, Volume 73, Issue 3, pp 265–279 | Cite as

Scientometric analysis of geostatistics using multivariate methods

  • Feng Zhou
  • Huai-Cheng Guo
  • Yuh-Shan Ho
  • Chao-Zhong Wu


Multivariate methods were successfully employed in a comprehensive scientometric analysis of geostatistics research, and the publications data for this research came from the Science Citation Index and spanned the period from 1967 to 2005. Hierarchical cluster analysis (CA) was used in publication patterns based on different types of variables. A backward discriminant analysis (DA) with appropriate statistical tests was then conducted to confirm CA results and evaluate the variations of various patterns. For authorship pattern, the 50 most productive authors were classified by CA into 4 groups representing different levels, and DA produced 92.0% correct assignment with high reliability. The discriminant parameters were mean impact factor (MIF), annual citations per publication (ACPP), and the number of publications by the first author, for country/region pattern, CA divided the top 50 most productive countries/regions into 4 groups with 95.9% correct assignments, and the discriminant parameters were MIF, ACCP, and independent publication (IP); for institute pattern, 3 groups were identified from the top 50 most productive institutes with nearly 88.0% correct assignment, and the discriminant parameters were MIF, ACCP, IP, and international collaborative publication; last, for journal pattern, the top 50 most productive journals were classified into 3 groups with nearly 98.0% correct assignment, and its discriminant parameters were total citations, impact factor and ACCP. Moreover, we also analyzed general patterns for publication document type, language, subject category, and publication growth.


Discriminant Analysis Impact Factor Correct Assignment Total Citation Publication Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barabas, N., Goovaerts, P., Adriaens, P. (2001), Geostatistical assessment and validation of uncertainty for three-dimensional dioxin data from sediments in an estuarine river. Environmental Science & Technology, 35: 3294–3301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chiu, W. T., Ho, Y. S. (2005), Bibliometric analysis of homeopathy research during the period of 1991 to 2003. Scientometrics, 63: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Delhomme, J. P. (1979), Spatial variability and uncertainty in groundwater flow parameters: A geostatistical approach. Water Resources Research, 15: 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Enachescu, C., Postelnicu, T. (2003), Patterns in journal citation data revealed by exploratory multivariate analysis. Scientometrics, 56: 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Faba-Perez, C., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., De Moya-Anegon, F. (2003), Data mining in a closed Web environment. Scientometrics, 58: 623–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernandez-Cano, A., Bueno, A. (2002), Multivariate evaluation of Spanish educational research journals. Scientometrics, 55: 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garfield, E. (1970), Citation indexing for studying science. Essays of an Information Scientist, 1: 133–138.Google Scholar
  8. Herzfeld, U. C., Higginson, G. A. (1996), Automated geostatistical seafloor classification — Principles, parameters, feature vectors, and discrimination criteria. Computers & Geosciences, 22: 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson, R. A., Wichern, D. W. (2002), Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 5th edition. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  10. Krieger, N., Chen, J. T., Waterman, P. D., Soobader, M. J., Subramanian, S. V., Carson, R. (2002), Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: Does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? The public health disparities geocoding project. American Journal of Epidemiology, 156: 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krige, D. G. (1952), A statistical analysis of some of the borehole values in the orange free state gold field. Journal of the Chemical and Metallurgical Society of South Africa, 53: 47–64.Google Scholar
  12. Matheron, G. (1963), Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology, 58: 1250–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nwagwu, W. (2006), A bibliometric analysis of productivity patterns of biomedical authors of Nigeria during 1967–2002. Scientometrics, 69: 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Petit, R. J., Pineau, E., Demesure, B., Bacilieri, R., Ducousso, A., Kremer, A. (1994), Field-scale variability of soil Properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58: 1501–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rossi, R. E., Mulla, D. J., Journel, A. G., Franz, E. H. (1992), Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecological Monographs, 62: 277–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sichel, H. S. (1952), New methods in the statistical evaluation of mine sampling data. Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy.Google Scholar
  17. Wackernagel, H. (2003), Multivariate Geostatistics: An Introduction with Applications. Springer, Berlin.MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhou, F., Liu, Y., Guo, H. C. (2006), Application of multivariate statistical methods to the water quality assessment of the watercourses in the Northwestern New Territories, Hong Kong. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, DOI 10.1007/s10661-006-9497-x.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Feng Zhou
    • 1
  • Huai-Cheng Guo
    • 1
    • 3
  • Yuh-Shan Ho
    • 1
  • Chao-Zhong Wu
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Environmental SciencesPeking UniversityBeijingP. R. China
  2. 2.Intelligent Transport System Research CenterWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanP. R. China
  3. 3.College of Environmental SciencesPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations