Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 101, Issue 2, pp 1445–1459 | Cite as

Assessing obliteration by incorporation in a full-text database: JSTOR, Economics, and the concept of “bounded rationality”

  • Katherine W. McCain
Article

Abstract

To evaluate the usefulness of a full-text database as a source for assessing obliteration by incorporation (OBI), 3,707 article records including the catchphrases “bounded rationality” and/or “boundedly rational” (connected with the work of H. A. Simon) in the article text were retrieved from JSTOR, a full-text database with broad disciplinary coverage. Two subsets were analyzed—a 10 % systematic sample of all records and a set of all articles in Economics journals (with the addition of the Journal of Economic Theory). A majority of articles in the 10 % sample came from Economics and Management journals, while Psychology was poorly represented. In the 10 % sample, based on the percentage of true implicit citations between 1992 and 2009 in the 80 % of records that had a catchphrase in the body of the article, rather than just in the reference list, annual OBI ranged from 0 to 70 % (mean 33 %) with no discernible trend. The Economics articles showed a narrower range of OBI—fluctuating around 40 % implicit citations over the same time period. In both data sets, a large proportion of indirect citations were to sources that themselves cited a relevant work by Simon. Over 90 % of the articles in both the 10 % sample and the economics journal set would not have been retrieved with a database record search because they lacked the catchphrase in the record fields.

Keywords

Obliteration by incorporation Economics Full-text databases Citation-in-context analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Some results from this study were presented at Metrics 2012: Workshop on Informetric and Scientometric Research (SIG MET) at the 2012 ASIST Annual Meeting in Baltimore, MD and at ISSI 2013 in Vienna, Austria. I thank the workshop and conference participants for helpful comments and suggestions. I thank Dr. Roger A. McCain, Professor, School of Economics, Drexel University for providing insights into the role of game theory and Simon’s notions of bounded rationality in Economics. I remain responsible for errors and omissions.

References

  1. Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509–512.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burrell, Q. L. (2012). Alternative thoughts on uncitedness. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 1466–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2010). Is scientific literature subject to a “sell-by-date?” A general methodology to analyze the “durability” of scientific documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 329–339.Google Scholar
  4. de Solla Price, D. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 27, 292–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garfield, E. (1977). Introducing Citation Classics: The human side of scientific reports. Essays of an Information Scientist, 3, 1–2.Google Scholar
  6. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanites. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Harwood, N. (2008). Publication outlets and their effect on academic writers’ citations. Scientometrics, 77, 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harwood, N. (2009). An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 497–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heck, J. L., Zaleski, P. A., & Dressler, S. J. (2009). Leading institutional contributors to the elite economic journals. Applied Economics, 41, 2191–2196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40, 342–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McCain, K. W. (2011). Eponymy and obliteration by incorporation: The case of the “Nash Equilibrium”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 1412–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCain, K. W. (2012). Assessing obliteration by incorporation: Issues and caveats. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 2129–2139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCain, K. W. (2013). Assessing obliteration by incorporation in a full-text database: JSTOR and the concept of bounded rationality. In Proceedings of ISSI 2013 Vienna, 14th International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 15–20 July 2013, Vienna, Austria, (pp. 185–199).Google Scholar
  14. McCain, K. W. (2014). Obliteration by incorporation. In B. Cronin & C. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond bibliometrics: Metrics-based evaluation of research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Merton, R. K. (1965). On the shoulders of giants: A Shandean perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Merton, R. K. (1979). Forward. In E. Garfield (Ed.), Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science. 2. Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79, 606–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Messeri, P. (1978). Obliteration by incorporation: Toward a problematics, theory and metric of the use of scientific literature. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting for the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, California, September 5.Google Scholar
  20. Rousseau, R. (1987). The Gozinto theorem: Using citations to determine influences on a scientific publication. Scientometrics, 11, 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley.MATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Small, H. G. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stigler, G. J., Stigler, S. M., & Friedland, C. (1995). The journals of economics. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 331–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thomas, K. S. (1992). The development of eponymy: A case study of the Southern blot. Scientometrics, 24, 405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59, 467–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang, P., & White, M. D. (1999). A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study II. Decisions at the reading and citing stages. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. White, M. D., & Wang, P. (1997). A qualitative study of citing behavior: Contributions, criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns. Library Quarterly, 67, 122–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zuckerman, H. A. (1987). Citation analysis and the complex system of intellectual influence. Scientometrics, 12, 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Computing & InformaticsDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations