Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 93, Issue 3, pp 949–966 | Cite as

Visibility in international rankings. Strategies for enhancing the competitiveness of Spanish universities

  • Daniela De Filippo
  • Fernando Casani
  • Carlos García-Zorita
  • Preiddy Efraín-García
  • Elías Sanz-Casado
Article

Abstract

The world-wide popularity of university rankings has spurred the debate about the quality and performance of higher education systems and has had a considerable impact on global society in light of the internationalisation of higher education. While useful for policy makers, such rankings also furnish information on an institution’s “prestige”, which may in turn contribute to more effective resource capture (students, funding, projects). Certain university profiles and missions may prevent many universities from climbing to higher positions, however. One important question in this regard is: how many of a country’s universities can stand at the top of international rankings? The present article attempts to answer this question on the grounds of a study of the Spanish higher education system, and more specifically of an institutional alliance consisting of four high quality universities. A series of research activity indicators drawn from the IUNE Observatory are used to compare this alliance to leading Spanish and international universities and explore whether their visibility and consequently their position in international rankings would be enhanced if they were able to appear under a joint identity. This prospective study also addresses a series of strategies that the Spanish higher education system might implement to successfully rise to the challenges posed by future scenarios.

Keywords

University rankings Spanish universities IUNE observatory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Education’s Study and Analysis Programme under the project “Desarrollo de un observatorio de la actividad investigadora de las universidades en el período 2002–2009, a partir de variables e indicadores de I + D + i” (Development of an observatory on university research, 2002–2009, using R&D + I indicators).

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (2004). The costs and benefits of world-class universities. The race is on to claim higher status and prestige. What gets left behind in the competition for world-class status? Academe online. January–February. http://aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2004/JF/Feat/altb.htm?PF=1.
  2. Buela-Casal, G., Bermúdez, M. P., Sierra, J. C., Quevedo-Blasco, R., & Castro, A. (2010). Ranking de 2009 en investigación de las universidades públicas españolas. Psicothema, 22, 171–179.Google Scholar
  3. CERI. (2006). Four futures scenarios for Higher Education. Meeting of OECD Education Ministers, Athens, 27–28 June.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. New York: Elsevier Science Regional Sales.Google Scholar
  5. Corera, E., Chinchilla, Z., De-Moya, F., & Sanz Menéndez, L. (2010). Producción científica e impacto: Ranking general y por áreas de las instituciones universitarias españolas in Informe CyD 2009 (pp. 254–262). Barcelona: Fundación CyD.Google Scholar
  6. Daraio, C., Bonaccorsi, A., Geuna, A., Lepori, B., Bachd, L., Bogetoft, L., et al. (2011). The European university landscape: A micro characterization based on evidence from the Aquameth project. Research Policy, 40(1), 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Docampo, D. (2008). Rankings internacionales y calidad de los sistemas universitarios. Revista de Educación, número extraordinario, pp. 149–176.Google Scholar
  8. European University Association. (2011). Global university rankings and their impact. Belgium: EUA.Google Scholar
  9. Gómez, I., Bordons, M., Morillo, F., Moreno, L., & González-Albo, B. (2010). La actividad científica del CSIC a través del Web of Science. Estudio bibliométrico del período 2004–2009. Madrid, IEDCYT, CSIC, Diciembre 2010. http://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/32097.
  10. González-Albo, B., Moreno, L., Morillo, F., & Bordons, M. (2011). Bibliometric indicators for the analysis of the research performance of a multidisciplinary institution: the CSIC. Revista española de documentación científica (in press).Google Scholar
  11. Harvey, L. (2008). Rankings on higher education institutions: A critical review. Quality in Higher Education, 14(3), 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kehm, B. M., & Stensaker, B. (Eds.). (2009). University rankings, diversity, and the new landscape of higher education. Global perspectives on higher education (Vol. 18). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Laredo, P. (2007). Quelques réflexions à propos de la caracteérisation des activités des universités. 3èmes Journées scientifiques du LATTS, Cité Descartes/Marne-la-Vallée, 19–20 March.Google Scholar
  14. Pérez-Esparrells, C., & Gómez-Sancho, J. M. (2011). Los rankings internacionales de las instituciones de educación superior y las clasificaciones universitarias en España: visión panorámica y prospectiva de futuro. Serie: Documentos de Trabajo. Fundación de las cajas de ahorrosGoogle Scholar
  15. Philip, G., Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L, & Rumbley, L. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. UNESCO 2009 world conference on higher education.Google Scholar
  16. Pulido, A. (2009). El Futuro De La Universidad. Un tema para debate dentro y fuera de las universidades. Madrid: Delta Publicaciones Universitarias.Google Scholar
  17. Sadlak, J., & Liu, N. C. (2007). The world-class university and ranking: Aiming beyond status. Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.Google Scholar
  18. Saisana, M., d’Hombres, B., & Saltelli, A. (2011). Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications. Research Policy, 40(1), 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Salmi, J. (2010). If ranking is the disease, is benchmarking the cure? Presentation at IREG 2010 conference, Berlin, 7–8 October 2010.Google Scholar
  20. Sanz-Casado, E., De Filippo, D., García-Zorita, C., & Efraín-García, P. (2011). Observatorio IUNE: Una nueva herramienta para el seguimiento de la actividad investigadora del sistema universitario español. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 63(2), 101–115.Google Scholar
  21. Teixeira, P., Cardoso, M. F., Sarrico, C. S., & Rosa, M. J. (2007). The Portuguese public university system: On the road to improvement? In A. Bonaccorsi & C. Daraio (Eds.), Universities and strategic knowledge creation. Specialization and performance in Europe (pp. 347–375). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  22. Torres-Salinas, D., Delgado-López-Cózar, E., García-Moreno-Torres, J., & Herrera, F. (2011). Ranking ISI de las universidades españolas según campos científicos: Descripción y resultados. El profesional de la Información, 20(1), 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van Raan, A. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometrics methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zitt, M., & Filliatreau, G. (2007). Big is (made) beautiful—Some comments about Shanghai-ranking of world-class universities. In J. Sadlak & L. N. Cai (Eds.), The world-class university and ranking: Aiming beyond status. Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela De Filippo
    • 1
  • Fernando Casani
    • 2
  • Carlos García-Zorita
    • 1
  • Preiddy Efraín-García
    • 1
  • Elías Sanz-Casado
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Library and Information ScienceCarlos III University of MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of Business AdministrationAutonomous University of MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations