Using the comprehensive patent citation network (CPC) to evaluate patent value
- 998 Downloads
Most approaches to patent citation network analysis are based on single-patent direct citation relation, which is an incomplete understanding of the nature of knowledge flow between patent pairs, which are incapable of objectively evaluating patent value. In this paper, four types of patent citation networks (direct citation, indirect citation, coupling and co-citation networks) are combined, filtered and recomposed based on relational algebra. Then, a method based on comprehensive patent citation (CPC) network for patent value evaluation is proposed, and empirical study of optical disk technology related patents has been conducted based on this method. The empirical study was carried out in two steps: observation of network characteristics over the entire process (citation time lag and topological and graphics characteristics), and measurement verification by independent proxies of patent value (patent family and patent duration). Our results show that the CPC network retains the advantages of patent direct citation, and performs better on topological structure, graphics features, centrality distribution, citation lag and sensitivity than a direct citation network; The verified results by the patent family and maintenance show that the proposed method covers more valuable patents than the traditional method.
KeywordsComprehensive patent citation (CPC) Multiple relationships Patent value evaluation Relational algebra algorithm
We are indebted to Mao Jin for helpful discussions and several constructive proposals. This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundations of China (NSFC Grant Nos. 71273196; 71403256 and 71303023), and this research was also supported by National Key Technology R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2013BAH21B00).
- Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
- Dernis, H., & Khan, M. (2004). Triadic patent families methodology. In: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. Google Scholar
- Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.Google Scholar
- Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools (No. w8498). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38.Google Scholar
- Huang, M., Chen, D., & Dong, H. (2011). Identify technology main paths by adding missing citations using bibliographic coupling and co-citation methods in photovoltaics. Paper presented at the Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET), 2011 Proceedings of PICMET’11.Google Scholar
- Liu, X., Yu, S., Janssens, F., Glänzel, W., Moreau, Y., & De Moor, B. (2010). Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and bibliometrics on a large-scale journal database. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(6), 1105–1119.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2009). OECD Patent Statistics Manual. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
- Pitkethly, R. (1997). The valuation of patents: A review of patent valuation methods with consideration of option based methods and the potential for further research. Paper presented at the Judge Institute Working Paper, http://users.ox.ac.uk/~mast0140/EJWP0599.
- Sampat, B. (2011, 2011-08-30). USPTO patent and citation data, 2013, from http://thedata.harvard.edu/dvn/dv/boffindata/faces/study/StudyPage.xhtml?globalId=hdl:1902.1/16412.
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles (Vol. 1). London UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- USPTO. (2013). U.S. patent grant maintenance fee events file 2013/08/06, from http://www.google.com/googlebooks/uspto-patents-maintenance-fees.html.
- Vinkler, P. (1998). Comparative investigation of frequency and strength of motives toward referencing. The reference threshold model. Scientometrics, 43(1), 107–127.Google Scholar
- Walker, R. D. (1995). Patents as scientific and technical literature. Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
- Webb, C., Dernis, H., Harhoff, D., & Hoisl, K. (2005). Analysing European and International Patent Citations. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers.Google Scholar
- Xiaofan, W., Xiang, L., & Guanrong, C. (2012). Network Science: An Introduction. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
- Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1313–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar