Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 116, Issue 3, pp 2019–2052 | Cite as

Comparative trends in research performance of the Russian universities

  • Anna A. Avanesova
  • Tatyana A. Shamliyan
Article
  • 321 Downloads

Abstract

We analyzed comparative trends in research performance of the Russian institutions based on the quantitative and qualitative data available in the international SciVal, Scopus, web of science and the national Russian databases from 2012 to December 2017. Russian Federation represented 2.0% of the world population and 2% of the researchers while accounting to 2.2% of the world publications (14th place in the world scholarly output) with overall field-weighted citation impact of 0.75. Scholarly output of the Russian authors increased by 79%, field-weighted citation impact by 12% and outputs in top citation percentiles by 21% but without a statistically significant positive association between higher investment in research and development and the increase the national GDP. Scholarly output for the Russian publications in mathematics, physics and astronomy are among 5 top countries. However, field-weighted mass media impact, the number of citations per publication, citations per author and per publication, metrics of international collaboration and the academic–corporation collaboration and economic impact of the Russian research remain low. Routine analysis of the research performance and economic impact of R&D expenditure should be reflected in transparent distribution of state research funding. Legal aspects of the international research must be developed to ensure a complete integration of the Russian science into international research activities.

Keywords

Academic institutions Productivity Internationalization Russian Federation Artificial intelligence 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abankina, I., Aleskerov, F., Belousova, V., Gokhberg, L., Kiselgof, S., Petrushchenko, V., et al. (2016). From equality to diversity: Classifying Russian universities in a performance oriented system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103(Supplement C), 228–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldieri, L., Kotsemir, M., & Vinci, C. P. (2017). The impact of research collaboration on academic performance: An empirical analysis for some European countries. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.05.003.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, C., & Magipervas, A. (2015). Features of the Advancement of Science as an Integral Part of the National Innovation System in Modern Russia. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166(Supplement C), 480–487.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Smart Specialization as an innovation-driven strategy for economic diversification: Examples from Scandinavian regions. Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers (im Druck). Google Scholar.Google Scholar
  5. Bolotov, V., Kvelidze-Kuznetsova, N., Laptev, V., & Morozova, S. (2014). The h-Index in the Russian Science Citation Index. Educational Studies, 1, 241–262.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, K., Zhang, Y., Zhu, G., & Mu, R. (2017). Do research institutes benefit from their network positions in research collaboration networks with industries or/and universities? Technovation.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.10.005.Google Scholar
  7. Colledge, L., & Verlinde, R. (2014). Scival metrics guidebook. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  8. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation. (2013). On measures of state support to the leading universities of the Russian Federation in order to increase their competitiveness among the world’s leading research and educational centers. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_143479/, No. 211(March 16 (Edited on 15.11.2017)).
  9. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation. (2012). On measures to implement state policy in the field of education and science. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_129346/, N 599(May 7).
  10. Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation., C. o. t. S. D. o. t. b. a. t. (2017). The Project of the Federal Law No. 15455-7 “On the Federal Budget for 2017 and on the plan period 2018-2019”. December(N 15455-7), http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=PRJ;n=158072#158070.
  11. Frenken, K., Heimeriks, G. J., & Hoekman, J. (2017). What drives university research performance? An analysis using the CWTS Leiden Ranking data. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 859–872.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galeev, I. H., & Galeeva, N. H. (2012). Experience in analyzing publication and publishing activity using Russian Index of Science citations. Educational Technologies and Society, 15(1), 594–608.Google Scholar
  13. Gorin, S. V., Koroleva, A. M., & Ovcharenko, N. A. (2016). The Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) as a new trend in scientific editing and publishing in Russia. European Science Editing, 42(3), 60–63.Google Scholar
  14. Ivanov, V., Libkind, A., & Markusova, V. (2014). Publication activity and research cooperation between higher education institutions and the Russian Academy of Sciences. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 84(1), 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirillova, O. V., Soloshenko, NS., (2012). Comaprative analysis of the publication and citation activity between the Russian Federation and the countries of Eastern Europe. Educational Studies, (1), 148–175.Google Scholar
