This article reports a study on the publications of book reviews by researchers from USA, Germany, Japan, China, and India. The Web of Science database was used to obtain the data concerning the publications of book reviews in SCI-Expanded, SSCI and A&HCI indexed journals from 2006 to 2015. Several results of interest were found. First, the results showed that the annual outputs of book reviews by researchers from Germany, Japan, China, and India increased significantly. Second, the number of book reviews contributed by researchers from Japan, China, and India is much lower than researchers from traditional scientific powers such as USA and Germany. Third, book reviews are published more in areas of social science and arts and humanities than in those of science and technology. Fourth, book reviews are much less cited than publications of other types are.
Book reviews Web of Science Research areas Citation
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We would like to extend our sincere gratitude to the comments of the anonymous reviewers. We also appreciate the help of Dr. Dilin Liu at the University of Alabama, who helped us polish the language of the manuscript.
Barboza, D. (2010). China passes Japan as second-largest economy (p. B1). New York: The New York Times.Google Scholar
Department of Education, & Employment and Workplace Relations. (2008). Review of Australian higher education—Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
East, J. W. (2011). The scholarly book review in the humanities: An academic Cinderella? Journal of Scholarly Publishing,43(1), 52–67.Google Scholar
Liu, W., Hu, G., Tang, L., & Wang, Y. (2015). China’s global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978–2013). Journal of Informetrics,9(3), 555–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spink, A., Robins, D., & Schamber, L. (1998). Use of scholarly book reviews: Implications for electronic publishing and scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,49(4), 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar