Physics publication productivity in South African universities
- 358 Downloads
Publication productivity during 2009–2011 was studied for physicists who teach in South African universities, using data from departmental websites and Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science. The objective was to find typical ranges of two measures of individual productivity: number of papers and sum of author share, where author share per n-author paper is 1/n author units (AU). All values given below are average output per year. Median productivity was 1.33 papers (inter-quartile range 0.33–2.33) and 0.3 AU (inter-quartile range 0.1–0.5 AU). The lowest 10 % did not publish, and the top 10 % produced above four papers and above 1 AU. Productivity varied with rank, ranging from medians of 0.67 papers and 0.2 AU for lecturers to 1.67 papers and 0.4 AU for full professors. Productivity of South African professors was similar to that of a sample of USA professors in a comparable mid-ranked bracket in the Shanghai Jiao Tong world ranking of universities, and about half that of professors in the six top-ranked departments in the world, which had medians of four papers and 1 AU.
KeywordsPhysics Publication Productivity South Africa Universities
The author acknowledges useful discussions with Richard Mace, Thomas Konrad, Francesco Petruccione, and Romulus Breban. Thanks also to Steven Katashaya (North West Univ), Joseph Kirui (Univ Venda), Erasmus Rammutla (Univ Limpopo), and Erich Rohwer (Univ Stellenbosch) for verifying or supplying academic staff information. Some of the work was done as a Visiting Scientist at the Pasteur Institute, Paris, France, supported by a Knowledge Interchange and Collaboration travel grant from the NRF (UID 78894), and sabbatical leave from the University of KwaZulu-Natal.
- Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C., Cicero, T. (2012). What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance? Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0714-9. Published online 5 April 2012.
- ARWU. (2011). Academic Ranking of World Universities 2011. Center for World-Class Universities of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Accessed 12 November 2011. http://www.shanghairanking.com.
- CHE. (2009). The state of higher education in South Africa. Higher Education Monitor (8), Oct 2009. Pretoria: Council on Higher Education Advice and Monitoring Directorate. http://www.che.ac.za/documents/d000201/Higher_Education_Monitor_8.pdf.
- CHE. (2010). Universities of Technology: Deepening the debate. Kagisano (7), Feb 2010. Pretoria: Council on Higher education. http://www.che.ac.za/documents/d000205/Kagisano_No_7_February2010.pdf.
- David, P. A. (1994). Positive feedbacks and research productivity in science: Reopening another black box. In O. Granstrand (Ed.), Economics of technology (pp. 65–85). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- DBE. (2010). Education statistics in South Africa 2009, Nov 2010. Dept of Basic Education, Republic of South Africa. Accessed 12 November 2011. http://www.info.gov.za/view/DownloadFileAction?id=137426.
- DHET. (2010). Ministerial statement on university funding: 2011/2012. Ministry of Higher Education and Training, Dec 2010. Accessed 16 July 2012. http://www.dhet.gov.za.
- DOE. (2003). Policy and procedures for measurement of research output of public higher education institutions. Ministry of Education, Oct 2003. Government Gazette 460(25583). Accessed 16 July 2012. http://www.dhet.gov.za.
- Mthembu, T., & Naidoo, P. (2002). National education’s research benchmarks: realistic targets or pie in the sky? Alternation, 9(1), 176–203.Google Scholar
- Nicholson, S., Mulvey, P. J. (2011). Roster of physics departments with enrollment and degree data, 2010. American Institute of Physics Statistical Research Center. http://www.aip.org/statistics.
- Schulze, S. (2008). Academic research at a South African higher education institution: quality issues. South African Journal of Higher Education, 22(3), 629–643.Google Scholar
- Vaughan, C. L. (2008). Alternatives to the publication subsidy for research funding. South African Journal of Science, 104, 91–96.Google Scholar