We developed quality indicators model for measuring human and social capital in the scientific and research communities, grounded in the complexity science. The model was implemented in two phases: in the first, we gathered initial data through the questionnaire designed for scientists and researchers; in the second, we fully analyzed all the respondents, according to the model—this included analysis of their CVs, with wider research of their data in all publicly available sources. The research sample included 444 PhD holders, 202 in Homeland and 242 in Diaspora, all of them being of Serbian origin. Among the most significant findings are the facts that Serbian PhDs from its Diaspora, compared with those living in the Homeland, published 4 times more papers, 6 times more in journals with IF; were cited 15 times more, in 14 times more documents; had 13 times higher value of overall IF; had both 5 times higher ResearchGate scores and the h-index values. In achieving all these, they perceived their work in science and research in more entrepreneurial manner and used collaboration strategies: on average, they had 4 times more co-authors than PhDs in the Homeland. On the other hand, PhDs working and living in the Homeland (Serbia) demonstrated higher devotion to the interests of wider communities they belonged to, considered succession planning as more important, and generally felt more afraid of risks that current trends of our civilization, especially regarding the lack of sustainable management, may lead our entire humanity to some form of collapse.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Anand, H., & Haberer, J. (1978). Scientific and political orientation of American scientists. Research Policy,7, 27–46.
Archambault, É., Vignola-Gagné, É., Côté, G., Larivière, V., & Gingrasb, Y. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics,68, 329–342.
Auriol, L., Schaaper, M., & Felix, B. (2012). Mapping careers and mobility of doctorate holders: Draft guidelines, model questionnaire and indicators—Third Edition. OECD science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2012/07, OECD Publishing.
Bagatelas, W. T., & Sergi, Bs. (2004). The Balkans ‘brain drain’—Its meaning and implications. SEER: Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe,6, 7–12.
Bar-Ilan, J. (2010). Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics,82, 495–506.
Barjak, F., & Robinson, S. (2008). International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences: impact on research performance. Social Geography,3, 23–36.
Basu, A. (2012). Some differences in research publications of Indian scientists in India and the diaspora, 1986–2010. Scientometrics,94, 1007–1019.
Baudrillard, J. (1991). The precession of simulacra. In D. Hlynka & J. C. Belland (Eds.), Paradigms regained: The uses of illuminative, semiotic, and post-modern criticism as modes of inquiry in educational technology: A book of readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
Baudrillard, J. (1995). Simulacra and simulation, histories of cultural materialism (The Body, in theory). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Becker, G. (1962). Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy,70, 9–49.
Becker, G. (1994). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ben-Porath, Y. (1980). The F-connection: Families, friends and firms and the organization of exchange. Population and Development Review,6, 1–30.
Benz, A. O. (2005). Culture in a new scientific worldview. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies,17, 123–138.
Boa, K. D., & Bowman, R. M., Jr. (2006). Faith has its reasons: Integrative approaches to defending the christian faith. Downers Grove: Green Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1983). Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital. In R. Kreckel (Ed.), Soziale Ungleichheiten (Soziale Welt, Sonderheft 2). Goettingen: Otto Schartz & Co.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1975). The problem with human capital theory—A marxian critique. American Economic Review,65, 74–82.
Boyle, M., & Kitchin, R. (2008). Towards an Irish diaspora strategy: A position paper. NIRSA Working Paper 37.
Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy,33, 599–616.
Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management,22, 716–740.
Brinkerhoff, J. (2004). Digital diasporas and international development: Afghan-Americans and the reconstruction of Afghanistan. Public Administration and Development,24, 397–413.
Brinkerhoff, J. (2011). David and Goliath: Diaspora organizations as partners in the development industry. Public Administration and Development,31, 37–49.
Brown, M. G. (1996). Keeping the score: Using the right metrics to drive world-class performance. New York: Quality Resources.
Campbell, S. M., Braspenning, J., Hutchison, A., & Marshall, M. (2002). Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Quality and Safety in Health Care,11, 358–364.
Canibano, C., & Bozeman, B. (2009). Curriculum vitae method in science policy and research evaluation: the state-of-the-art. Research Evaluation,18, 86–94.
Carroll, R. (2003). At the border between chaos and order: What psychotherapy and neuroscience have in common. In J. Corrigall & H. Wilkinson (Eds.), Revolutionary connections: Psychotherapy and neuroscience. London: Karnac.
Carvalho, J. J. (2006). Overview of the structure of a scientific worldview. Journal of Religion & Science,41, 113–124.
Chattopadhyay, S. (2012). Education and economics: Disciplinary evolution and policy discourse. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Colbert, B. A. (2004). The complex resource-based view: Implications for theory and practice in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review,3, 341–358.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology,Supplement 94, S95–S120.
Conti, T. (2006). Quality thinking and systems thinking. The TQM Magazine,18, 297–308.
Cross, N. (1993). Science and design methodology: A review. Research in Engineering Design,5, 63–69.
Djuric, M., & Filipovic, J. (2015). Human and social capital management based on complexity paradigm: Implications for various stakeholders and sustainable development. Sustainable Development,23, 343–354.
Djuric, M., Filipovic, J., & Komazec, S. (2019). Reshaping the future of social metrology: Utilizing quality indicators to develop complexity-based scientific human and social capital measurement model. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02217-6.
Dodani, S., & LaPorte, R. E. (2005). Brain drain from developing countries: How can brain drain be converted into wisdom gain? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,98, 487–491.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfeld, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook’friends’: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,12, 1143–1168.
Engels, T. C. E., Ossenblok, T. L. B., & Spruyt, E. H. J. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009. Scientometrics,93, 373–390.
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal,22, 338–342.
Fell, C. B., & König, C. J. (2016). Is there a gender difference in scientific collaboration? A scientometric examination of co-authorships among industrial–organizational psychologists. Scientometrics,108, 113–141.
Filipovic, J. (2012). Management of a diaspora virtual university as a complex organization: serbian diaspora virtual university: An emerging leadership of a nation. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
Filipović, J., Devjak, S., & Putnik, G. (2012). Knowledge based economy: The role of expert diaspora. Panoeconomicus,59, 369–386.
Finardi, U., & Buratti, A. (2016). Scientific collaboration framework of BRICS countries: An analysis of international coauthorship. Scientometrics,109, 433–446.
Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., & Maisano, D. (2007). Management by measurement: Designing key indicators and performance measurement systems. Berlin: Springer.
Frolov, I. T. (2003). Vvedenie v filosofiyu, 3-e izd. prerab. i dop. Moscow: Respublika.
Fukuyama, F. (2000). Social capital and civil society. In Working Paper WP/00/74. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Gallopin, G. (2002). Planning for resilience: Scenarios, surprises, and branch points. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformation in human and nature systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Gerson, L. L. (1964). The hyphenate in recent american politics and diplomacy. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
Glänzel, W. (2001a). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980–1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends,50, 461–473.
Glänzel, W. (2001b). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics,51, 69–115.
Glänzel, W., & Schlemmer, B. (2007). National research profiles in a changing Europe (1983–2003) An exploratory study of sectoral characteristics in the Triple Helix. Scientometrics,70, 267–275.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Godin, B., & Dore, C. (2005). Measuring the impacts of science: Beyond the economic dimension. INRS: Montreal.
Goudard, M., & Lubrano, M. (2010). Human capital, social capital and scientific production. Paper presented at the conference “Measurement and evaluation of academic research performance: Policy implications”, Portugal.
Grant, A. M., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (2009). The hot and cool of death awareness at work: Mortality cues, aging, and self-protective and prosocial motivations. Academy of Management Review,34, 600–622.
Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2004). The seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational Leadership,61, 8–13.
Harris, S. (2005). Rethinking academic identities in neo-liberal times. Teaching in Higher Education,10, 421–433.
Harzing, A.-W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics,106, 787–804.
Hemlin, S. (2006). Creative knowledge environments for research groups in biotechnology. The influence of leadership and organizational support in universities and business companies. Scientometrics,67, 121–142.
Imran, S., Alam, K., & Beaumont, N. (2014). Reinterpreting the definition of sustainable development for a more ecocentric reorientation. Sustainable Development,22, 134–144.
Ionescu, D. (2006). Engaging diasporas as development partners for home and destination countries: Challenges for policymakers. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.
ISO. (2018). ISO 30414:2018—Human resource management—Guidelines for internal and external human capital reporting. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
Jonkers, K., & Tijssen, R. (2008). Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics,77, 309–333.
Kaufmann, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kazlauskiene, A., & Rinkevicius, L. (2006). Lithuanian “brain drain” causes: Push and pull factors. Engineering Economics,46, 27–37.
Klein, C. (2004). Crouching tiger, hidden dragon: A diasporic reading. Cinema Journal,43, 18–42.
