Skip to main content
Log in

Iranian Medical Universities in SCIE: evaluation of address variation

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Applying different institutional addresses in the scientific production of a same university has underestimated the scientific production of Iranian universities and consequently lowered their position in the international academic rankings for a long time. The present study evaluated the scientific production of Iranian medical universities according to their institutional addresses registered in the papers indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). By conducting a descriptive research we retrieved total SCIE indexed of top Iranian medical universities and their respective hospitals and research centers from the beginning of 1986 to the end of 2007. Then different variations of the institutional addresses of each university in the author affiliation of papers were assessed. Finally the universities were ranked according to observing a uniformed format for more registered addresses in SCIE. The findings showed unexpected diversity in the institutional affiliation of each university in their SCIE indexed papers. Although “Tehran University of Medical Sciences” showed the most variation in registering institutional addresses but ranked first according to observing unification for more addresses in the SCIE indexed papers comparing to the other universities. The problem of applying different institutional affiliations in the scientific production of the universities should be valued enough by the whole scientific community. Observing a uniformed format in registering institutional addresses of Iranian medical universities would affect their scientific credibility and international ranks through representing their real scientific productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Chart 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Academic Ranking of World Universities. http://www.arwu.org. Accessed May 15, 2010.

  • Aminpour, F., & Kabiri P. (2007) Research performance in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences: Evaluation of scientific productivity. In Proceedings of 11th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (ISSI), Vol. 1, pp. 820–821, June 25–27, 2007. Madrid, Spain.

  • Aminpour, F., & Kabiri, P. (2009). Science production in Iran: The scenario of Iranian medical journals. Journal of research in Medical Sciences, 14(5), 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aminpour, F., Kabiri, P., & Heydari, M. (2009a). Academic contribution to the scientific productivity: A case study. Journal of research in Medical Sciences, 14(6), 393–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aminpour, F., Kabiri, P., Otroj, Z., & Keshtkar, A. A. (2009b). Webometric analysis of Iranian universities of medical sciences. Scientometrics, 80(1), 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bador, P., & Lafouge, T. (2005). Authors’ affiliations and addresses in published articles. Lack of care penalizes French universities in international rankings. Presse médicale 34(9):633–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D., & Arslan, A. (2006). The data gap. Nature, 444(7115), 26–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farzaneh, Aminpour. (2007). Research performance of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in 1385 (April 2006–March 2007). Journal of research in Medical Sciences, 12(6), 308–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goncalves, R. R., Kieling, C., Bressan, R. A., Mari, J. J., & Rohde, L. A. (2009). The evaluation of scientific productivity in Brazil: An assessment of the mental health field. Scientometrics, 80(2), 529–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillevin, L. (2007). The Shanghai rankings: Improving our universities’ international publication rankings by consistent naming in articles. Presse Medicale, 36(12), 1709–1711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education. www.behdasht.gov.ir. Accessed July 1, 2009.

  • King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, N. C., & Cheng, Y. (2005). Academic ranking of world universities: Methodologies and problems. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, N. C., Cheng, Y., & Liu, L. (2005). Academic ranking of world universities using scientometrics: A comment on the “fatal attraction”. Scientometrics, 64(1), 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malekzadeh, R., Mokri, A., & Azarmina, P. (2001). Medical science and research in Iran. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 4(1), 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moin, M., Mahmoudi, M., & Rezaei, N. (2005). Scientific output of Iran at the threshold of the 21st century. Scientometrics, 62(2), 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey-Rocha, J., Garzon-Garcia, B., & Martin-Sempere, J. (2006). Scientists’ performance and consolidation of research teams in biology and biomedicine at the Spanish Council for Scientific Research. Scientometrics, 69(2), 183–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, C., Wilson, C. S., Donnadieu, S., Gaudy, J. F., & Arreto, C. D. (2009). Analysis of the medical and biological pain research literature in the European Union: A 2006 snapshot. Scientometrics, 80(3), 693–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, J. A. A., van Hooydonk, G., Morales, R. G. T., & Jorge, R. A. (2006). Cuban scientific articles in ISI citation indexes and CubaCiencias databases (1988–2003). Scientometrics, 65(2), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabouri, A. A., & Poursasan, N. (2005). Science production in 2004. Rahyaft, 34, 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Salinas, D., Lopez-Cozar, E. D., & Jimenez-Contreras, E. (2009). Ranking of departments and researchers within a university using two different databases: Web of science versus scopus. Scientometrics, 80(3), 761–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005a). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005b). Reply to the comments of Liu et al. Scientometrics, 64(1), 111–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Web of Science. http://isiwebofknowledge.com/products_tools/multidisciplinary/webofscience. Accessed July 1, 2009.

  • Wen, H. C., Ho, Y. S., Jian, W. S., Li, H. C., & Hsu, Y. H. E. (2007). Scientific production of electronic health record research, 1991–2005. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 86(2), 191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zolfigol, M. A., Shiri, M., & Kiani-Bakhtiari, A. (2007). The importance of how to index the scientific documents. Rahyaft, 39, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by grant number 186030 from deputy for research, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzaneh Aminpour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aminpour, F., Kabiri, P., Boroumand, M.A. et al. Iranian Medical Universities in SCIE: evaluation of address variation. Scientometrics 85, 53–63 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0248-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0248-y

Keywords

Navigation