Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 85, Issue 1, pp 155–170 | Cite as

Methods for identifying emerging General Purpose Technologies: a case study of nanotechnologies

  • Laura I. Schultz
  • Frederick L. Joutz
Article

Abstract

Nanotechnology is an emerging field of science with the potential to generate new and enhance existing products and transform the production process. US patent data is used to track the emergence of nanotechnologies since 1978. The nanotechnologies that have undergone the most development are identified using patent citation data and co-citation patterns of patents are examined to define clusters of related nanotechnologies. The potential for economic impact of the emerging nanotechnologies is assessed using a generality index.

Keywords

General purpose nanotechnology Citation analysis Nanotechnologies 

References

  1. Basselcoulard, E., Lelu, A., & Zitt, M. (2007). Mapping nanoscience by citation flows: A preliminary analysis. Scientometrics, 70, 859–880.Google Scholar
  2. Booker, R., & Boysen, E. (2005). Nanotechnology for dummies. New York: For Dummies.Google Scholar
  3. Hall, B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2004). Uncovering GPTS with patent data. NBER Working Papers 10901, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  4. Helpman, E., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998), Diffusion of general purpose technologies. In: E. Helpman (Ed.), General purpose technologies and economic growth (pp. 85–119). MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Huang, Z., Chen, H., Yip, A., Ng, G., Guo, F., Chen, Z., et al. (2003). Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: Country, institution and technology field. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 5, 333–363.Google Scholar
  6. Huang, C., Norton, A., & Rasters, N. (2010). Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: A review of social science studies and search strategies. Journal of Technology Transfer.Google Scholar
  7. Hullman, A. (2007). Measuring and assessing the development of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 70, 739–758.Google Scholar
  8. Hullmann, A., & Meyer, M. (2003). Publications and patents in nanotechnology: An overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics, 58, 507–527.Google Scholar
  9. Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2007). Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents. Scientometrics, 70, 693–713.Google Scholar
  10. Lux Research. (2004). The nanotech report. Google Scholar
  11. Meyer, M. (2007). What do we know about innovation in nanotechnology? Some propositions about an emerging field between hype and bath dependency. Scientometrics, 70, 779–810.Google Scholar
  12. Meyer, M., & Persson, O. (1998). Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics, 42, 195–205.Google Scholar
  13. Mogoutov, A., & Kahane, B. (2007), Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: A scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking. Research Policy, 36, 893–903.Google Scholar
  14. National Science Foundation. (2010). Science and engineering indicators 2010. Two volumes (Vol. 1, NSB 10-01, Vol. 2 NSB 10-01A). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Porter, A., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Schoeneck, D. (2008). Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10, 715–728.Google Scholar
  16. Roco, M., & Bainbridge, W. (Eds). (2001). Societal implication sof nanoscience and nanotechnology. NSET workshop report. Arlington: National Science Foundation. http://www.wtec.org/loyola/nano/NSET.Societal.Implications/.
  17. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences, 24, 265–269.Google Scholar
  18. The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Leading to the Next Industrial Revolution. (2000). White house press release. 21 Jan 2000. http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/New/html/20000121_4.html.
  19. Trajtenberg, M., Jaffe, A., & Henderson, R. (1997). University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5, 19–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Chan, C. K. (2007). Internationalization and evolution of application areas of an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 70, 715–737.Google Scholar
  21. Youtie, J., Iacopetta, M., & Graham, S. (2008). Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: Can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 315–329.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Nanoscale Science and EngineeringUniversity of AlbanyAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations