Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The internal migration of Indian scientists, 1981–2003, from an analysis of surnames

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although many Indian surnames are common across the whole country, some are specifically associated with just one or a few of the 35 states and union territories that comprise India today. For example, Reddy comes from Andhra Pradesh and Das, Ghosh and Roy from West Bengal. We investigated the extent to which researchers with names associated with some of the larger states were writing scientific papers in those states, and in other ones, and to see how these concentrations (relative to the whole of India) had changed since the early 1980s. We found that West Bengalis, for example, were now significantly less concentrated in their home state than formerly, and that their concentrations elsewhere were strongly influenced by the state’s geographical distance from West Bengal and, to a lesser extent, by the correlation between the scientific profile of their host state and their own preferences (which favoured physics and engineering over biology and mathematics). Thus they were strongly represented in nearby Bihar, Assam and Orissa, and much less so in Tamil Nadu and Kerala.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Darwin, G. F. (1875), Marriages between first cousins in England and their effects. Journal of the Statistical Society, 38: 153–184.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shami, S. A., Grant, J. C., Bittles, A. H. (1994), Consanguineous marriage within social/occupational class boundaries in Pakistan. Journal of Biosocial Science, 26(1): 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bittles, A. H., Grant, J. C., Shami, S. A. (1993), Consanguinity as a determinant of reproductive behaviour and mortality in Pakistan. International Journal of Epidemiology, 22(3): 463–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crow, J. F., Mange, A. P. (1965), Measurement of inbreeding from the frequency of marriages between persons of the same surname. Eugenics Quarterly, 12: 199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crow, J. F. (1980), The estimation of inbreeding from isonymy. Human Biology, 52: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Biondi, G., Perrotti, E., Mascie-Taylor, C. G. N., Lasker, G. W. (1990), Inbreeding coefficients from isonymy in the Italian-Geek villages. Annals of Human Biology, 17: 543–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Biondi, G., Lasker, G. W., Raspe, P. D., Mascie-Taylor, C. G. N. (1993), Inbreeding coefficients from the surnames of grandparents of the schoolchildren in Albanian-speaking Italian villages. Journal of Biosocial Science, 25: 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biondi, G., Raspe, P., Mascie-Taylor, C. G. N. (2000), Genetic structure through surnames in Campobasso province, Italy. Journal of Biosocial Science, 32: 459–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi, B. C., Hanley, A. J., Holowaty, E. J., Daley, D. (1993), Use of surname to identify individuals of Chinese ancestry. American Journal of Epidemiology, 138: 723–734.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tjam, E. Y. (2001), How to find Chinese research participants: use of a phonologically-based surname search method. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92(2): 138–142.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quan, H., Ghali, W. A., Dean, S., Norris, C. M., Faris, P. D., Galbraith, P. D., Graham, M. M., Knudtson, M. L. (2003), Validity of using surnames to define Chinese ethnicity (meeting abstract). Journal of General and Internal Medicine, 18(s1): 186.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quan, H., Ghali, W. A., Dean, S., Norris, C. M., Galbraith, P. D., Faris, P. D., Graham, M. M., Knudtson, M. L. (2004). Validity of using surname to define Chinese ethnicity. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 95(4): 314.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coldman, A. J., Braun, T., Gallagher, R. P. (1988), The classification of ethnic status using name information. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 42: 390–395.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Balarajan, R., Bulusu, L., Adelstein, A. M., Shukla, V. (1985), Patterns of mortality among migrants to England and Wales from the Indian sub-continent. BMJ, 289: 1185–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nicoll, A., Bassett, K., Ulijaszek, S. J. (1986), What’s in a name? Accuracy of using surnames and forenames in ascribing Asian ethnic identity in English populations. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 40: 364–368.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harding, S., Dews, H., Simpson, S. L. (1999), The potential to identify South Asians using a computerized algorithm to classify names. Population Trends, 97: 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cummins, C., Winter, H., Cheng, K. K., Maric, R., Silcocks, P., Varghese, C. (1999), An assessment of the Nam Pehchan computer program for the identification of names of south Asian ethnic origin. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 21(4): 401–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Degioanni, A., Darlu, P., Raffoux, C. (2003). Analysis of the French National Registry of unrelated bone marrow donors, using surnames as a tool for improving geographical localization of HLA haplotypes. European Journal of Human Genetics, 11: 794–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lagerberg, D., Magnusson, M., Sendelin, C. (2005), Surname as a marker of ethnicity. A study from child health services shows that immigrant respective Swedish families seem to be isolated in different ways. Lakartidningen, 102(30–31): 2145–2148.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shin, E. H., Yu, E. Y. (1984), Use of surnames in ethnic research: the case of Kims in the Korean-American population. Demography, 21(3): 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Piazza, A., Rendine, S., Zei, G., Moroni, A., Cavelli-Sforza, L. L. (1987), Migration rates of human populations from surname distributions. Nature, 329: 714–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chakraborty, R., Barton, S. A., Ferrell, R. E., Schull, W. J. (1989), Ethnicity determination by names among the Aymara of Chile and Bolivia. Human Biology, 61(2): 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Startseva, E. A., Elchinova, G. I., Mamedova, R. A., Ginter, E. K. (1994). The use of the migration index, the parameter of surname diversity, and the values of entropy and redundancy of surname distribution for description of population-structure. Genetika, 30(7): 978–981.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Degioanni, A., Lisa, A., Zei, G., Darlu, P. (1996), Italian surnames and Italian migration to France 1891–1940. Population (Paris), 51(6): 1153–1180.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lewison, G., Igic, R. (1999), Yugoslav politics, “ethnic cleansing” and co-authorship in science. Scientometrics, 44: 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lauderdale, D. S., Kestenbaum, B. (2000), Asian American ethnic classification by surname. Popuational Research Policy Review, 19(3): 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Biondi, G., Raspe, P., Mascie-Taylor, C. G. N. (2001), Migration through surnames in Campobasso province, Italy. Journal of Biosocial Science, 33: 305–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Webster, B. M. (2004), Bibliometric analysis of presence and impact of ethnic minority researchers on science in the UK. Research Evaluation, 13(1): 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shukla, R. (2005), India Science Report: Science Education, Human Resources and Public Attitude towards Science and Technology. New Delhi, India: National Council of Applied Economic Research. Available at: http://www.insaindia.org/India%20Science%20report-Main.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  30. Arunachalam, S., Singh, U. N. (1992), Access to information and the scientific output of India. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research in India, 51: 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nagpaul, P. S. (1995), Contribution of Indian universities to the mainstream scientific literature: a bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics, 32(1): 11–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jayaraman, K. S. (2002), India’s scientists agonize over fall in publication rate. Nature, 419: 100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Prathap, G. (2004), Indian science slows down: V: The slack in the university sector. Current Science, 87(6): 732–734.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sen, B. K., Lakshmi, V. V. (1992), Indian periodiclas in the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 23(2): 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Basu, A. (1999), Science publication indicators for India: questions of interpretation. Scientometrics, 44(3): 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sinha, S. C., Dhiman, A. K. (2000). Science Citation Index: a failure under Indian scientific environment. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 47(2): 63–66.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jayaraman, K. S. (2007), Indian science is in decline, says prime minister. Nature, 445: 134–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Basu, A., Kumar, B. S. V. (2000), International collaboration in Indian scientific papers. Scientometrics, 48(3): 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CIBER, School of Library, Archive & Information Studies, University College London, London, England

    Grant Lewison

  2. National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, New Delhi, India

    Ramesh Kundra

  3. Evaluametrics Ltd., 50 Marksbury Avenue, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 4JF, England

    Grant Lewison

Authors
  1. Grant Lewison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ramesh Kundra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grant Lewison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewison, G., Kundra, R. The internal migration of Indian scientists, 1981–2003, from an analysis of surnames. Scientometrics 75, 21–35 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1842-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1842-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation