Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 77, Issue 2, pp 309–333 | Cite as

Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity

  • Koen Jonkers
  • Robert Tijssen
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study is to contribute to the debate on the relationship between scientific mobility and international collaboration. This case study deals with leading Chinese researchers in the field of plant molecular life sciences who returned to their home country. A correlation analysis of their mobility history, publication output, and international co-publication data, shows the relationship between scientific output, levels of international collaboration and various individual characteristics of returned researchers. The outcome of the analysis suggests that while host countries may loose human capital when Chinese scientists return home, the so-called “return brain drain”, they may also gain in terms of scientific linkages within this rapidly emerging and globalizing research field.

Keywords

Host Country International Collaboration Comparative International Development Return Migration Brain Drain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bozeman, B., Corley, E. (2004), ’scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and human capital, Research Policy, 33: 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bozeman, B., Dietz, J., Gaughan, M. (2001), Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation, International Journal of Technology Management, 22: 716–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cañibano, C., Otamendi, J., Andujar, I. (2008), Measuring and assessing researcher mobility from CV analysis: The case of the Ramón y Cajal programme in Spain, Research Evaluation, 17(1): 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao, C. (2004), China’s Efforts at Turning “Brain Drain” into “Brain Gain”, EAI Background Briefs, Singapore East Asian Institute, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
  5. Cao, X. (1996), Debating ‘Brain Drain’ in the context of Globalisation, Compare, 26: 269–283Google Scholar
  6. Cassarino, J. P. (2004), Theorising Return Migration: A Revisited Conceptual Approach to Return Migrants, EUI working papers, San Domenico di Fiesole, European University Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Cervantes, M., Guellec, D. (2002), The Brain Drain, Old Myths, New Realities, Paris, Directorate For Science, Technology, And Industry, OECD.Google Scholar
  8. Dietz, J., Bozeman, B. (2005), Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital, Research Policy, 34: 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dietz, J., Chompalov, I., Bozeman, B., O’neil Lane, E., Park, J. (2000), Using curriculum vita to study the career paths of scientists and engineers: an exploratory assessment, Scientometrics, 49: 419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietz, J. S. (2004), Scientists and Engineers in Academic Research Centers An Examination of Career Patterns and Productivity, School of Public Policy, Atlanta, Georgia Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  11. Dustmann, C., Kirchkamp, O. (2003), The optimal migration duration and activity choice after remigration, Journal of Development Economics, 67: 351–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finn, M. (2003), Stay Rates of Foreign Doctorate Recipients From U.S. Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education.Google Scholar
  13. Gaughan, M., Bozeman, B. (2002), Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research center grants with research center funding, Research Evaluation, 11: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaughan, M., Ponomariov, P., Bozeman, B. (2007), Using quasi-experimental design and the curriculum vitae to evaluate impacts of earmarked center funding on faculty productivity, collaboration, and grant activity, 2007 Meetings of ISSI. Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  15. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2004), Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship, In: Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., Smoch, U. (Eds), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Iredale, R., Guo, F. (2001), The Transforming Role of Skilled and Business Returnees: Taiwan, China and Bangladesh, Wollongong, Centre for Asia Pacific Social Transformation Studies (CAPSTRANS), University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
  17. Jin, B. H., Li, L., Rousseau, R. (2004), Long-term influences of interventions in the normal development of science: China and the Cultural Revolution, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55: 544–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jin, B. H., Rousseau, R., Suttmeier, R. P., Cao, C. (2007), The role of ethnic ties in international collaboration: The overseas Chinese phenomenon, In: Tores-Salinas, D., Moed, H. F., (Eds), 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  19. Jonkers, K. (2007), Scientific mobility and the internationalization of the Chinese research system: the role of overseas Chinese scientists, Atlanta Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Conference 2007, Atlanta, US.Google Scholar
  20. Katz, J. S., Martin, B. R. (1997), What is research collaboration?, Research Policy, 26: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King, R. (1986), Return Migration and Regional Economic Problems, Wolfeboro, N.H., Croom Helm, Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. Laudel, G. (2001), Collaboration, creativity and rewards: why and how scientists collaborate, International Journal of Technology Management, 22: 762–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laudel, G. (2003), Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help?, Scientometrics, 57: 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee, S. H., Bozeman, B. (2005), The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity, Social Studies of Science, 35: 673–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li, C. (2004), Bringing China’s Best and Brightest Back Home: Regional Disparities and Political Tensions. China Leadership Monitor, 11Google Scholar
  26. Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R. J. W., Persson, O., Sivertsen, G. (1993), The measurement of international scientific collaboration, Scientometrics, 28: 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mahroum, S. (2000), Highly skilled globetrotters: mapping the international migration of human capital. R&D Management, 30: 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Merton, R. K. (1973), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, US.Google Scholar
  29. Meyer, J.-B. (2001), Network approach versus brain drain, lessons from the diaspora, International Migration, 39: 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moed, H. F., De Bruin, R. E., Van Leeuwen, T. N. (1995), New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications, Scientometrics, 33: 381–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mogerou, P. (2006), The Brain Drain of Ph.D.s from Europe to the United States: What We Know and What We Would Like to Know, EUI Working Papers. San Domenico di Fiesole, EUI.Google Scholar
  32. Pierson, A. S., Cotgreave, P. (2000), Citation figures suggest that the UK brain drain is a genuine problem, Nature, 407.Google Scholar
  33. Saxenian, A. (2002), The Silicon Valley connection: Transnational networks and regional development in Taiwan, China and India, Science Technology & Society, 7: 117–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saxenian, A. (2005), From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China, Studies in Comparative International Development, 40: 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, D., Katz, J. S. (2000), Collaborative approaches to research prepared for HEFCE Fundamental Review of Research Policy and Funding.Google Scholar
  36. Song, H.Z. (1997), From brain drain to reverse brain drain: Three decades of Korean experience, Science Technology & Society, 2: 317–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomson Scientific ISI (2005), Journal Citation Reports, Thomson Scientific ISI.Google Scholar
  38. Thomson Scientific ISI (2007), Publication data sourced from Thomson Scientific ISI’s Science Citation Index online by Author, Thomson Scientific ISI.Google Scholar
  39. van Heeringen, A., Dijkwel, P.A. (1987), The relationships between age, mobility and scientific productivity. Part I. Effect of mobility on productivity, Scientometrics, 11: 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wagner, C. S. (2005), Six case studies of international collaboration in science, Scientometrics, 62: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wagner, C. S., Leydesdorff, L. (2005), Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science, Research Policy, 34: 1608–1618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wells, W. (2007), The returning tide, How China, the Worlds most populous country, is building a competitive research base, Journal of Experimental Medicine, 24: 210–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu, R. (2004), Making an Impact, Nature, 428: 206–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yoshikane, F., Kageura, K. (2004), Comparative analysis of coauthorship networks of different domains: The growth and change of networks, Scientometrics, 60: 433–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang, G. C. (2003), Migration of highly skilled Chinese to Europe: Trends and perspective, International Migration, 41: 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang, G. C., Li, W. J. (2002), International Mobility of China’s resources in Science and Technology and its impact, Chapter 11, In: OECD:International Mobility of the Highly Skilled, OECD, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  47. Zweig, D. (1997), To return or not to return? Politics vs. economics in China’s brain drain, Studies in Comparative International Development, 32: 92–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social and Political ScienceEuropean University InstituteSan Domenico Di FiesoleItaly
  2. 2.CSICInstitute of Public Goods and Policies (SPRI Research Group)MadridSpain
  3. 3.Centre for Science and Technology StudiesLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations