, 80:167 | Cite as

Scholarly research in LIS open access electronic journals: A bibliometric study

  • Bhaskar Mukherjee


Using 17 fully open access electronic journals published uninterruptedly during 2000–2004 in the field of Library and Information Science the present study investigated the trend of LIS Open Access e-journals’ literature by analysing articles, authors, institutions, countries, subjects, & references. Quantitative content analysis was carried out on the data, data were analysed in order to project literature growth, authorship pattern, gender pattern, cited references pattern and related bibliometric phenomena. The analysis indicates that there were as many as 1636 articles published during 2000–2004 with an average increment of 23.75 articles per year. The authorship pattern indicates that team research has not been very common in LIS OA publishing and male authors were keener than female authors. Authors from academic institutions were paid more interest in OA publishing and most of them were from developed nations. The subject coverage of these OA e-journals was very vast and almost all facets of information and library science were covered in these articles. There were 90.10% of articles of these e-journals contained references and on an average an article contained 24 references. Of these, 38.53% of references were hyperlinked and 87.35% of hyperlinked references were live during investigation. The analysis of data clearly indicates that OA e-journals in LIS are rapidly establishing themselves as a most viable media for scholarly communication.


Scholarly Communication Scholarly Research South African Journal Prolific Author Female Author 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Al-Ghamdi, A., Al-Harbi, M., Beacom, N. A. B., Dedolph, J., Deignan, M., Elftmann, C. & Al. (1998), Authorship in JASIS: A quantitative analysis. Katherine Sharp Review, 6. Retrieved 13 July, 2006, from
  2. Atinmo, M. I., Jimba, S. W. (2002), Gender and authorship pattern in an African librarianship journal, 1991–1997. Library Review, 51(9): 458–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates, M. (1999), A tour of information science through the pages of JASIS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50: 975–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, C. M. (1999), Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50: 929–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckland, M. (1999), The landscape of information science: The American Society for Information Science at 62. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50: 970–975. Retrieved 12 January, 2006, from CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cano, V. (1999), Bibliometric overview of library and information science research in Spain. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50: 675–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter, R. C., Kascus, M. A. (1991), Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 1980–1990: Content, change, and trends. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 12: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cline, G. S. (1982), College and research libraries: Its first forty years. College and Research Libraries, 43: 209–232.Google Scholar
  9. Fjallbrant, N. (1997), Scholarly Communication: Historical Development and New Possibilities. Retrieved 22 July, 2005, from
  10. Fowler, F. J. (1988), Survey Research Methods. Rev. ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, p. 9.Google Scholar
  11. Garvey, W. B., Griffith, B. C. (1971), Scientific communication: Its role in the context of research and creation of knowledge. American Psychologist, 20(1): 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harsanyi, M. A. (1993), Multiple authors, multiple problems — bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: A literature review. Library and Information Science Research, 15(Fall): 325–154.Google Scholar
  13. Hawkins, D. T. (1978), Bibliometrics of the online information retrieval literature. Online Review, 2: 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hawkins, D. T. (2001), Bibliometrics of electronic journals in formation science. Information Research, 7(1). Retrieved 22 April, 2006, from
  15. He, S. Y., Spink, A. (2002), A comparison of foreign authorship distribution in JASIST and the Journal of Documentation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(11): 953–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacso, P. (2001). Electronic shoes for Cobbeler’s children: Treatment of digital journals in library and information science database. Online, 25(4): 46–52.Google Scholar
  17. Jarvelin, K., Vakkari, P. (1990), Content-analysis of research articles in library and information-science. Library and Information Science Research, 12: 395–421.Google Scholar
  18. Jarvelin, K., Vakkari, P. (1993), The evolution of library and information science 1965–1985: A content-analysis of journal articles. Information Processing and Management, 29: 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Joglekar, N., Sen, B. (2000), Evaluation of electronic journals in library and information science. In: I. K. Ravichandra Rao (Ed.), Annual Seminar on Electronic Sources of Information. 1–3 March 2000, Bangalore.Google Scholar
  20. King, D. W., Mcdonald, D. D., Roderer, N. K. (1981), Scientific Journals in the United States: Their Production, Use, and Economics (Hutchinson Ross Publishing, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania).Google Scholar
  21. Koehler, W., Aguilar, P., Finarelli, S., Gaunce, C., Hatchette, S., Heydon, R. & Al. (2000), A bibliometric analysis of select information science print and electronic journals in the 1990s. Information Research, 6(1). Retrieved 12 April, 2006, from
  22. Korytnyk, C. A. (1988), Comparison of the publishing patterns between men and women Ph.D.s in Librarianship. Library Quarterly, 58(1): 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mahapatra, G. (1994), Indian library and information science journals: A bibliometric analysis of the rate of citations and their characteristics. Library Review, 43(3): 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nisonger, T. E. (1999), JASIS and library and information science journal ranking: A review and analysis of the last half century. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50: 1004–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nye, J. S., Keohane, R. O. (1972), Introduction. In: R. O. Keohane, J. S. Nye (Eds), Transnational Relations and World Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Olsgaard, J., Olsgaard, J. (1980), Authorship in five library periodicals. College and Research Libraries, 41: 49–54.Google Scholar
  27. Peek, R. P. (1996), Scholarly publishing, facing the new frontiers. In: R. P. Peek, Gregory B. Newby (Eds), Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic Frontier (pp. 3–15). Cambride, MA, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Persson, O., Astrom, F. (2005), Most cited universities and authors in library & information science 1990–2004. Bibliometric Notes, 7(2), Retrieved 12 January, 2007, from
  29. Ravichandra Rao, I. V. (1983), Quantitative Methods for Library and Information Science (pp. 179–217). New Delhi: Wiley Eastern.Google Scholar
  30. Sahoo, K. C. (2002), Information Use Pattern of Researches in Bio-Sciences: A Bibliometric Study. Ludhiana: Medallion Press.Google Scholar
  31. Saracevic, T., Perk, L. (1973), Ascertaining activities in a subject area through bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24: 120–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schloegl, C., Stock, W. G. (2004), Impact and relevance of LIS journals: A scientometric analysis of international and German-language LIS journals-citation analysis versus reader survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(13): 1155–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sen, S. K., Chatterjee, S. K. (1990), An introduction to researches in bibliometrics, part 1: Background and perspective, IASLIC Bulletin, 35(3): 105–117.Google Scholar
  34. Sengupta, I. N. (1990), Bibliometrics and identification of core periodicals. Herald of Library Science, 29(3–4): 226–247.Google Scholar
  35. Sin, S-C. J. (2004), Are library and information science journals becoming more internationalized? — A longitudinal study of authors’ geographical affiliations in 20 LIS journals from 1981 to 2003. In: A. Grove (Ed.), Proceedings 68th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST), 42, Charlotte, US.Google Scholar
  36. Singh, S. N. (1983), The Use of Social Science Literature in India: A Bibliometrics Study. A thesis submitted to the BHU for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Varanasi: Banaras Hindu University.Google Scholar
  37. Smiraglia R. P., Leazer, G. H. (1995), Reflecting the maturation of a profession: Thirty-five years of library resources and technical services. Library Resources and Technical Services, 38: 27–46.Google Scholar
  38. Stephenson, M. S. (1993), The Canadian library journal, 1981–1991: An analysis. CJILS/RCSIB, 18: 1–18.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. Tenopir, C., King, D. W. (2000), Towards Electronic Journals: Realities For Scientists, Librarians, And Publishers (Special Libraries Assoc., Washington DC,). Retrieved 18 March, 2007, from Google Scholar
  40. Terry, J. L. (1996), Authorship in college & research libraries revisited: Gender, institutional affiliation, collaboration. College and Research Libraries, 58: 377–383.Google Scholar
  41. Voorbij, H. (1999) Searching scientific information on the Internet: A Dutch academic user survey. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 50(7): 598–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. White, H. D., McCain, W. (1989), Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24: 120. Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc.Google Scholar
  43. Zhang, Y. (1998), The impact of Internet based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science: A citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 24: 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Library and Information ScienceBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations