Intellectual structure of biomedical informatics reflected in scholarly events
- 256 Downloads
The purpose of this paper was to analyze the intellectual structure of biomedical informatics reflected in scholarly events such as conferences, workshops, symposia, and seminars. As analysis variables, ‘call for paper topics’, ‘session titles’ and author keywords from biomedical informatics-related scholarly events, and the MeSH descriptors were combined. As analysis cases, the titles and abstracts of 12,536 papers presented at five medical informatics (MI) and six bioinformatics (BI) global scale scholarly event series during the years 1999–2008 were collected. Then, n-gram terms (MI = 6,958; BI = 5,436) from the paper corpus were extracted and the term co-occurrence network was analyzed. One hundred important topics for each medical informatics and bioinformatics were identified through the hub-authority metric, and their usage contexts were compared with the k-nearest neighbor measure. To research trends, newly popular topics by 2-year period units were observed. In the past 10 years the most important topic in MI has been “decision support”, while in BI “gene expression”. Though the two communities share several methodologies, according to our analysis, they do not use them in the same context. This evidence suggests that MI uses technologies for the improvement of productivity in clinical settings, while BI uses algorithms as its tools for scientific biological discovery. Though MI and BI are arguably separate research fields, their topics are increasingly intertwined, and the gap between the fields blurred, forming a broad informatics—namely biomedical informatics. Using scholarly events as data sources for domain analysis is the closest way to approximate the forefront of biomedical informatics.
KeywordsScholarly event Conference Biomedical informatics Intellectual structure Co-word analysis Social network analysis
This study was supported by the Korean Research Foundation under the Grant KRF-2008-562-D00035 and KRF-2006-511-H00001.
- Andrews, J. E. (2003). An author co-citation analysis of medical informatics. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91(1), 47–56.Google Scholar
- Hasman, A., & Haux, R. (2006). Modeling in biomedical informatics—an exploratory analysis (part 1). Methods of Information in Medicine, 45(6), 638–642.Google Scholar
- He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133–159.Google Scholar
- Lisacek, F., Chichester, C., Kaplan, A., & Agnes, S. (2005). Discovering paradigm shift patterns in biomedical abstracts: Application to neurodegenerative diseases. Paper presented at the first international symposium on semantic mining in biomedicine.Google Scholar
- Luscombe, N. M., Greenbaum, D., & Gerstein, M. (2001). What is bioinformatics? A proposed definition and overview of the field. Methods of Information in Medicine, 40(4), 346–358.Google Scholar
- Mann, G. S., Mimno, D., & McCallum, A. (2006). Bibliometric impact measures leveraging topic analysis. Paper presented at the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries.Google Scholar
- Matsuo, Y., Tomobe, H., Hasida, K., & Ishizuka, M. (2003). Mining social network of conference participants from the web. In Proceedings of the international conference on web intelligence (pp. 190–194).Google Scholar
- McCain, K. W., & Silverstein, S. M. (2007). Tracing persistent highly visible research themes in medical informatics. Paper presented at the 2006 AMIA spring congress. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1860/1594.
- Morris, T. A. (2000). Structural relationships within medical informatics. Paper presented at the AMIA 2000 annual symposium.Google Scholar
- Morris, T. A. (2001). Structural relationships within medical informatics: A classification/indexing co-occurrence analysis. Philadelphia: Drexel University.Google Scholar
- Morris, T. A., & McCain, K. W. (1998). The structure of medical informatics journal literature. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 5(5), 448–466.Google Scholar
- Pickens, J., & MacFarlane, A. (2006). Term context models for information retrieval. Paper presented at the 15th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management.Google Scholar
- Rebholz-Schuhman, D., Cameron, G., Clark, D., van Mulligen, E., Coatrieux, J.-L., Del Hoyo Barbolla, E., et al. (2007). SYMBIOmatics: Synergies in medical informatics and bioinformatics—exploring current scientific literature for emerging topics. BMC Bioinformatics, 8(Suppl 1), S18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stegmann, J., & Grohmann, G. (2005). Transitive text mining for information extraction and hypothesis generation. Retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0509020.
- Swanson, D. (1986a). Fish oil, Raynaud’s syndrome, and undiscovered public knowledge. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 30(1), 7–18.Google Scholar
- Swanson, D. (1988). Migraine and magnesium: Eleven neglected connections. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 31(4), 526–557.Google Scholar
- Synnestvedt, M. B., & Chen, C. (2003). Visualizing AMIA: A medical informatics knowledge domain analysis. Paper presented at the AMIA annual symposium. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1479953&blobtype=pdf.
- Synnestvedt, M. B., Chen, C., & Holmes, J. H. (2005). Visual exploration of landmarks and trends in the medical informatics literature. Paper presented at the 2005 AMIA annual symposium. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1560559.