, Volume 114, Issue 2, pp 651–657 | Cite as

Under-cited influential work by Eugene Garfield

  • Ronald Rousseau
  • Xiaojun Hu


We show that Eugene Garfield published articles which are neither highly cited nor completely ignored, but had a clear influence on subsequent citation generations. More precisely, we found ten articles that are under-cited influential publications, in the sense given to this expression in our earlier work. By publishing this investigation we hope to contribute to the remembrance of this great pioneer in our field.


Garfield Under-cited influential publications 



This work is supported by a grant of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant No. 71573225). The authors would like to thank Yuning Zhang for her help in data collection.


  1. Boyack, K., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cawkell, A. E., & Garfield, E. (2001). Institute for scientific information. In E. H. Fredriksson (Ed.), A Century of Science Publishing: A Collection of Essays, (pp. 149–160). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  3. Egghe, L., Guns, R., & Rousseau, R. (2011). Thoughts on uncitedness: Nobel laureates and fields medalists as case studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1637–1644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garfield, E. (1963). Science Citation Index. An international interdisciplinary index to the literature of science. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific information.Google Scholar
  6. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation- Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, 178(4060), 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garfield, E. (1980). Excerpta Medica. Abstracting the biomedical literature for the medical specialist. Current Contents, (Issue 28, July 14).Google Scholar
  8. Garfield, E. (1987). New compounds and reactions are as close as your PC with the Index Chemicus and Current Chemical-Reactions personal databases. Current Contents, (Issue 9, March 2).Google Scholar
  9. Garfield, E. (2001). Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924–1996: Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(14), 1197–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garfield, E., Revesz, G. S., Granito, C. E., Dorr, H. A., Calderon, M. M., & Warner, A. (1970). Index chemicus registry system: Pragmatic approach to substructure chemical retrieval. Journal of Chemical Documentation, 10(1), 54–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu, X. J., & Rousseau, R. (2016). Scientific influence is not always visible: The phenomenon of under-cited influential publications. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1079–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu, X. J., & Rousseau, R. (2017a). Nobel Prize Winners 2016: Igniting or sparking foundational publications? Scientometrics, 110(1), 1053–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu, X. J., & Rousseau, R. (2017b). Do under-cited influential sleeping beauties exist? Proceedings of ISSI2017 (to appear).Google Scholar
  14. Hu, X. J., Rousseau, R., & Chen, J. (2011). On the definition of forward and backward citation generations. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moed, H. F., Burger, W. J. M., Frankfort, J. G., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy, 14(3), 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moed, H. F., de Bruin, R. E., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance—database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33(3), 381–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zunde, P. (1971). Structural models of complex information sources. Information Storage and Retrieval, 7(1), 1–18.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultair Onderzoekscentrum ECOOMKU LeuvenLouvainBelgium
  2. 2.Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of Antwerp (UA)AntwerpBelgium
  3. 3.School of MedicineZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations