A bibliometric study of earthquake research: 1900–2010
We evaluated earthquake research performance based on a bibliometric analysis of 84,051 documents published in journals and other outlets contained in the Scientific Citation Index (SCI) and Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) bibliographic databases for the period of 1900–2010. We summarized significant publication indicators in earthquake research, evaluated national and institutional research performance, and presented earthquake research development from a supplementary perspective. Research output descriptors suggested a solid development in earthquake research, in terms of increasing scientific production and research collaboration. We identified leading authors, institutions, and nations in earthquake research, and there was an uneven distribution of publications at authorial, institutional, and national levels. The most commonly used keywords appeared in the articles were evolution, California, deformation, model, inversion, seismicity, tectonics, crustal structure, fault, zone, lithosphere, and attenuation.
KeywordsBibliometrics Evaluation Earthquake Research performance
The authors are thankful to Prof. Yuh-Shan Ho (Peking University, China) for his pioneering work in the bibliometric methods that were employed in this study. The authors would like to thank funding support from National High-tech R&D Program of China (2009AA122001; 2011AA120304). Comments from the anonymous referees and the editor are also gratefully appreciated. All errors remain the authors’ own.
- Andres, A. (2009). Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study. Cambridge, UK: Chandos Publishing.Google Scholar
- Garfield, E. (1990). Keywords plus-ISIS breakthrough retrieval method. 1. Expanding your searching power on current-contents on diskette. Current Contents, 32, 5–9.Google Scholar
- Hough, S. (2009). Predicting the unpredictable: The tumultuous science of earthquake prediction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Kostoff, R. N. (2000). The underpublishing of science and technology results. The Scientist, 14, 6.Google Scholar
- Okada, Y., Kasahara, K., Hori, S., Obara, K., Sekiguchi, S., Fujiwara, H., et al. (2004). Recent progress of seismic observation networks in Japan. Earth Planets Space, 56, xv–xxviii.Google Scholar
- Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, 348–349.Google Scholar
- Sheeba, J., & Nithyanandam, K. (2011). Trend in earthquake research: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Action Research and Engineering to Eradicate Poverty, 2, 555–558.Google Scholar
- Thomson Reuter. (2010). Special topic: Earthquake > top 20 authors. Accessed December 1, 2011, from http://www.sciencewatch.com/ana/st/earthquakes2/authors/.
- Wells, D., & Coppersmith, K. (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84, 974–1002.Google Scholar