Bishop, S. A., Obasi, E. C. M., & Akinola, A. O. (2019). Curve estimation models for estimation and prediction of impact factor and citescore using the journal percentiles: A case study of telecommunication journals. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering,15(14), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v15i14.11373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Okagbue, H. I., Bishop, S. A., Adamu, P. I., Opanuga, A. A., & Obasi, E. C. M. (2020). Analysis of percentiles of computer science, theory and methods journals: Citescore versus impact factor. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 40(1), 359-365. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.1.14866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Memon, A. R. (2017). CiteScore: a cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric? Scientometrics,111(1), 553–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2250-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Villaseñor-Almaraz, M., Islas-Serrano, J., Murata, C., & Roldan-Valadez, E. (2019). Impact factor correlations with Scimago Journal Rank, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, Eigenfactor Score, and the CiteScore in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging journals. La Radiologia Medica,124, 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-00996-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao, R.-Y., Wang, X., Liu, Z.-Z., Qi, Y.-K., Zhang, Z.-Y., & Chang, R. (2019). Research on the impact evaluation of academic journals based on altmetrics and citation indicators. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology,56(1), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed equally to the intellectual discussion underlying this paper, literature exploration, writing, data collection and analysis and interpretation, reviews and editing, and accept responsibility for the content of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest of relevance to this topic.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okagbue, H.I., Teixeira da Silva, J.A. Correlation between the CiteScore and Journal Impact Factor of top-ranked library and information science journals. Scientometrics 124, 797–801 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03457-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Citations
  • Clarivate Analytics
  • Journal-based metric
  • Journal Impact Factor (JIF)
  • Library and information science (LIS)
  • r (Pearson’s correlation coefficient)
  • rs (Spearman’s correlation coefficient)
  • R2, coefficient of determination