, Volume 99, Issue 2, pp 599–613 | Cite as

Exploring scientific articles contributed by industries in Taiwan

  • Yu-Wei Chang


The scientific knowledge contributed by industries remains ambiguous because prior studies have evaluated only specific industries, large companies, or industries collaborating with universities. We conducted a bibliometric analysis of data in the Web of Science database to explore the research partners of industries and determine which industries generate scientific articles, observing industrial trends in Taiwan from 1982 to 2011. The results showed that articles were published related to 26 industries, and the electronic components industry generated the highest percentage of articles (42.4 %), followed by the computer, electronics, and optical product industry (12.3 %). High-tech industries dominated, generating 84.5 % of the articles and demonstrating an annual increase in publications. In addition, industry researchers tended to cooperate with researchers affiliated with domestic institutions, particularly universities. Those in high-tech industries produced a higher percentage of articles coauthored with universities compared with those in low-tech industries.


Industries Corporate research Scientific collaboration 



This paper was supported by a grant from the National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC 101-2410-H-030-079). In addition, we thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.


  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2010). Assessing public-private research collaboration: Is it possible to compare university performance? Scientometrics, 84(1), 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2012). A bibliometric tool to assess the regional dimension of university-industry research collaborations. Scientometrics, 91(3), 955–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altvater-Mackensen, N., Bakucju, G., Bestakowa, L., Bocatius, B., Braun, J., Brehmer, L., et al. (2005). Science and technology in the region: The output of regional science and technology. Scientometrics, 63(3), 463–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arza, V., & Vazquez, C. (2010). Interactions between public research organizations and industry in Argentina. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banal-Estañol, A., Macho-Stadler, I., & Pérez-Castrillo, D. (2013). Research output from university–industry collaborative projects. Economic Development Quarterly, 27, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayona, C., Garcia-Marco, T., & Huerta, E. (2001). Firms’ motivations for cooperative R&D: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy, 30, 1289–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bekkers, R., & Freitas, I. M. B. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837–1853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belkhodja, O., & Landry, R. (2007). The triple-helix collaboration: Why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors that influence the perceived barriers? Scientometrics, 70(2), 301–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calvert, J., & Patel, P. (2003). University-industry research collaborations in the UK: Bibliometric trends. Science and Public Policy, 30(2), 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choung, J. Y., Min, H. G., & Park, M. C. (2003). Patterns of knowledge production: The case of information and telecommunication sector in Korea. Scientometrics, 58(1), 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Council for Economic Planning and Development (2012). Taiwan Statistical Data Book 2012. Retrieved from
  12. Frederiksen, L. F. (2004). Disciplinary determinants of bibliometric impact in Danish industrial research: Collaboration and visibility. Scientometrics, 61(2), 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furukawa, R., & Goto, A. (2006). Core scientists and innovations in Japanese electronics companies. Scientometrics, 68(2), 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gambardella, A. (1992). Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s. Research Policy, 21, 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gao, J. P., Ding, K., Teng, L., & Pang, J. (2012). Hybrid documents co-citation analysis: Making sense of the interaction between science and technology in technology diffusion. Scientometrics, 93(2), 459–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Godin, B. (1996). Research and the practice of publication in industries. Research Policy, 25, 587–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halperin, M. R., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1987). Firm and industry characteristics influencing publications of scientists in large American companies. R&D Management, 17, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hecker, D. (1999). High-technology employment: A broader view. Monthly Labor Review, 122(6), 18–28.Google Scholar
  19. Hicks, D. (1993). University-industry research links in Japan. Policy Sciences, 26(4), 361–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hicks, D. (1995). Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4(2), 401–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hicks, D. M., Isard, P. A., & Martin, B. R. (1996). A morphology of Japanese and European corporate research networks. Research Policy, 25(3), 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kinney, A. J., Krebbers, E., & Vollmer, S. J. (2004). Publications from industry. Personal and corporate incentives. Plant Physiology, 134, 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1995). On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24(2), 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liang, L., Chen, L., Wu, Y., & Yuan, J. (2012). The role of Chinese universities in enterprise-university research collaboration. Scientometrics, 90(1), 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lundberg, J., Tomson, G., Lundkvist, I., Skar, J., & Brommels, M. (2006). Collaboration uncovered: Exploring the adequacy of measuring university–industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding. Scientometrics, 69(3), 575–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malecki, E. J. (1985). Industrial location and corporate organization in high technology industries. Economic Geography, 61(4), 345–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mansfield, E. (1980). Basic research and productivity increase in manufacturing. The American Economic Review, 70(5), 863–873.Google Scholar
  28. Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1), 55–65.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32, 1481–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. National Science Council (2012). Indicators of science and technology, 2011. Retrieved from
  31. OECD (2012). OECD science, technology and R&D statistics. Retrieved from OECD iLibrary database.Google Scholar
  32. Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Olmeda-Gomez, C., & Ovalle-Perandones, M. A. (2011). R&D collaboration in 50 major Spanish companies. Aslib Proceedings, 63(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ribeiro, L. C., Ruiz, R. M., Bernardes, A. T., & Albuquerque, E. M. (2010). Matrices of science and technology interactions and patterns of structured growth: Implications for development. Scientometrics, 83(1), 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. (1994). American universities and technical alliances in industry. Research Policy, 23(3), 323–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shapiro, M. A. (2012). Receiving information at Korean and Taiwanese universities, industry, and GRIs. Scientometrics, 90(1), 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shin, J. C., Lee, S. J., & Kim, Y. (2012). Knowledge-based innovation and collaboration: A triple-helix approach in Saudi Arabia. Scientometrics, 90(1), 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steenhuis, H. J., & de Bruijn, E. J. (2006). High technology revisited: Definition and position. IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, 2, 1080–1084. Retrieved from
  38. Steil, B., Victor, D. G., & Nelson, R. R. (2002). Introduction and overview. In B. Steil, D. G. Victor, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Technological Innovation and economic performance (pp. 1–22). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2004). Is the commercialization of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge? Global trends in the output of corporate research articles. Research Policy, 33, 709–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tijssen, R. J. W., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2006). Measuring impacts of academic science on industrial research: A citation-based approach. Scientometrics, 66(1), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tijssen, R. J. W., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Korevaar, J. C. (1996). Scientific publication activity of industry in the Netherlands. Research Evaluation, 6(2), 105–119.Google Scholar
  42. Wright, M., Claysse, B., Lockett, A., & Knockaert, M. (2008). Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy, 37, 1205–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Library and Information ScienceNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations