Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 73, Issue 1, pp 79–89 | Cite as

Journal self-citation rates in ecological sciences

  • Jochen Krauss
Article

Abstract

Impact factors are a widely accepted means for the assessment of journal quality. However, journal editors have possibilities to influence the impact factor of their journals, for example, by requesting authors to cite additional papers published recently in that journal thus increasing the self-citation rate. I calculated self-citation rates of journals ranked in the Journal Citation Reports of ISI in the subject category “Ecology” (n = 107). On average, self citation was responsible for 16.2 ± 1.3% (mean ± SE) of the impact factor in 2004. The self-citation rates decrease with increasing journal impact, but even high impact journals show large variation. Six journals suspected to request for additional citations showed high self-citation rates, which increased over the last seven years. To avoid further deliberate increases in self-citation rates, I suggest to take journal-specific self-citation rates into account for journal rankings.

Keywords

Impact Factor Citation Rate Journal Citation Report Journal Impact Factor Immediacy Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam, D. (2002), The counting house. Nature, 415: 726–729.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A. A. (2005), Corruption of journal impact factors. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20: 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ANON (2001), Statgraphics Plus for Windows, ver. 5.1. Manugistics, Rockville, MD, USA.Google Scholar
  4. ANON (2004), R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. (URL http://www.R-project.org/)
  5. Baylis, M., Gravenor, M., Kao, R. (1999), Sprucing up one’s impact factor. Nature, 401: 321–322.Google Scholar
  6. Campanario, J. M., Gonzalez, L. (2006), Journal self-citations that contribute to the impact factor: documents labeled “editorial material” in journals covered by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 69: 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Editor’s Note (2005), Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20: 157.Google Scholar
  8. Garfield, E. (1999), Journal impact factor: A brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161: 979–980.Google Scholar
  9. Hemmingsson, A., Edgren, J., Mygind, T., Skjennald, A. (2002b), Impact factors in scientific journals. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 15: 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hemmingsson, A., Mygind, T., Skjennald, A., Edgren, J. (2002a), Manipulation of impact factors by editors of scientific journals. American Journal of Roentgenology, 178: 767.Google Scholar
  11. King, D. A. (2004), The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430: 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kokko, H., Sutherland, W. J. (1999), What do impact factors tell us? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14: 382–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kurmis, A. P. (2003), Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 85: 2449–2454.Google Scholar
  14. Lawrence, P. A. (2003), The politics of publication. Nature, 422: 259–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leimu, R., Koricheva, J. (2005), What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20: 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Monastersky, R. (2005), The number that’s devouring science. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52: A12. (14 October 2005; http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i08/08a01201.htm)Google Scholar
  17. Nussey, D. H., Clutton-Brock, T. H., Elston, D. A., Albon, S. D., Kruuk, L. E. B. (2005), Phenotypic plasticity in a maternal trait in red deer. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74: 387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Opthof, T. (1997), Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. Cardiovascular Research, 33: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Partain, C. L., Fullerton, G. D. (2002), Editor’s Note. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 15: 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rogers, L. F. (2002), From the editor’s notebook; impact factor: the numbers game. American Journal of Roentgenology, 178: 541–542.Google Scholar
  21. Rousseau, R. (1999), Temporal differences in self-citation rates of scientific journals. Scientometrics, 44: 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Snyder, H., Bonzi, S. (1998), Patterns of self-citation across disciplines. Journal of Information Science, 24: 431–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wong, B. B. M., Kokko, H. (2005), Is science as global as we think? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20: 475–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environmental SciencesUniversity of ZürichZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Animal Ecology IPopulation EcologyBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations