Scientometrics

, Volume 114, Issue 2, pp 373–387 | Cite as

The effects of gender, age and academic rank on research diversification

  • Giovanni Abramo
  • Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo
  • Flavia Di Costa
Article

Abstract

In this work we analyze the combined effects of gender, age and academic rank on the propensity of individual scholars to diversify their scientific activity. The aspect of research diversification is measured along three main dimensions, namely its extent and intensity and the cognitive relatedness of the fields of diversification. We apply two regression models to the dataset of scientific output of all Italian professors in the sciences over the period 2004–2008. The aim is to understand how personal and organizational traits can influence individual behaviors in terms of research diversification. Among other considerations, our findings urge caution in identifying research diversification as a co-determinant of the gender productivity gap between males and females.

Keywords

Bibliometrics Specialization Relatedness Italy 

References

  1. Abbott, A. D. (2001). Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C.A. (2017). Gender differences in research diversification behavior. In 16th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference(ISSI2017). Wuhan, China, 16–20 October 2017.Google Scholar
  3. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics, 79(3), 517–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2011). Research productivity: Are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones? Scientometrics, 88(3), 915–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2017). Specialization vs diversification in research activities: The extent, intensity and relatedness of field diversification by individual scientists. Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2426-7.Google Scholar
  6. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2016). The combined effects of age and seniority on research performance of full professors. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bayer, A. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1977). Career age and research-professional activities of academic scientists: Tests of alternative nonlinear models and some implication for higher education faculty policies. The Journal of Higher Education, 48(3), 259–282.Google Scholar
  8. Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E., & Hall, D. E. (1978). Research notes: Correlates of faculty publication. Sociology of Education, 51(2), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chakraborty, T., Tammana, V., Ganguly, N., & Mukherjee, A. (2015). Understanding and modeling diverse scientific careers of researchers. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. In P. Maehr & M. W. Steinkmap (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 217–258). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  12. Costas, R., van Leeuwen Thed, N., & Bordons, M. (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at individual level: The effect of age on productivity and impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1564–1581.Google Scholar
  13. D’Angelo, C. A., Giuffrida, C., & Abramo, G. (2011). A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in large-scale bibliometric databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Social Studies of Science, 13(2), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzalez-Brambila, C., & Veloso, F. M. (2007). The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers. Research Policy, 36(7), 1035–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leahey, E. (2006). Gender differences in productivity: Research specialization as a missing link. Gender and Society, 20(6), 754–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1989). Age and research productivity of academic scientists. Research in Higher Education, 30(5), 531–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lissoni, F., Mairesse, J., Montobbio, F., & Pezzoni, M. (2011). Scientific productivity and academic promotion: A study on French and Italian physicists. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(1), 253–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Long, J. S. (1992). Measure of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71(1), 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mauleón, E., & Bordons, M. (2006). Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of Materials Science. Scientometrics, 66(1), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Millar, M. M. (2013). Interdisciplinary research and the early career: The effect of interdisciplinary dissertation research on career placement and publication productivity of doctoral graduates in the sciences. Research Policy, 42(5), 1152–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Over, R. (1982). Does research productivity decline with age? Higher Education, 11(5), 511–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rhoten, D. (2004). Education: Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science, 306(5704), 2046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rhoten, D., & Pfirman, S. (2007). Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences. Research Policy, 36(1), 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schuitema, G., & Sintov, N. D. (2017). Should we quit our jobs? Challenges, barriers and recommendations for interdisciplinary energy research. Energy Policy, 101, 246–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shin, J. C., & Cummings, W. K. (2010). Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: Research preference, collaboration, and time on research. Scientometrics, 85(2), 581–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Turner, L., & Mairesse, J. (2005). Individual productivity differences in public research: How important are non-individual determinants? An econometric study of French physicists’ publications and citations (1986–1997). Working paper. http://www.jourdan.ens.fr/piketty/fichiers/semina/lunch/Turner2005.pdf. Last Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
  28. Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 847–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Abramo
    • 1
  • Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Flavia Di Costa
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratory for Studies in Research Evaluation, Institute for System Analysis and Computer Science (IASI-CNR)National Research Council of ItalyRomeItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’ImpresaUniversità degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly
  3. 3.Research Value s.r.lRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations