Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of citation contexts between natural sciences and social sciences and humanities

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses the method of citation context analysis to compare differences in citation contexts, including cited concepts and citation functions, between natural sciences (NS) and social sciences and humanities (SSH), based on articles citing Little Science, Big Science (LSBS) published between 1963 and 2010. The findings indicate that NS and SSH researchers frequently cite LSBS as a source that is related to a specific topic and as evidence to support a claim. No significant differences were identified in the distribution of cited concepts included in LSBS, but significant differences were observed in the reasons for citing LSBS between NS and SSH citing articles. However, reverse trends were observed in the percentage of some cited concepts and citation functions between NS and SSH, which implies that subtle differences in citation behavior exist between NS and SSH researchers. In addition, each concept category has a different half-life. Concepts related to characteristics of big science and scientific collaboration have the longest half-lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, M. H. (2006). How can we know what we think until we see what we said? A citation and citation context analysis of Karl Weick’s The Social Psychology of Organizing. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1675–1692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. T. (2010). What have scholars retrieved from Walsh and Ungson (1991)? A citation context analysis. Management Learning, 41(2), 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonzi, S., & Snyder, H. W. (1991). Motivations for citation: A comparison of self citation and citation to others. Scientometrics, 21(2), 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, E., & Kebler, R. W. (1960). Half-life of some scientific and technical literature. American Documentation, 11(1), 18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho-Miñano, M., & Núñez-Nickel, M. (2009). The multilayered nature of reference selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 555–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chubin, D. E., & Moitra, S. D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5, 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. R., & Salamon, R. (1988). Kuhn’s Structure of scientific Revolutions in the psychological journal literature, 1969–1983: A descriptive study. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 9(4), 415–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzens, S. E. (1982). Split citation identity: A case study from economics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(4), 233–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzens, S. E. (1985). Comparing the sciences: Citation context analysis of papers from neuropharmacology and the sociology of science. Social Studies of Science, 15, 127–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, C. O. (1979). The use of citation in literary research: A preliminary classification of citation functions. Library Quarterly, 49(4), 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furner, J. (2003). Little book, big book: Before and after Little Science, Big Science: A review article, part I. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 35(2), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1975). The ‘obliteration phenomenon’ in science and the advantage of being obliterated. Current Contents, 51(52), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1980). Citation measures of the influence of Robert K Merton. Transactions. New York Academy of Sciences, 39(1), 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, G. N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7, 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargens, L. L. (2000). Using the literature: Reference networks, reference contexts, and the social structure of scholarship. American Sociological Review, 65(6), 846–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, N. (2009). An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 497–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, M. H., & Chang, Y. W. (2008). Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1819–1828.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lariviere, V., Archambault, E., Gingras, Y., & Vignola-Gagne, E. (2006). The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 997–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipetz, B. A. (1965). Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through inclusion of citation relationship indicators. American Documentation, 16(2), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M. (1993). Progress in documentation the complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 370–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. W., & Salvucci, L. J. (2006). How influential is Brooks’ law? A longitudinal citation context analysis of Frederick Brooks’ The Mythical Man-Month. Journal of Information Science, 32(3), 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. W., & Turner, K. (1989). Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics. Scientometrics, 17(1/2), 127–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, M. J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5, 86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, C., & Renn, S. P. (1978). Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29(5), 225–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peritz, B. C. (1983). A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields. Scientometrics, 5(5), 303–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, D. M., & Pysek, P. (2008). Fifty years of invasion ecology: The legacy of Charles Elton. Diversity of Distributions, 14(2), 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., & Gupta, S. K. S. (1995). Author judgments about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25, 477–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. G. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8, 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1982). Citation context analysis. In B. J. Dervin & M. J. Voight (Eds.), Progress in communication science (Vol. 3, pp. 287–310). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.

  • Spiegel-Rosing, I. (1977). Science studies: Bibliometric and content analysis. Social Studies of Science, 7, 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D. (2004). Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 89–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. D., & Wang, P. (1997). A qualitative study of citing behavior: Contributions, criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns. The Library Quarterly, 67(2), 122–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC100-2628-H-030-045).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd, Taipei, 10617, Taiwan

    Yu-Wei Chang

Authors
  1. Yu-Wei Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Wei Chang.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 List of NS journals citing LSBS
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, YW. A comparison of citation contexts between natural sciences and social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics 96, 535–553 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0956-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0956-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation