Faculty research following merger: a job stress and social identity theory perspective
With conflicting public pressure for greater access to higher education and budget reductions and with continuing backlash over increasing tuition and skyrocketing student debt, public universities have intensified efforts to improve organizational efficiency, effectiveness, and productivity. One strategic option is merging institutions of higher education to better utilize resources, reap cost savings, and increase scholarly outputs. Mergers and acquisitions more commonly occur in the business domain and analysis specific to the higher education arena is limited to this point. Our research examines the effects of university merger on knowledge production in the form of faculty scholarly productivity. We use results of a continuing study of merger of two state-funded higher education institutions, with quite different organizational cultures and research orientations, to explore merger impacts. Using the extensive prior literature on job stress and associated person–organization fit, as well as social identity theory, we develop a model of predictors of post-merger research time allocation and associated productivity. We find lingering effects of pre-merger institutional affiliation, particularly for the low status university faculty, on post-merger job stress, organizational fit, and resulting research productivity. The results of our study advance practical approaches to mergers in higher education for policy makers and managers of higher education.
KeywordsFaculty research productivity Higher education Public policy Social identity theory
- Allen, S. D., Link, A. N., & Rosenbaum, D. T. (2007). Entrepreneurship and human capital: Evidence of patenting activity from the academic sector. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(6), 937–951.Google Scholar
- Areekkuzhiyil S. (2011). Organizational stress among faculty members of higher education sector. Ipswich, MA: ERIC. Online submission (serial online). (Accessed February 3, 2014).Google Scholar
- Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Cartwright, S., & Schoenberg, R. (2006). Thirty years of mergers and acquisitions research: Recent advances and future opportunities. British Journal of Management. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00475.x.
- Creswell, J. W. (1985). Faculty research performance: Lessons from the sciences and the social sciences. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1985. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., Omay, S., & Frey, D. (2007). Mergers and group status: The impact of high, low and equal group status on identification and satisfaction with a company merger, experienced controllability, group identity and group cohesion. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17(3), 203–217. doi: 10.1002/casp.874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hardré, P. L., Beesley, A. D., Miller, R. L., & Pace, T. M. (2011). Faculty motivation to do research: Across disciplines in research-extensive universities. Journal of the Professoriate, 5(1), 35–69.Google Scholar
- Higher Education Funding Commission. (2012). Report to Governor deal. Atlanta: University System of Georgia. Accessed June 11, 2013 at www.gov.georgia.gov/sites/gov.georgia.gov/files/related_files/press_release/Recommendations%20of%20the%20Higher%20Education%20Funding%20Commission.pdf.
- Ito, J. K., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2007). Predicting individual research productivity: More than a question of time. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 37(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
- Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., & Snoek, J. D. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Manfreda, K. L., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., & Vehovar, V. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 79.Google Scholar
- Mao, Y. Q., Du, Y., & Liu, J. J. (2009). The effects of university mergers in China since 1990s: From the perspective of knowledge production. International Journal of Educational Management, 23(1), 19–33.Google Scholar
- Middaugh, M. F. (2000). Understanding faculty productivity: Standards and benchmarks for colleges and universities. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Moeller, C., & Chung-Yan, G. A. (2013). Effects of social support on professors’ work stress. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(3), 188–202.Google Scholar
- Skolnik, M. (2000). Does counting publications provide any useful information about academic performance? Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(2), 15–25.Google Scholar
- State Higher Education Executive Officers. (2013). State higher education finance FY 2012. Atlanta: University System of Georgia. Accessed June 11, 2013 at www.sheeo.org/sites/default/files/publications/SHEF%20FY%2012-20130322rev.pdf.
- University System of Georgia (USG). (2012).Eight USG institutions recommended for consolidation. Atlanta: University System of Georgia. http://www.usg.edu/news/release/eight_usg_institutions_recommended_forconsolidation.
- Webber, K. L. (2011). Factors related to faculty research productivity and implications for academic planners. Planning for Higher Education, 39(4), 32–43.Google Scholar
- Zumeta, W., & Raveling, J. S. (2002). Attracting the best and the brightest. Issues in Science and Technology, 19(2), 36–40.Google Scholar