, Volume 72, Issue 2, pp 345–370 | Cite as

Metric analysis of the information visibility and diffusion about the European Higher Education Area on Spanish University websites

  • María Pinto
  • Dora Sales
  • Anne-Vinciane Doucet
  • Andrés Fernández-Ramos
  • David Guerrero


The purpose of the study proposed in this paper is to evaluate the Spanish public university websites dedicated to the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). To do so, the quality of these resources has been analysed in the light of data provided by a series of indicators grouped in seven criteria, most of which were used to determine what information is made available and in what way. The criteria used in our analysis are: visibility, authority, updatedness, accesibility, correctness and completeness, quality assessment and navigability.

All in all, the results allow us to carry out an overall diagnosis of the situation and also provide us with information about the situation at each university, thus revealing their main strengths, namely authority and navegability, and also their chief shortcomings: updatedness, accessibility and quality assessment. In this way it is possible to detect the best practices in each of the aspects evaluated so that they can serve as an example and guide for universities with greater deficiencies and thus help them to improve their EHEA websites.


Information Visibility European High Education Area Quality Policy Very Good Navigation Button 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, J., Tate, M. A. (1999), Web Wisdom: How to Evaluate and Create Information Quality on the Web, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, S. J., Vidgen, R. T. (2001), An evaluation of cyber-bookshops: The webqual method, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6: 6–25.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, S., Vidgen, R. (2002), An integrative approach to the assessment of e-commerce quality, Journal of Electronic Research, 3(3): 114–127.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, S. (1997), Evaluation Criteria. The Good, The Bad & The Ugly: or, Why It’s a Good Idea to Evaluate Web Sources. [On-line]. Available:
  5. Bernstam, E. V., Shelton, D. M., Walji, M., Meric-Bernstam, F. (2005), Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the World Wide Web: what can our patients actually use? International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74: 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chao, H. (2002), Assessing the quality of academia libraries on the Web: the development and testing of criteria, Library & Information Science Research, 24: 169–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clausen, H. (1999), Evaluation of library web sites: the Danish case, The Electronic Library, 17(2): 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corry, M. D., Frick, T. W., Hansen, L. (1997), User-centered design and usability testing of a Web site: An illustrative case study, Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4): 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. European Commission (2001a), Hacer realidad un espacio europeo del aprendizaje permanente [On-line]. Available:
  10. European Commission (2001b), Plan de Acción eLearning: Concebir la Educación del Futuro. [On-line]. Available:
  11. González, J., Wagenaar, R. (Eds) (2003), Tuning Educational Structures in Europe: Final Report: Phase One. Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao, University of Groningen, Groningen. [On-line]. Available: Google Scholar
  12. Gorski, P. (1999), Toward a Multicultural Approach for Evaluating Educational Web Sites. [On-line]. Available:
  13. Haddow, G. (2003), Focusing on health information: how to assess information quality on the internet, Australian Library Journal, 52(2). [on line]. Available:
  14. Holmes, M. (2002), Web Usability and Navigation: A Beginner’s Guide, Osborne/McGraw-Hill, Berkeley, London.Google Scholar
  15. Jadad, A. R., Gagliardi, A. (1998), Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA, 279(8): 611–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kapoun, J. (1998), Teaching undergrads Web evaluation: A guide for library instruction, C&RL News, 59(1). [On-line]. Available:
  17. Kim, P., Eng, T. R., Deering, M. J., Maxfield, A. (1999), Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review, BMJ, 318(7184): 647–649.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, H. (1996), The multiple dimensions of information quality, Information Systems Management, 13(2): 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miranda González, F.J., Bańegil Palacios, T. M. (2004), Quantitative evaluation of commercial web sites: an empirical study of Spanish firms, International Journal of Information Management, 24: 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olsina, L., Godoy, D., Lafuente, G., Rossi, G. (1999), Quality characteristics and attributes for academic Web sites, Web Engineering Workshop at www8, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  21. Overbeeke, M., Snizek, W. (2005), Web sites and coorporate culture: a research note, Business & Society, 44(3): 346–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pinto, M. (Ed.) (2003), Visibilidad de la investigación de las universidades españolas a través de sus páginas web en el ámbito del Espacio Europeo de Enseñanza Superior: análisis, evaluación y mejora de la calidad. Proyecto EA2003-0012. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Madrid.Google Scholar
  23. Pinto, M., Alonso, J. L., Cordón, J. A., Fernandez, V., Garcia, C., Garcia, J., Gomez, C., Zazo, A. F. (2005), Quality assessment of Spanish universities’s web sites focused on the European Research Area, Scientometrics, 65(1): 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reichert, S., Tauch, C. (2005), Trends in European Higher Education. European Universities Implementing Bologna. European University Association (EUA). [On-line]. Available:
  25. Spool, J. M. (1999), Web Site Usability: A Designer’s Guide, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  26. Sellitto, C., Burgess, S. (2005), Towards a weighted average framework for evaluating the quality of weblocated health information, Journal of Information Science, 31: 260–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, A. G. (1997), Testing the surf: Criteria for evaluating internet information resources, The Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 8(3). [On-line]. Available:
  28. Wang, P, Hawk, W. B., Tenopir, C. (2000), Users’ interaction with World Wide Web resources: An exploratory study using a holistic approach, Information Processing and Management, 36: 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. W3C (1997), The World-Wide Web Virtual Library. [On-line]. Available:
  30. W3C (1999), Checklist of Checkpoints for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. [On-line]. Available:
  31. Zhang, J., Dimitroff, A. (2000), The impact of metadata implementation on webpage visibility in search engine results (Part II), Information Processing and Management, 41: 691–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Pinto
    • 1
  • Dora Sales
    • 2
  • Anne-Vinciane Doucet
    • 1
  • Andrés Fernández-Ramos
    • 1
  • David Guerrero
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Information ScienceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Translation and CommunicationUniversitat Jaume ICastellónSpain
  3. 3.Vice-Rectorate for Planning, Quality and Evaluation of TeachingUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations