Knowledge production through collaborative research in sub-Saharan Africa: how much do countries contribute to each other’s knowledge output and citation impact?
- 383 Downloads
This paper examines co-authorship of research articles in Thomson Reuters citation indexes in order to assess knowledge co-production in selected sub-Saharan African countries. Two indicators, namely publications and citations, were analysed to establish the patterns of knowledge co-production and its scientific impact, respectively. The study found that knowledge production through collaborative research among sub-Saharan African countries is minimal and contributes only a small percentage when compared to collaboration between sub-Saharan African countries and their foreign counterparts. Similarly, the scientific impact of international collaboration was higher than that of continental collaboration. Countries belonging to the same geographic region contributed to each other’s knowledge production more frequently than they did to the countries outside their region. It is recommended that, for knowledge co-production in sub-Saharan Africa to improve, various measures such as encouraging student and staff exchange, hosting more regional conferences and encouraging research networks need to be put in place.
KeywordsResearch collaboration Knowledge production Sub-Saharan Africa Citation impact
- Cybermetrics Lab. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). (2010). Ranking of World universities: Top Africa. Accessed July 28, 2010, from http://www.webometrics.info/top100_continent.asp?cont=africa.
- Adams, J., King, C., & Hook, D. (2010). Global research report—Africa. Leeds, UK: Thomson Reuters. Accessed August 01, 2010, from http://researchanalytics.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/globalresearchreport-africa.pdf.
- Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
- Boshoff, N. (2009). South-South research collaboration of countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s1119200901200.
- Collazo-Reyes, F., Luna-Morales, M. E., Russell, J. M., & Perez-Angon, M. A. (2010). Enriching knowledge production patterns of Mexican physics in particles and fields. Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s1119201002291.
- Frenken, K. (2002). The geography of collaborative knowledge production: Entropy techniques and results for the European Union. Paper presented at 42nd European Congress Regional Science Association, Dortmund, Germany, August 27–31, 2002. Accessed July 28, 2010, from http://www-sre.wu-wien.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa02/cd-rom/papers/029.pdf.
- Gerber, R. E. (2005). The need for a shift in the South African educational research epistemological landscape. South African Journal of Higher Education, 19, 1395–1404.Google Scholar
- Gibbons, M., Limoges, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.012.
- Imeda, S. N. (2005). The idea of a South African university and implications for knowledge production. South African Journal of Higher Education, 19, 1405–1418.Google Scholar
- Jacob, M. (2000). ‘Mode 2’ in context: The contract researcher, the university and the knowledge society. In M. Jacob & T. Hellstrom (Eds.), The future of knowledge production in the academy. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Klitkou, A., Patel, P., & Campos, A. (2009). Linkages between technical universities and industry measured by co-authorship and patent data. Accessed March 30, 2010, from http://muteis.infonomics.nl/MEIDE/papers/2009/1235891044_AD.pdf.
- Le Grange, L. (2005). Reflexivity and new modes of knowledge production: The case of the human and social sciences. South African Journal of Higher Education, 19, 1444–1455.Google Scholar
- Lundberg, J. (2006). Bibliometrics as a research assessment tool—impact beyond the impact factor. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet. Accessed July 27, 2010, from http://diss.kib.ki.se/2006/91-7140-965-3/thesis.pdf.
- Moravec, J. W. (2007). A new paradigm of knowledge production in Minnesota Higher Education: A Delphi study. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest Information and Learning Co.Google Scholar
- Onyancha, O. B. (2009). South Africa’s regional and international collaboration: An informetric study of participating countries, 1986–2005. In D. N. Ocholla & D. Jacobs (Eds.), Proceedings of the DLIS 10th Annual Conference, 2009 (pp. 176–198). KwaDlangezwa, South Africa: University of Zululand, Department of Information Studies. Accessed July 31, 2010, from http://www.lis.uzulu.ac.za/research/conferences/10th%20DLIS%20conferenceFeb%202010.pdf.
- Russell, J. M., & Rousseau, R. (n. d.). Bibliometrics and institutional evaluation. Accessed June 26, 2010, from http://www.vub.ac.be/BIBLIO/itp/lecturers/ronald_rousseau/ronald_roussea_stim1_bibliometrics_russell.pdf.
- Skyrme, D. J. (2002). The 3Cs of knowledge sharing: Culture, co-opetition and commitment. Accessed July 20, 2010, from http://www.skyrme.com/updates/u64_f1.htm.
- Wessels, J. S. (2006). The challenges of knowledge production by researchers in public administration: A South African perspective. South African Journal of Higher Education, 19, 1499–1515.Google Scholar