Skip to main content
Log in

Independent simultaneous discoveries visualized through network analysis: the case of linear canonical transforms

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe the structural dynamics of two groups of scientists in relation to the independent simultaneous discovery (i.e., definition and application) of linear canonical transforms. This mathematical construct was built as the transfer kernel of paraxial optical systems by Prof. Stuart A. Collins, working in the ElectroScience Laboratory in Ohio State University. At roughly the same time, it was established as the integral kernel that represents the preservation of uncertainty in quantum mechanics by Prof. Marcos Moshinsky and his postdoctoral associate, Dr. Christiane Quesne, at the Instituto de Física of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. We are interested in the birth and parallel development of the two follower groups that have formed around the two seminal articles, which for more than two decades did not know and acknowledge each other. Each group had different motivations, purposes and applications, and worked in distinct professional environments. As we will show, Moshinsky–Quesne had been highly cited by his associates and students in Mexico and Europe when the importance of his work started to permeate various other mostly theoretical fields; Collins’ paper took more time to be referenced, but later originated a vast following notably among Chinese applied optical scientists. Through social network analysis we visualize the structure and development of these two major coauthoring groups, whose community dynamics shows two distinct patterns of communication that illustrate the disparity in the diffusion of theoretical and technological research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bargmann, V. (1970). Group representations in Hilbert spaces of analytic functions. In P. Gilbert & R. G. Newton (Eds.), Analytical methods in mathematical physics (pp. 27–63). New York: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, M., Heymann, S. & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In International AAAI conference on weblogs and social media. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.

  • Bavelas, A. (1948). A mathematical model for group structures. Human Organization, 7, 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, A. (1968). Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. In D. Cartwright & A. F. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, V. D., Guillaume J., Lambiotte R., & Lefebvre E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10, 1–12.

  • Brannigan, A., & Wanner, R. A. (1983). Multiple discoveries in science: A test of the communication theory. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 8, 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, W. (1964). Matrix methods in optical instrument design. New York: Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. A. (1970). Lens-system diffraction integral written in terms of matrix optics. Journal of Optical Society of America, 60, 1168–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver, BC: Empirical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: Macmillan & Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard, A., & Burch, B. (1975). Introduction to matrix methods in optics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrom, W. O. (1974). Competition in science. American Sociological Review, 39(1), 1–18.

  • Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y. (2006). Efficient, high-quality force-directed graph drawing. Mathematica Journal, 10(1), 37–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Infeld, L., & Plebañski, J. (1955). On a certain class of unitary transformations. Acta Physica Polononica, 14, 41–75.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Itzykson, C. (1969). Group representation in a continuous basis: An example. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 10, 1109–1114.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE, 9, 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. (1917). The superorganic. American Anthropologist, 19, 163–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, S., & Wolf, K. B. (2013). Scientific communication in the process to coauthorship. In G. J. Feist & M. Gorman (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of science. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1961). Singletons and multiples in scientific discovery. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 105(5), 470–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, J. L. (1953). Who shall survive?. New York: Beacon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshinsky, M., & Quesne, C. (1971). Linear canonical transformations and their unitary representations. Journal of Mathematical Physics. (N. Y.), 12(8), 1772–1780.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moshinsky, M. & Quesne, C. (1974) Oscillator systems. In Proceedings of the 15th solvay conference in physics. Gordon and Breach, New York.

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(23), 8577–8582. doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103.

  • Ogburn, W. F., & Thomas, D. (1922). Are inventions inevitable? A note on social evolution. Political Science Quarterly, 37, 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quesne, C., & Moshinsky, M. (1971). Linear canonical transformations and matrix elements. Journal of Mathematical Physics. (N. Y.), 12(8), 1780–1783.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sci2 Team. (2009). Science of Science (Sci2) Tool: Indiana University and SciTech Strategies, Inc. http://sci2.cns.iu.edu

  • Simonton, D. K. (1978). Independent discovery in science and technology: A closer look at the Poisson distribution. Social Studies of Science, 8, 521–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1979). Multiple discovery and invention: Zeitgeist, genius, or chance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1986). Multiple discovery: Some Monte Carlo simulations and Gedanken experiments. Scientometrics, 9, 269–280.

  • Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7(2), 190–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. G. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8(3), 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavroudis, O. (1972). The optics of rays, wavefronts, and caustics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, J., & Milgram, S. (1969). An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry, 32(4), 425–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, S., Hanning, G., Börner, K., Boyac, K. W., Linnemeier, M., Duhon, R. J., Phillips, P. A., et al. (2010) Science of Science (Sci2) Tool User Manual. http://sci.slis.indiana.edu/registration/docs/Sci2_Tutorial.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2013.

  • Wolf, K. B. (1979). Integral transforms in science and engineering. New York: Plenum Publ. Corp. http://www.fis.unam.mx/~bwolf/

  • Wolf, K. B. (2004). Geometric optics on phase space. Heidelberg: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K. B. (2015). Developments of linear canonical transforms—a historical sketch. In M. Alper Kutay, J. J. Healy, H. M. Ozaktas, & J. T. Sheridan (Eds.), Linear canonical transforms: theory and applications. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work of the first author has been supported by the project DGAPA-PAPIIT Nº IN305013_2014, of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; the work of the second author has been supported by DGAPA-PAPIIT Nº101115. The authors also acknowledge the very useful comments of two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofia Liberman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liberman, S., Wolf, K.B. Independent simultaneous discoveries visualized through network analysis: the case of linear canonical transforms. Scientometrics 104, 715–735 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1602-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1602-x

Keywords

Mathematical Subject Classification

Navigation