Optimal and hierarchical clustering of large-scale hybrid networks for scientific mapping
Previous studies have shown that hybrid clustering methods based on textual and citation information outperforms clustering methods that use only one of these components. However, former methods focus on the vector space model. In this paper we apply a hybrid clustering method which is based on the graph model to map the Web of Science database in the mirror of the journals covered by the database. Compared with former hybrid clustering strategies, our method is very fast and even achieves better clustering accuracy. In addition, it detects the number of clusters automatically and provides a top-down hierarchical analysis, which fits in with the practical application. We quantitatively and qualitatively asses the added value of such an integrated analysis and we investigate whether the clustering outcome provides an appropriate representation of the field structure by comparing with a text-only or citation-only clustering and with another hybrid method based on linear combination of distance matrices. Our dataset consists of about 8,000 journals published in the period 2002–2006. The cognitive analysis, including the ranked journals, term annotation and the visualization of cluster structure demonstrates the efficiency of our strategy.
KeywordsOptimal and hierarchical clustering Text mining Bibliometric analysis Modularity optimization Network analysis
An extended version of a paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Durban (South Africa), 4–7 July 2011 (Liu et al. 2011). The work was supported by (i) The joint post-doctoral programme by Credit Reference Center and Financial Research Institute, The People’s Bank of China; (ii) National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61105058); (iii) Research Council KUL: ProMeta, GOA Ambiorics, GOA MaNet, Co-EEF/05/006, PFV/10/016 SymBioSys, START 1, Optimization in Engineering (OPTEC), IOF-SCORES4CHEM, several PhD/postdoc and fellow grants; (iv) FWO: G.0302.07 (SVM/Kernel), G.0318.05 (subfunctionalization), G.0553.06 (VitamineD), research communities (ICCoS, ANMMM, MLDM); G.0733.09 (3UTR), G.082409 (EGFR); (v) IWT: PhD Grants, Eureka-Flite+, Silicos; SBO-BioFrame, SBO-MoKa, SBO LeCoPro, SBO Climaqs, SBO POM, TBM-IOTA3, O&O-Dsquare; (vi) IBBT; (vii) Belgian Federal Science Policy Office: IUAP P6/04 (DYSCO, Dynamical systems, control and optimization, 2007–2011); (viii) Flemish Government: Center for R&D Monitoring (ECOOM); (viv) EU-RTD: ERNSI: European Research Network on System Identification; FP7-HEALTH CHeartED; FP7-HD-MPC (INFSO-ICT-223854), COST intelliCIS, FP7-EMBOCON (ICT-248940).
- Baeza-Yates, R. A., & Ribeiro-Neto, B. (1999). Modern information retrieval. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar
- Hatcher, E., & Gospodnetić, O. (2004). Lucene in action. Greenwich, CT: Manning Publications Co.Google Scholar
- Jaccard, P. (1901). Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des alpes et des jura. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 37, 547–579.Google Scholar
- Janssens, F., Tran Quoc, V., Glänzel, W., & De Moor, B. (2006b). Integration of textual content and link information for accurate clustering of science fields. In Proceedings of the I international conference on multidisciplinary information sciences and technologies, InSciT2006 (pp 615–619).Google Scholar
- Joachims, T., Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2001). Composite kernels for hypertext categorisation. In Proceedings of the eighteenth international conference on machine learning, ICML’01 (pp 250–257).Google Scholar
- Liu, X., Glänzel, W., & De Moor, B. (2011). A hierarchical and optimal clustering of WoS journal database by hybrid information. In E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, & J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2011—the 13th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics, Durban, South Africa, pp 485–496.Google Scholar
- Modha, D. S., & Spangler, W. S. (2000). Clustering hypertext with applications to web searching. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM on hypertext and hypermedia (pp 143–152). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Mullins, N., & Snizek, K. W. O. (1988). The structural analysis of a scientific paper. Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology (pp 81–105). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. A., Onnela, J. P., & Mucha, P. J. (2009). Communities in networks. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 56(9), 1082–1097, 1164–1166.Google Scholar
- Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1986). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
- Tang, L., Wang, X., & Liu, H. (2010). Community detection in multi-dimensional networks. Technical Report TR10-006. Tempe, AS: School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
- Wang, Y., & Kitsuregawa, M. (2002). Evaluating contents-link coupled web page clustering for web search results. In Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Information and knowledge management, CIKM ’02 (pp 499–506).Google Scholar