University patenting activities and their link to the quantity and quality of scientific publications
Integrating data from three independent data sources––USPTO patenting data, Shanghai Jiao Tong University’s Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) and the Times Higher Education Supplement’s World University Ranking (WUR), we examine the possible link between patenting output and the quantity and quality of scientific publications among 281 leading universities world-wide. We found that patenting by these universities, as measured by patents granted by the USPTO, has grown consistently faster than overall US patenting over 1977–2000, although it has grown more slowly over the last 5 years (2000–2005). Moreover, since the mid-1990s, patenting growth has been faster among universities outside North America than among those within North America. We also found that the patenting output of the universities over 2003–2005 is significantly correlated with the quantity and quality of their scientific publications. However, significant regional variations are found: for universities in North America, both the quantity and quality of scientific publications matter, but for European and Australian/NZ universities, only the quantity of publications matter, while for other universities outside North America and Europe/Australia/NZ, only quality of publications matter. We found similar findings when using EPO patenting data instead of USPTO data. Additionally, for USPTO data only, the degree of internationalization of faculty members is found to reduce patenting performance among North American universities, but to increase that of universities outside North America. Plausible explanations for these empirical observations and implications for future research are discussed.
KeywordsUniversity patenting Publication quantity & quality Technology commercialization
- AUTM. (2005). AUTM Canadian licensing survey: FY2004. Survey summary. http://autm.net/events/File/AUTM%20PUBLICATIONS/FY04AUTMLicSurvSum-Canada.pdf.
- Baldini, N. (2006). The patenting universities: Problems and perils, MRPA Paper No. 853, Munich Personal RePEc Archive. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/853/.
- Bourke, P., Butler, L., & Biglia, B. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of Biolgical Sciences Research in Australia. Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University. http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/respubs/bibliometric/contents.htm.
- Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. Rand Journal of Economics, 36, 16–38.Google Scholar
- Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, citations & innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lach, S., & Schankerman, M. (2003). Incentives and invention in universities. NBER Working Paper Series, Paper No. 9727.Google Scholar
- Landry, R., Amara, N., & Saïhi, M. (2005). Patenting and spin-off creation by Canadian researchers in engineering and life sciences. Paper presenting at bringing science to life workshop, Institute for International Business, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, 29 April–1 May 2005.Google Scholar
- Marginson, S., & Van Der Wende, M. (2007). Globalization and higher education. OECD education working paper no. 8. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Payne, A. A., & Siow, A. (2003). Does Federal research funding increase university research output? Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(1), Article 1.Google Scholar
- Snow, D. (2006). Capturing benefits from tomorrow’s technology in today’s products: The effect of absorptive capacity. Harvard Business School Working Papers, HBS Working Paper Number: 07-009.Google Scholar
- Stephan, P. E., Gurmu, S., Sumell, A. J., & Black, G. (2005). Who’s patenting in the university? Evidence from the survey of doctorate recipients. Forthcoming in Economics of Innovation and New Technology. Retrieved April 3, 2007, from http://www2.gsu.edu/~ecosgg/research/pdf/sgsb_eint.pdf.
- Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. Research Policy, 21(1), 172–187.Google Scholar
- Wong, P. K., Allen, K., et al. (2002). Survey of technology transfer and wealth creation (T2WC) Among APRU member universities: Survey report. Singapore: NUS Entrepreneurship Centre.Google Scholar
- Zucker, L., & Darby, M. (1996). Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(23), 12709–12716.Google Scholar