Whatever happened to Garfield’s constant?
- 140 Downloads
The ratio of the total number of citations to the total number of cited papers was called “Garfield’s Constant” in some of the earlier works of Eugene Garfield. Later, he himself realized that the ratio is changing over time, but still was confident that behind this ratio some deeper regularity may be found. In the present paper a systematic analysis of this indicator, the Garfield Ratio is attempted. Its application in journal-level analysis is presented.
KeywordsGarfield’s Constant Garfield Ratio Garfield Factor Citation rate Impact factor
- Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2005). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientist, 19(22), 8.Google Scholar
- Garfield, E. (1976). Is the ratio between number of citations and publications cited a true constant? Current Contents, #6, 5–7. Reprinted in: Garfield, E. (1977) Essays of an Information Scientist, 2, 419–425.Google Scholar
- Garfield, E. (1990) Journal Citation Studies. 52. The multifaceted structure of crystallography research. Part 2. A global perspective. Current Contents, #37, 3–11. Reprinted in: Garfield, E. (1990) Essays of an Information Scientist: Journalology, KeyWords Plus, and other essays, Vol 13, pp 337–345.Google Scholar
- Institute for Scientific Information. (1971). Science Citation Index 1970: Guide & Journal Lists (p. 14). Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.Google Scholar
- Institute for Scientific Information. (2001). Science Citation Index 1995–2000: Comparative statistical summary. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.Google Scholar
- Luukonen-Gronow, T., & Suutarinen, P. (1988). Bibliometric analysis of Nordic cancer research: a report on study data. FPR-Publication No. 8. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
- Rushton, J. P., & Endler, N. S. (1979). More to-do about citation counts in British psychology. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 32(March), 107–109.Google Scholar
- Vinkler, P. (2000). Evaluation of the publication activity of research teams by means of scientometric indicators. Current Science, 79(5), 602–612.Google Scholar
- White, M. J. (1979). Scholarly impact of New Zealand psychology (1970–1977). New Zealand Psychologist, 8(1), 67–75.Google Scholar