, Volume 85, Issue 1, pp 53–63 | Cite as

Iranian Medical Universities in SCIE: evaluation of address variation

  • Farzaneh Aminpour
  • Payam Kabiri
  • Mohammad Ali Boroumand
  • Abbas Ali Keshtkar
  • Seyed Shamsoddin Hejazi


Applying different institutional addresses in the scientific production of a same university has underestimated the scientific production of Iranian universities and consequently lowered their position in the international academic rankings for a long time. The present study evaluated the scientific production of Iranian medical universities according to their institutional addresses registered in the papers indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). By conducting a descriptive research we retrieved total SCIE indexed of top Iranian medical universities and their respective hospitals and research centers from the beginning of 1986 to the end of 2007. Then different variations of the institutional addresses of each university in the author affiliation of papers were assessed. Finally the universities were ranked according to observing a uniformed format for more registered addresses in SCIE. The findings showed unexpected diversity in the institutional affiliation of each university in their SCIE indexed papers. Although “Tehran University of Medical Sciences” showed the most variation in registering institutional addresses but ranked first according to observing unification for more addresses in the SCIE indexed papers comparing to the other universities. The problem of applying different institutional affiliations in the scientific production of the universities should be valued enough by the whole scientific community. Observing a uniformed format in registering institutional addresses of Iranian medical universities would affect their scientific credibility and international ranks through representing their real scientific productivity.


Institutional affiliation Author affiliation Scientific productivity Academic rankings Science Citation Index Expanded Iranian Universities 



This study was supported by grant number 186030 from deputy for research, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.


  1. Academic Ranking of World Universities. Accessed May 15, 2010.
  2. Aminpour, F., & Kabiri P. (2007) Research performance in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences: Evaluation of scientific productivity. In Proceedings of 11th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics (ISSI), Vol. 1, pp. 820–821, June 25–27, 2007. Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  3. Aminpour, F., & Kabiri, P. (2009). Science production in Iran: The scenario of Iranian medical journals. Journal of research in Medical Sciences, 14(5), 313–322.Google Scholar
  4. Aminpour, F., Kabiri, P., & Heydari, M. (2009a). Academic contribution to the scientific productivity: A case study. Journal of research in Medical Sciences, 14(6), 393–395.Google Scholar
  5. Aminpour, F., Kabiri, P., Otroj, Z., & Keshtkar, A. A. (2009b). Webometric analysis of Iranian universities of medical sciences. Scientometrics, 80(1), 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bador, P., & Lafouge, T. (2005). Authors’ affiliations and addresses in published articles. Lack of care penalizes French universities in international rankings. Presse médicale 34(9):633–636.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, D., & Arslan, A. (2006). The data gap. Nature, 444(7115), 26–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farzaneh, Aminpour. (2007). Research performance of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in 1385 (April 2006–March 2007). Journal of research in Medical Sciences, 12(6), 308–314.Google Scholar
  9. Goncalves, R. R., Kieling, C., Bressan, R. A., Mari, J. J., & Rohde, L. A. (2009). The evaluation of scientific productivity in Brazil: An assessment of the mental health field. Scientometrics, 80(2), 529–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guillevin, L. (2007). The Shanghai rankings: Improving our universities’ international publication rankings by consistent naming in articles. Presse Medicale, 36(12), 1709–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Accessed July 1, 2009.
  12. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu, N. C., & Cheng, Y. (2005). Academic ranking of world universities: Methodologies and problems. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu, N. C., Cheng, Y., & Liu, L. (2005). Academic ranking of world universities using scientometrics: A comment on the “fatal attraction”. Scientometrics, 64(1), 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malekzadeh, R., Mokri, A., & Azarmina, P. (2001). Medical science and research in Iran. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 4(1), 27–39.Google Scholar
  16. Moin, M., Mahmoudi, M., & Rezaei, N. (2005). Scientific output of Iran at the threshold of the 21st century. Scientometrics, 62(2), 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rey-Rocha, J., Garzon-Garcia, B., & Martin-Sempere, J. (2006). Scientists’ performance and consolidation of research teams in biology and biomedicine at the Spanish Council for Scientific Research. Scientometrics, 69(2), 183–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Robert, C., Wilson, C. S., Donnadieu, S., Gaudy, J. F., & Arreto, C. D. (2009). Analysis of the medical and biological pain research literature in the European Union: A 2006 snapshot. Scientometrics, 80(3), 693–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ruiz, J. A. A., van Hooydonk, G., Morales, R. G. T., & Jorge, R. A. (2006). Cuban scientific articles in ISI citation indexes and CubaCiencias databases (1988–2003). Scientometrics, 65(2), 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sabouri, A. A., & Poursasan, N. (2005). Science production in 2004. Rahyaft, 34, 60–65.Google Scholar
  21. Torres-Salinas, D., Lopez-Cozar, E. D., & Jimenez-Contreras, E. (2009). Ranking of departments and researchers within a university using two different databases: Web of science versus scopus. Scientometrics, 80(3), 761–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005a). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005b). Reply to the comments of Liu et al. Scientometrics, 64(1), 111–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wen, H. C., Ho, Y. S., Jian, W. S., Li, H. C., & Hsu, Y. H. E. (2007). Scientific production of electronic health record research, 1991–2005. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 86(2), 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zolfigol, M. A., Shiri, M., & Kiani-Bakhtiari, A. (2007). The importance of how to index the scientific documents. Rahyaft, 39, 37–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farzaneh Aminpour
    • 1
    • 2
  • Payam Kabiri
    • 3
  • Mohammad Ali Boroumand
    • 4
  • Abbas Ali Keshtkar
    • 5
    • 6
  • Seyed Shamsoddin Hejazi
    • 7
  1. 1.Faculty of Management and Medical Information ScienceIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Scientometry Department, Medical Education Research CenterIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
  3. 3.Biostatistics and Epidemiology Department, Faculty of HealthTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  4. 4.Central LibraryIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
  5. 5.Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, School of MedicineGolestan University of Medical SciencesGorganIran
  6. 6.Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and HepatologyGolestan University of Medical SciencesGorganIran
  7. 7.Qom University of Medical SciencesQomIran

Personalised recommendations