Kuhn, L. (2008). Complexity and educational research: A critical reflection. Educational Philosophy and Theory,40, 177–189.
Kuhn, L., & Woog, R. (2005). Vortical postmodern ethnography: Introducing a complexity approach to systemic social theorizing. System Research and Behavioral Science,22, 139–150.
Kuznetsov, Y. N. (2006). Diaspora networks and the international migration of skills. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Kwon, D.-B. (2009). Human capital and its measurement. Paper presented to The 3rd OECD World Forum on “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy”, Busan, Korea.
Kyriacou, G. A. (1991). Level and growth effects of human capital: a cross country study of the convergence hypothesis. Working Paper 91-26. New York: C.V. Starr Centre.
Lazega, E., Mounier, L., Jourda, M.-T., & Stofer, R. (2006). Organizational vs. personal social capital in scientists’ performance: A multi-level network study of elite French cancer researchers (1996–1998). Scientometrics,67, 27–44.
Levin, S. (1999). Fragile dominion: Complexity and the commons. Reading, PA: Perseus.
Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2007). The scientometrics of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations (Introduction to the topical issue). Scientometrics,70, 207–222.
Leydesdorff, L., & Van Den Besselaar, P. (1997). Scientometrics and communication theory: Towards theoretically informed indicators. Scientometrics,38, 155–174.
Lin, N. (2000). Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociology,29, 785–795.
Lukovits, I., & Vinkler, P. (1995). Correct credit distribution: A model for sharing credit among coauthors. Social Indicators Research,36, 91–98.
Lyotard, J. F. (1993). The postmodern explained: Correspondence, 1982–1985. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Maddocks, J., & Beaney, M. (2002). See the invisible and intangible. Knowledge Management, March 2002, 16–17.
Maggino, F. (2017a). Dealing with syntheses in a system of indicators. In F. Maggino (Ed.), Complexity in society: From indicators construction to their synthesis. Berlin: Springer.
Maggino, F. (2017b). Developing indicators and managing the complexity. In F. Maggino (Ed.), Complexity in society: From indicators construction to their synthesis. Berlin: Springer.
Magner, T. (2006). Digraphia in the territories of the Croats and Serbs. International Journal of the Sociology of Language,2001, 11–26.
Marmolejo-Leyva, R., Perez-Angon, M. A., & Russell, J. M. (2015). Mobility and international collaboration: Case of the Mexican scientific diaspora. PLoS ONE,10, e0126720.
Matthews, W. (1952). The latinisation of cyrillic characters. The Slavonic and East European Review,30, 531–548.
McNeill, W. H. (1998). History and the scientific worldview. History & Theory,37, 1–13.
Mendoza, P. (2012). The role of context in academic capitalism: The industry-friendly department case. The Journal of Higher Education,83, 26–48.
Milosevic, D., Filipovic, J., Djuric, M., & Dobrota, M. (2014). Benchmarking diaspora performance as an input for policy makers: A comparative statistical analysis. Current Science,107, 1253–1259.
Monteleone, S., & Torrisi, B. (2012). Geographical analysis of the academic brain drain in Italy. Scientometrics,93, 413–430.
Muscanell, N., & Utz, S. (2017). Social networking for scientists: An analysis on how and why academics use ResearchGate. Online Information Review,41, 744–759.
Naugle, D. K. (2002). Worldview: The history of a concept. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A Review. Scientometrics,66, 81–100.
NSF. (1957). Basic research: A national resource. NSF 57-35. Washington: U. S. Government Printing Office.
OECD. (2005). New fields of science classification of the Frascati manual. OECD NESTI, June 2005.
Ostriker, J. P., Kuh, C. V., & Voytuk, J. A. (2003). Assessing research-doctorate programs: A methodology study. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Palmberg, K. (2009). Complex adaptive systems as metaphors for organizational management. Learning Organization,16, 483–498.
Palmer, G. B. (1996). Toward a theory of cultural linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Pavitt, K. (1998). The social shaping of the national science base. Research Policy,27, 793–805.
Plant, R. W., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and the effects of selfconsciousness, self-awareness and ego-involvement: An investigation of internally controlling styles. Journal of Personality,53, 435–449.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics,28, 664–683.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Ribeiro, L. C., Rapini, M. S., Silva, L. A., & Albuquerque, E. M. (2017). Growth patterns of the network of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics,114, 159–179.
Roeser, R. W., & Peck, S. C. (2009). An education in awareness: self, motivation, and self-regulated learning in contemplative perspective. Educational Psychologist,44, 119–136.
Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N., & Watkinson, A. (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing,24, 183–195.
Sabatier, P. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy,6, 21–48.
Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy,30, 509–532.
Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics,9, 281–291.
Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1990). International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985. Scientometrics,19, 3–10.
Schuller, T. (2007). Reflections on the use of social capital. Review of Social Economy,65, 11–28.
Schutlz, T. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review,51, 1–17.
Sciacovelli, L., & Plebani, M. (2009). The IFCC Working Group on laboratory errors and patient safety. Clinica Chimica Acta,404, 79–85.
Shain, Y. (1999). Marketing the American creed abroad: Diasporas in the U.S. and their homelands. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sharma, D. (2014). Bridging human capital and social capital theories. In M. Russ (Ed.), Value creation, reporting, and signaling for human capital and human assets. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sheffer, G. (1986). Modern diasporas in international politics. London: Croom Helm.
Shin, J. C., & Cummings, W. K. (2010). Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: research preference, collaboration, and time on research. Scientometrics,85, 581–594.
Skute, I. (2019). Opening the black box of academic entrepreneurship: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics,120, 237–265.
Smith, R. C. (2003). Diasporic membership in historical perspective: Comparative insights from the Mexican, Italian and Polish Cases. The International Migration Review,37, 724–759.
Stacey, R. D. (1992). Managing the unknowable: Strategic boundaries between order and chaos in organizations. Hoboken: Wiley.
Stark, B. (2009). A case study of complex adaptive systems theory—Sustainable global governance: The singular challenge of the twenty-first century. In WISDOM RISC Research Paper 5. Slovenia: University of Ljubljana.
Stephan, P. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature,34, 1199–1235.
Taguchi, G. (1987). System of experimental design: Engineering methods to optimize quality and minimize costs. White Plains, NY: Kraus International Publications.
Tang, E., Liu, F., Sun, J., & Haider, Z. (2013). The relationship between scientists and science: Knowledge-based innovation output. Scientometrics,98, 1827–1835.
UNI. (2003). UNI 11097: Quality management—Quality indicators and quality management synoptical tables—General guidelines. Milano: Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione.
Van Eijnatten, F. M. (2004). Chaordic systems thinking. The Learning Organization,11, 430–449.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (1997). Scientometrics: State-of-the-art. Scientometrics,38, 205–218.
Velema, T. A. (2012). The contingent nature of brain gain and brain circulation: Their foreign context and the impact of return scientists on the scientific community in their country of origin. Scientometrics,93, 893–913.
Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Walter, S., Schmidt, A., & Walter, A. (2016). Patenting rationales of academic entrepreneurs in weak and strong organizational regimes. Research Policy,45, 533–545.
WCED. (1987). Towards sustainable development. In Our common future. Chapter 2. Retrieved July 3, 2019 from, http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm.
Werbner, P. (2002). The place which is diaspora: Citizenship, religion and gender in the making of chaordic transnationalism. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,28, 119–133.
Westermann, O., Ashby, J., & Pretty, J. (2005). Gender and social capital: The importance of gender differences for the maturity and effectiveness of natural resource management groups. World Development,33, 1783–1799.
Wilson, B. G. (1997). The postmodern paradigm. In C. Dills & A. Romoszowski (Eds.), Instructional development paradigms (pp. 297–309). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Winkler, D. R. (1987). Screening models and education. In G. Psacharopoulos (Ed.), Economics of education: Research and studies. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Winter, R. (2009). Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,31, 121–131.
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. World Bank Research Observer,15, 225–249.
Yang, K., & Meho, L. I. (2006). Citation analysis: A comparison Of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. Paper presented at the 69th annual meeting of the American society for information science and technology (ASIST), USA.
Zhelyazkova, A., Damjanovski, I., Nechev, Z., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2019). European Union Conditionality in the Western Balkans: External Incentives and Europeanisation. In J. Džankić, S. Keil, & M. Kmezić (Eds.), The Europeanisation of the Western Balkans. New Perspectives on South-East Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
About this article
Cite this article
Djuric, M., Dobrota, M. & Filipovic, J. Complexity-based quality indicators for human and social capital in science and research: the case of Serbian Homeland versus Diaspora. Scientometrics 124, 303–328 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03428-2
- Quality indicators
- Complexity science
- Human capital
- Social capital
- Scientific and research communities
- PhD holders