  16. Kulmala, M., Lappalainen, H., Petäjä, T., Kurten, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Viisanen, Y., et al. (2015). Introduction: The Pan-Eurasian Experiment (PEEX)—Multidisciplinary, multiscale and multicomponent research and capacity-building initiative. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(22), 13085–13096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lane, J., & Bertuzzi, S. (2011). Measuring the results of science investments. Science, 331(6018), 678–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, X. (2011). Sources of external technology, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability in Chinese state-owned high-tech enterprises. World Development, 39(7), 1240–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li, F.-.F (2017). Opening the Google AI China Center. https://www.blog.google/topics/google-asia/google-ai-china-center/, December 13.
  20. Li, J., Wu, D., Li, J., & Li, M. (2017). A comparison of 17 article-level bibliometric indicators of institutional research productivity: Evidence from the information management literature of China. Information Processing and Management, 53(5), 1156–1170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2017.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lyagushkina, E., Bogatov, VV., (2017). Analysis of the effectiveness of fundamental scientific research: the publication aspect. Inter-Net Journal http://naukovedenie.ru , 9(2 (39)), https://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/10EVN217.pdf.
  22. Macilwain, C. (2010). What science is really worth: spending on science is one of the best ways to generate jobs and economic growth, say research advocates. But as Colin Macilwain reports, the evidence behind such claims is patchy. Nature, 465(7299), 682–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Markusova, V., Libkind, A., Mindeli, L., & Jansz, M. (2013). Research performance by Federal and National Research Universities and impact of competitive funding on their publication activity. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 7(2), 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyer D. (2017). Vladimir Putin Says Whoever Leads in Artificial Intelligence Will Rule the World. Fortune, September 4 (http://fortune.com/2017/09/04/ai-artificial-intelligence-putin-rule-world/).
  25. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nikolaev, V. (2013). Tools for assessing publication activity: Ways to improve. Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy, 5(94), 6–7.Google Scholar
  27. O’meara, S. (2015). At the very heart of progress. Nature, 528(7582), S179–S181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pislyakov, V., & Shukshina, E. (2014). Measuring excellence in Russia: Highly cited papers, leading institutions, patterns of national and international collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(11), 2321–2330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Poldin, O., Matveeva, N. N., Sterligov, I. A., & Yudkevich, M. M. (2017). Publication activity of universities: the effect of the project “5-100”. Educational Studies, 2, 10–35.Google Scholar
  30. Reznik-Zellen, R. (2016). Benchmarking with SciVal in Scholarly Communication and Research Services.Google Scholar
  31. Russian Academy of Science. (2013). The concept of development of the Russian Academy of Sciences until 2025. Meetings of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences, http://www.ras.ru/news/shownews.aspx?id=ebd03228-2fd1-4291-8af8-89f7c081547a.
  32. Salter, B., Zhou, Y., Datta, S., & Salter, C. (2016). Bioinformatics and the politics of innovation in the life sciences: science and the State in the United Kingdom, China, and India. Science, Technology and Human Values, 41(5), 793–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schiermeier, Q. (2010). Russia to boost university science. Nature Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  34. Sokolov, D. V. (2014). Publication activity as a scientometric indicator: Russian and International experience. Journal of Science. Innovation. Education, 15, 131–147.Google Scholar
  35. Tereshchenko, D., & Shcherbakov, V. S. (2017). Economic analysis of publication activity in Russia. The Economics of Education, 3, 123–135.Google Scholar
  36. The Directive of the Government of the Russian Federation. (2012). Plan of measures to develop and improve the competitiveness of the leading Russian universities among the world’s scientific and educational centers. http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=LAW&n=195286&fld=134&dst=1000000001,0&rnd=0.925379851922461#0, October 29(No. 2006-R).
  37. The Directive of the Government of the Russian Federation. (2013). Council on increasing the competitiveness of leading universities of the Russian Federation among the world’s leading scientific and educational centers. http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=EXP;n=613313#0, April (N 529-p).
  38. The UK’s Department for Business, E. I. S. B. (2017). International comparative performance of the UK research base 2016. elsevier.com/research-intelligence.Google Scholar
  39. Tretyakova, O., & Kabakov, E. A. (2013). Possibilities and prospects for using citation indexes in assessing the performance of a scientific institution. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 6(30), 189–200.Google Scholar
  40. Turko, T., Bakhturin, G., Bagan, V., Poloskov, S., & Gudym, D. (2016). Influence of the program “5–top 100” on the publication activity of Russian universities. Scientometrics, 109(2), 769–782.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2060-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. The Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. 5-100 Russian Academic Excellence Project. https://5top100.ru/universities/.
  42. Zemlin, A. I. (2017). Legal aspects of the assessment of the performance of research organizations of the Ministry of Defense of Russia. Russian Military Journal, 1, 149–157.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.North-Caucasian Federal UniversityStavropolRussian Federation
  2. 2.Quality Assurance, Evidence-Based Medicine CenterElsevierPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations