, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 207–215 | Cite as

Web visibility of scholars in media and communication journals

  • Chung Joo Chung
  • Han Woo Park


This paper examines the Web visibility of researchers in the field of communication. First, we measured the Web visibility of authors who have recently published their research in communication journals contained in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) provided by the Web of Science. Second, we identified a subset of authors based on their publication outlets and summarize those researchers with the highest Web presence. Lastly, we determined the factors affecting their Web visibility by using a set of national and linguistic variables of the individual researchers. Web data were collected by using a advanced search tool based on the API. Web presence is defined as the number of Web (co-) mentions of each researcher. We identified the most solely-visible scholars in the entire communication webosphere and scholars with the most networked visibility based on co-mentions. There is a weak but statistically significant correlation between researchers’ Web visibility and their SSCI publication counts. Further, US-based and/or English-speaking scholars were more noticeable than others on cyberspace.


Web visibility Webometrics Scientometrics Media and communication science 



The corresponding author acknowledges that this work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2010-330-B00232, Social Science Korea Program). Many thanks go to Yeon-ok Lee and research assistants, Ji-Young Park, Ji-Young Kim, Seoung-Cheol Choi, and Ho-Young Yoon.


  1. Aaltojärvi, I., Arminen, I., Auranen, O., & Pasanen, H. (2008). Scientific productivity Web visibility and citation patterns in sixteen nordic sociology departments. Acta Sociologica, 51, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguillo, I. F., Granadino, B., Ortega, J. L., & Prieto, J. A. (2006). Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetrics indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1296–1302.Google Scholar
  3. Barjak, F., Li, X., & Thelwall, M. (2007). Which factors explain the Web impact of scientists’ personal homepages? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 200–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borgmann, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Borgmann, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 2–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caldas, A. (2006). On Web structure and digital knowledge bases: Online and offline connections in science. In C. Hine (Ed.), New infrastructures for knowledge production: Understanding e-Science (pp. 206–232). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Cronin, B. (2001). Bibliometrics and beyond: Some thoughts on Web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 26, 329–335.Google Scholar
  8. Espadas, J., Calero, C., & Piattini, M. (2008). Web site visibility evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1727–1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heimeriks, G., & Vasileiadou, E. (2008). Changes or transition? analysing the use of ICTs in the sciences. Social Science Information, 47, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ingwersen, P. (1998). The calculation of Web impact. Journal of Documentation, 54, 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jasco, P. (2005). Google Scholar: The pros and the cons. Online Information Review, 29, 208–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2007). Google Scholars citations and Google Web/URL citation: A multidiscipline exploratory analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 1055–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kretschmer, H. (2004). Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web. Scientometrics, 60, 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kretschmer, H., Kretschmer, U., & Kretschmer, T. (2007). Reflection of co-authorship networks in the Web: Web hyperlinks versus Web visibility rates. Scientometrics, 70, 519–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawrence, S., & Giles, C. L. (2004). Accessibility of information on the Web. Science, 400, 107–109.Google Scholar
  16. Lee, M., & Park, H. W. (2012). Exploring the Web visibility of world-class universities. Scientometrics, 90, 201–218.Google Scholar
  17. Meyer, E. T., & Schroeder, R. (2009). The World Wide Web of research and access to knowledge. Knowledge Management Research Practice, 7, 218–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Notess, G. R. (2003). Search engine statistics: Relative size showdown. Retrieved from
  19. Park, H. W., & Thelwall, M. (2006). Web science communication in the age of globalization. New Media and Society., 8, 629–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Park, H. W., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Link analysis: Hyperlink patterns and social structure on politicians’ Web sites in South Korea. Quality and Quantity, 42, 687–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sullivan, D. (2006). Nielsen Netrating search engine ratings. Retrieved from Ratings.
  22. Thelwall, M. (2001). Results from a Web impact factor crawler. Journal of Documentation, 57, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thelwall, M. (2011). Introduction to Webometric Analyst: A research tool for social scientists. Retrieved from Scholar
  24. Thelwall, M., & Harries, G. (2004). Do better scholars’ Web publications have significantly higher online impact? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thelwall, M., & Sud, P. (2011). A comparison of methods for collecting Web citation data for academic organisations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 1488–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thelwall, M., Tang, R., & Price, L. (2003). Linguistic patterns of academic Web use in Western Europe. Scientometrics, 56(3), 417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thelwall, M., Li, X., Barjak, F., & Robinson, S. (2008). Assessing the international Web connectivity of research groups. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 60, 18–31.Google Scholar
  28. Vaughan, L., & Shaw, D. (2003). Bibliographic and Web citation: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 1313–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhao, D. (2005). Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science: A comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals. Information Processing Management, 41, 1403–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Journalism & Mass CommunicationKyungpook National UniversityTaeguSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Media and InformationWCU Webometrics Institute, YeungNam UniversityGyeongsanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations