Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The changing dynamics in citation index publication position China in a race with the USA for global leadership

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Along with China’s economic emergence is a controversy over the quality and international visibility of citation index publications. This study uses bibliometric statistics to shed further light on the global landscape of citation index publications with special focus on China and the USA. The analysis explores 31 years of the TRS (Thomson Reuters Scientific) database, spanning the 1980–2010 period. Based on this study, the USA maintains global dominance for both WOK (Web of Knowledge) and WOS (Web of Science) TRS publications. Although China ranks a distant second for WOK, it lags behind five other nations for WOS publications. China’s scientific base needs further restructuring for greater global visibility. Emerging economies such as China, India, Brazil and South Africa are fast rising in the global ranks for WOK/WOS publications. China may already be leading the world in some publication attributes, although it could take several more decades to catch up with the USA in others. Normalizations of the publications with population, PTE (population with tertiary education) and GDP (gross domestic product) put small/low-population countries in the global lead. However, countries such as Canada, Greenland, Iceland and Sweden still rank high for most of these publication attributes. Furthermore, WOS per WOK analysis shows that small and/or economically weak countries place greater emphasis on WOS publications. This is particularly visible for countries in Africa and South America. Despite the addition of a large number of indigenous Chinese journals to the TRS database, prediction analysis suggests that China’s desire to surpass the USA could be delayed for several decades. In the race for the next-generation scientific superpower, however, China not only needs to sustain substantial investments in research and development, but also requires restructuring of its research industry. This is especially critical for data readiness, availability and accessibility to the scientific community, and radical implementations of research recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S., & Phelan, T. (1999). The scientific productivity of nations. Minerva, 37(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, S. G., Waage, J., & Delaney, S. (2010). Science and Innovation for Development. UKCDS. http://www.ukcds.org.uk/publication-Science_and_Innovation_for_Development-172.html

  • De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the Science citation index to cybermetrics. Scarecrow Press, 417. ISBN 0810867133.

  • Fung, I. C. H. (2008). Citation of non-English peer review publications—some Chinese examples. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 5(12). doi:10.1186/1742-7622-5-12.

  • Gorraiz, J., Reimann, R., & Gumpenberger, C. (2011). Key factors and considerations in the assessment of international collaboration: a case study for Austria and six countries. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0638-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • GR&DFF. (2011). 2011 Global R&D Funding Forecast; Globalization Narrows R&D Gap Between Countries. http://www.battelle.org.

  • Guan, J., & Gao, X. (2008). Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 357–379. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1871-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, X. & Gong, Y. (2006). China Bets Big on Big Science. Science, 311, 1548–1549. http://www.sciencemag.org.

  • He, T., & Liu, W. (2009). The internationalization of Chinese scientific journals: Aquantitative comparison of three chemical journals from China, England and Japan. Scientometrics, 80(3), 585–595. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2067-y.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J. (2011). Chinese science ministry increases funding. Nature,. doi:10.1038/news.2011.515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle, W. (1999). The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2010). On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 126–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2009). The decline in the concentration of citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 858–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V., Macaluso, B., Archambault, E., & Gingras, Y. (2011). Which scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications and citations. Research Evaluation, 19(1), 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? BioScience, 55(5), 438–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2012). World shares of publications of the USA, EU-27, and China compared and predicted using the new Web of Science interface versus Scopus. El profesional de la información, 21(1), 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Yue, D. R. (2005). Managing global research and development in China: Patterns of R&D configuration and evolution. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(3), 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., & Zhang, F. (2003). Developing English-language academic journals of China. Scientometrics, 57(1), 119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M., & Zhang, J. (2007). Language trends in nanoscience and technology: The case of Chinese-language publications. Scientometrics, 70(3), 555–564. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0302-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Bueno, M., Gálvez, A., Maqueda, M., & Valdivia, E. (2000). Scientific publication trends and the developing world. American Scientist, 88(6), 526–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVeigh, M. E. (2005). Journal self-citation in the Journal Citation Reports®—Science Edition (2002): A Citation Study from The Thomson Corporation. http://www.thomsonscientific.com/media/presentrep/essayspdf/selfcitationsinjcr.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2007.

  • Moed, H. F. (2002). Measuring China’s research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 53(3), 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O. (2010). Are highly cited papers more international? Scientometrics, 83, 397–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RSR (2011). The Royal Society Report 2011: Knowledge, networks and nations Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. http://royalsociety.org/uploadedFiles/Royal_Society_Content/Influencing_Policy/Reports/2011-03-28-Knowledge-networks-nations.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2012.

  • Suttmeier, R. P., Cao, C., & Denis Fred Simon, D. F. (2006). Priorities and funding: “knowledge innovation” and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Science, 312(58), 58–59. doi:10.1126/science.1122280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TRAR. (2010). Thomson Reuters 2010 Annual Report. http://ar.thomsonreuters.com/files/Annual_Report_2010.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2012.

  • Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007). Strength and weakness of national science systems. A bibliometric analysis through cooperation patterns. Scientometrics, 79(2), 389–408. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0426-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Wang, H., & Weldon, P. R. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of English-language academic journals of China and their internationalization. Scientometrics, 73(3), 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wormell, I. (1998). Informetric analysis of the international impact of scientific journals: How ‘international’ are the international journals? Journal of Documentation, 54(5), 584–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelnio, R. (2011). Identifying the global core-periphery structure of science. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0598-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in Science. Research Policy, 35, 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2007). The citation impacts and citation environments of Chinese journals in mathematics. Scientometrics, 72(2), 185–200. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1713-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the China-Africa Science and Technology Partnership Program (CASTEP). We are thankful for the incredible inputs of the anonymous reviewers and editors by way of insightful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11 Datun Road, Beijing, 100101, China

    Juana Paul Moiwo & Fulu Tao

Authors
  1. Juana Paul Moiwo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fulu Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juana Paul Moiwo.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Online Appendix (DOC 710 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moiwo, J.P., Tao, F. The changing dynamics in citation index publication position China in a race with the USA for global leadership. Scientometrics 95, 1031–1050 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0846-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0846-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation