Although the overall analysis of the citations received by Nobel laureates in the scientific background of their Nobel Prize gives an overview of how and when Nobel-awarded discoveries have been achieved and published, it will be interesting to consider the number of mentions of each work co-authored by a Nobel winner in his Nobel Prize scientific background, the works co-authored by Nobel laureates and listed in Further Reading section of Nobel Prize scientific background, the author rank of Nobel laureates in papers cited in Nobel Prize scientific background and the citation and co-citation networks of the research works of Nobel winners to give in-depth explanations of the dynamics of Nobel Prize discoveries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
The study shows that Physical Review Letters published 28.5% of the Nobel Prize-awarded papers followed by the Astrophysical journal (11.2%), Science (5.6%) and Nature (4.7%).
Nature, 1995—Mentioned eight times.
Astrophysical Journal, 1984—Mentioned four times.
Astrophysical Journal, 1965—Mentioned three times.
Astrophysics and Space Science, 1970—Mentioned three times.
Astrophysical Journal, 1970—Mentioned three times.
Astrophysical Journal, 1982—Mentioned three times.
The journals that mostly published the 132 references of Nobel Prize scientific background having Nobel winners as first authors are Physical Review Letters (17.4%) then the Astrophysical journal (13.6%), Physical Review (8.3%) and Japanese Journal of Applied Physics (4.7%).
Arkhipov, D. B. (1999). Scientometric analysis of nature, the journal. Scientometrics,46(1), 51–72.
Bjørk, R. (2020). The journals in physics that publish Nobel Prize research. Scientometrics,122(2), 817–823.
Garfield, E. (1996). Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? BMJ,313(7054), 411–413.
Gates, A. J., Ke, Q., Varol, O., & Barabási, A.-L. (2019). Nature’s reach: Narrow work has broad impact. Nature,575(7781), 32–34.
Hadj Taieb, M. A., Ben Aouicha, M., & Turki, H. (2019). Paper co-citation analysis using semantic similarity measures. In 19th international conference on intelligent systems design and applications. MIRLabs.
Hagen, N. T. (2008). Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: Source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis. PLoS ONE,3(12), e4021.
Hu, Z., Lin, G., Sun, T., & Hou, H. (2017). Understanding multiply mentioned references. Journal of Informetrics,11(4), 948–958.
Hummon, N. P., & Dereian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory. Social Networks,11(1), 39–63.
Kajikawa, Y., & Takeda, Y. (2009). Citation network analysis of organic LEDs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,76(8), 1115–1123.
Pooladian, A., & Borrego, Á. (2017). Methodological issues in measuring citations in Wikipedia: A case study in Library and Information Science. Scientometrics,113(1), 455–464.
Sekercioglu, C. H. (2008). Quantifying coauthor contributions. Science,322(5900), 371.
Wagner, W. (2010). Steven Bird, Ewan Klein and Edward Loper: Natural language processing with Python, analyzing text with the natural language toolkit. Language Resources and Evaluation,44(4), 421–424.
Wan, X., & Liu, F. (2014). WL-index: Leveraging citation mention number to quantify an individual's scientific impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,65(12), 2509–2517.
Wen, F. (2019). Study on the research evolution of Nobel laureates 2018 based on self-citation network. Journal of Documentation,75(6), 1416–1431.
We thank Seyed Mohammad Jafar Jalali (Deakin University, Australia) and two other anonymous reviewers for providing useful comments and discussions about this output.
About this article
Cite this article
Turki, H., Hadj Taieb, M.A. & Ben Aouicha, M. Facts to consider when analyzing the references of Nobel Prize scientific background. Scientometrics 124, 787–790 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03456-y
- Nobel prize
- Scientific background
- Citation analysis