Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 114, Issue 2, pp 659–667 | Cite as

Whatever happened to Garfield’s constant?

Article
  • 140 Downloads

Abstract

The ratio of the total number of citations to the total number of cited papers was called “Garfield’s Constant” in some of the earlier works of Eugene Garfield. Later, he himself realized that the ratio is changing over time, but still was confident that behind this ratio some deeper regularity may be found. In the present paper a systematic analysis of this indicator, the Garfield Ratio is attempted. Its application in journal-level analysis is presented.

Keywords

Garfield’s Constant Garfield Ratio Garfield Factor Citation rate Impact factor 

References

  1. Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreis, M., & Jokic, M. (2008). An impact of Croatian journals measured by citation analysis from SCI-expanded database in time span 1975–2001. Scientometrics, 75(2), 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bensman, S. J. (2007). Garfield and the impact factor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 93–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2005). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientist, 19(22), 8.Google Scholar
  5. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2010). On Sleeping Beauties, Princes and other tales of citation distributions. Research Evaluation, 19(3), 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garfield, E. (1976). Is the ratio between number of citations and publications cited a true constant? Current Contents, #6, 5–7. Reprinted in: Garfield, E. (1977) Essays of an Information Scientist, 2, 419–425.Google Scholar
  9. Garfield, E. (1990) Journal Citation Studies. 52. The multifaceted structure of crystallography research. Part 2. A global perspective. Current Contents, #37, 3–11. Reprinted in: Garfield, E. (1990) Essays of an Information Scientist: Journalology, KeyWords Plus, and other essays, Vol 13, pp 337–345.Google Scholar
  10. Garfield, E. (1998). Random thoughts on citationology. Its theory and practice. Scientometrics, 43(1), 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., & Barker, K. (2005). Tracing thought through time and space: A selective review of bibliometrics in social work. Social Work in Health Care, 41(3/4), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Institute for Scientific Information. (1971). Science Citation Index 1970: Guide & Journal Lists (p. 14). Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.Google Scholar
  13. Institute for Scientific Information. (2001). Science Citation Index 1995–2000: Comparative statistical summary. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.Google Scholar
  14. Kolasa, W. M. (2012). Specific character of citations in historiography (using the example of Polish history). Scientometrics, 90(3), 905–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luukonen-Gronow, T., & Suutarinen, P. (1988). Bibliometric analysis of Nordic cancer research: a report on study data. FPR-Publication No. 8. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
  16. Rushton, J. P., & Endler, N. S. (1979). More to-do about citation counts in British psychology. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 32(March), 107–109.Google Scholar
  17. van Leeuwen, T. (2012). Discussing some basic critique on Journal Impact Factors: Revision of earlier comments. Scientometrics, 92(2), 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vinkler, P. (2000). Evaluation of the publication activity of research teams by means of scientometric indicators. Current Science, 79(5), 602–612.Google Scholar
  19. Vinkler, P. (2012). The Garfield impact factor, one of the fundamental indicators in scientometrics. Scientometrics, 92(2), 471–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. White, M. J. (1979). Scholarly impact of New Zealand psychology (1970–1977). New Zealand Psychologist, 8(1), 67–75.Google Scholar
  21. White, M. J., & White, K. G. (1977). Citation analysis of psychology journals. American Psychologist, 32(5), 301–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Library and Information CenterBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Stockholm University LibraryStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations