Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research metrics: What about weighted citations?

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Badar, K., Hite, J. M., & Ashraf, N. (2015). Knowledge network centrality, formal rank and research performance: Evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. Scientrometrics, 105(3), 1553–1576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blagus, R., Leskosek, B. L., & Stare, J. (2015). Comparison of bibliometric measures for assessing relative importance of researchers. Scientrometrics, 105(3), 1743–1762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennas, G., Biggio, B., & Di Guardo, M. C. (2015). Data-driven journal meta-ranking in business and management. Scientrometrics, 105(3), 1911–1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geraci, L., Balsis, S., & Busch, A. J. (2015). Gender and the h index in psychology. Scientrometrics, 105(3), 2023–2034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorraiz, J., & Gumpenberger, C. (2015). A flexible bibliometric approach for the assessment of professorial appointments. Scientrometrics, 105(3), 1699–1719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of National Academy Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: However ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuret, T. (2015). Interfield comparison of academic output by using department level data. Scientometrics, 105, 1653–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute and Policlinic for Occupational Medicine, Environmental Medicine and Prevention Research, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    Thomas C. Erren & J. Valérie Groß

Authors
  1. Thomas C. Erren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Valérie Groß
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas C. Erren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erren, T.C., Groß, J.V. Research metrics: What about weighted citations?. Scientometrics 107, 315–316 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1841-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1841-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation