Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Detecting, identifying and visualizing research groups in co-authorship networks

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper proposes a method for detecting, identifying and visualizing research groups. The data used refer to nine Carlos III University of Madrid departments, while the findings for the Communication Technologies Department illustrate the method. Structural analysis was used to generate co-authorship networks. Research groups were identified on the basis of factorial analysis of the raw data matrix and similarities in the choice of co-authors. The resulting networks distinguished the researchers participating in the intra-departmental network from those not involved and identified the existing research groups. Fields of research were characterized by the Journal of Citation Report subject category assigned to the bibliographic references cited in the papers written by the author-factors. The results, i.e., the graphic displays of the structures of the socio-centric and co-authorship networks and the strategies underlying collaboration among researchers, were later discussed with the members of the departments analyzed. The paper constitutes a starting point for understanding and characterizing networking within research institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balakrishnan, H., & Deo, N. (2006). Discovering communities in complex networks. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Southeast Regional Conference (pp. 280–285). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

  • Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1, 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordons, M., & Zulueta, M. A. (1997) Comparison of research team activity in two biomedical fields. Scientometrics, 40(3), 423–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordons, M., Zulueta, M. A., Cabrero, A., & Barrigón, S. (1995a). Identifying research teams with bibliometric tools. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 83–91). Medford: Learned Information.

  • Bordons, M., Zulueta, M. A., Cabrero, A., & Barrigón, S. (1995b). Research performance at the micro level: analysis of structure and dynamics of pharmacological research teams. Research Evaluation, 5(2), 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calero, C., Buter, R., Cabello, C., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2006). How to identify research groups using publication analysis: An example in the field of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 66(2), 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., & Carr, L. (1999a). Visualizing the evolution of a subject domain: a case study. IEEE visualization (pp. 449–452). San Francisco: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., & Carr, L. (1999b). A semantic-centric approach to information visualization. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Visualisation (pp. 18–23). Londres: IEEE Computer Society.

  • Chen, C., & Paul, R. J. (2001). Visualizing a knowledge domain’s intellectual structure. IEEE Computer, 34(3), 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Paul, R. J., & O’Keefe, B. (2001). Fitting the jigsaw of citation: information visualization in domain analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(4), 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. E. (1991). Size, age and productivity of scientific and technical research groups. Scientometrics, 20(3), 395–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2000). Journal as markers of intellectual space: Journal co-citation analysis of information retrieval area, 1987–1997. Scientometrics, 47(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donetti, L., & Muñoz, M. A. (2004). Detecting network communities: A new systematic and efficient algorithm. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10012, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, J. D. (2002). SVG essentials. Beijing: O’Reilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as quasy-firms: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gálvez, C., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2006). The unification of institutional addresses applying parametrized finite-state graphs (P-FSG). Scientometrics, 69(2), 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gálvez, C., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2007). Standardizing formats of corporate source data. Scientometrics, 70(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroimenko, V., & Chen, C. (2005). Visualizing information using SVG and X3D: XML-based technologies for the XML-based Web. London: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, M. A. (1993). Multiple authors, multiple problems. Bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: a literature review. Library and Information Science Research, 15, 325–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero-Solana, V., & Hassan, Y. (2006). Metodología para el desarrollo de interfaces visuales de recuperación de información: Análisis y comparación. Information Research, 11(3), from http://informationr.net/ir/11-3/paper258.html.

  • Ichise, R., Takeda, H., & Uemaya, K. (2006). Exploration of researchers’ social network for discovering communities. In: New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. New York: Springer-Verlag (Joint JSAI Workshop, 2005).

  • Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(1), 7–15.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S. (1992). Bibliometric assessment of intranational University-University collaboration. Dissertation, University of Sussex, Brighton.

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorship? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M. L., & van de Sompel, H. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing and Management, 41, 1462–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miquel, J. F., Okubo, Y., Narváez, N., & Frigoletto, L. (1989). Les scientifiques sont-ils ouverts à la coopération internationale? La Recherche, 20(206), 116–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monfort, N. (2004). Discovering communities through information structure and dynamics: A review of recent research, Pennsylvania State University (Technical Report, no MS-CIS-04–18).

  • Moreno, J. L. (1953). Who shall survive? Foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy and sociodrama. New York: Beacon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Anegón, F., Jiménez Contreras, E., & Moneda Corrochano, M. (1998). Research fronts in library and information science in Spain. Scientometrics, 42(2), 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., & Muñoz-Fernández, F. J. (2004). A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 61(1), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2004a). Detecting community structure in networks. European Physical Journal B, 38, 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. E. J. (2004b). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U S A, 101(Suppl 1), 5200–5205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1999). Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping. Scientometrics, 46(3), 591–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palla, G., Derényi, I., Farkas, I., & Vicsek, T. (2005). Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature, 435, 814–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radicchi, F., Castellano, C., Cecconi, F., Loreto, V., & Parisi, D. (2004). Defining and identifying communities in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U S A, 101(9), 2658–2663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt, J., & BornHoldt, S. (2004). Detecting fuzzy community structures in complex networks with a potts model. Physical Review Letters, 93(21), 218701-1–218701-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seglen, P. O., & Aksnes, D. W. (2000). Scientific productivity and group size: a bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research. Scientometrics, 49(1), 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & Katz, J. S. (2000). Collaborative approaches to research. Brighton: Science Policy Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1), 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas-Quesada, B., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2007). Visualizing the structure of science. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Tunzelmann, N., Ranga, M., Martin, B. R., & Geuna, A. (2003). The effects of size on research performance: A SPRU review. Brighton: University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuckovic-Dekic, L. (2003). Authoship-coauthorship. Archive of Oncology, 11(3), 211–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1997). Visualization of literatures. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 99–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • W3C. Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) Full 1.2 Specification. [Online]. World Wide Web Consortium, 2005. Retrieved October 6, 2007, from http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG12.

  • Wu, F., & Huberman, B. A. (2004). Finding communities in linear time: A physics approach. European Physical Journal B, 38(2), 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zulueta, M. A., & Bordons, M. (1999). A global approach to the study of teams in multidisciplinary research areas through bibliometric indicators. Research Evaluation, 8(2), 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zulueta, M. A., Cabrero, A., & Bordons, M. (1999). Identificación y estudio de grupos de investigación a través de indicadores bibliométricos. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 23(3), 333–347.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SCImago Research Group. Department of Library and Information Science, Carlos III University of Madrid, C/Madrid, 128, 28903, Getafe, Madrid, Spain

    Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez & Carlos Olmeda-Gómez

  2. Department of Information Science, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    Félix Moya-Anegón

  3. SCImago Research Group, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez, Carlos Olmeda-Gómez & Félix Moya-Anegón

Authors
  1. Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlos Olmeda-Gómez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Félix Moya-Anegón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perianes-Rodríguez, A., Olmeda-Gómez, C. & Moya-Anegón, F. Detecting, identifying and visualizing research groups in co-authorship networks. Scientometrics 82, 307–319 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0040-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0040-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation