Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop and discuss the theoretical basis of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions. Our novel index, which is related to the h-index, provides a metric which removes the size dependence. We discuss its mathematical properties such as merging rules of two sets of papers and analyze the relations between the underlying rank/citation-frequency law and the h-index. The proposed index should be seen as a complement to the h-index, to compare the scientific production of institutions (universities, laboratories or journals) that could be of disparate sizes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and notes

  1. J. E. Hirsch, An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proc. Nat. Acad. Science, 102 (2005) 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Ball, Index aims for fair ranking of scientists, Nature, 436 (2005) 900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Saad, Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively, Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 117–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Glänzel, On the h-index — A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact, Scientometrics, 67(2) (2006) 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, A Hirsch-type index for journals, Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Egghe, R. Rousseau, An informetric model for the Hirsch-index, Scientometrics, 69(1) (2006) 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. F. Molinari, A. Molinari, A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions, Scientometrics, 75(1) (2008) 163–174, see also J. F. Molinari, A. Molinari, Imechanica post, http://www.imechanica.org/node/1031, posted March 13th 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomson Scientific, ISI Web of Knowledge, http://portal.isiknowledge.com

  9. G. Zipf, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort, Cambridge MA: Addison-Wesley, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. J. Lotka, The frequency distribution of scientific productivity, Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 16 (1926) 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Sutter, M.G. Kocher, Power laws of research output. Evidence for journals of economics, Scientometrics, 51(2) (2001) 405–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Bailon-Moreno, E. Jurado-Alameda, R. R. Ruiz-Banos, J. P. Courtial, Bibliometric laws: Empirical flaws of fit, Scientometrics, 63(2) (2005) 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. H. Zanette, S. C. Manrubia, Role of intermittency in urban development: a model of large-scale city formation, Physical Review Letters, 79(3) (1997) 0031–9007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Furusawa, K. Kaneko, Zipf’s law in gene expression, Physical Review Letters, 90(8) (2003) 088102-1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Francois Molinari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molinari, A., Molinari, JF. Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index. Scientometrics 75, 339–356 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1872-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1872-z

Keywords

Navigation