, Volume 71, Issue 3, pp 523–539 | Cite as

A longitudinal study of academic webs: Growth and stabilisation



As the web is continuously changing, perhaps growing exponentially since its inception, a major potential problem for webometrics is that web statistics may be obsolete by the time they are published in the academic literature. It is important therefore to know as much as possible about how the web is changing over time. This paper studies the UK, Australian and New Zealand academic webs from 2000 to 2005, finding that the number of static pages and links in each of the three academic webs appears to have stabilised as far back as 2001. This stabilisation may be partly due to increases in dynamic pages which are normally excluded from webometric analyses. Nevertheless, the results are encouraging evidence that webometrics for academic spaces may have a longer-term validity than would have been previously assumed.


Site Size Static Page Dynamic Page Webometric Analysis Impact Assessment Survey 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bar-Ilan, J. (1999), Search engine results over time — A case study on search engine stability, Cybermetrics, 2/3. Available:
  2. Bar-Ilan, J. (2002), Methods for measuring search engine performance over time, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4): 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bar-Ilan, J., Peritz, B. C. (2004), Evolution, continuity and disappearance of documents on a specific topic on the Web — A longitudinal study of ‘informetrics’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(11): 980–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bar-Yossef, Z. Broder, A. Kumar, A., Tomkins, A. (2004), Sic transit gloria telae: towards an understanding of the web’s decay, WWW2004 Conference. Available:
  5. Brewington, B. E., Cybenko, G. (2000), How dynamic is the Web? Computer Networks, 33(1–6): 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broder, A., Kumar, R., Maghoul, F., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Stata, R., Tomkins, A., Wiener, J. (2000), Graph structure in the Web, Journal of Computer Networks, 33(1–6): 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho, J., Garcia-Molina, H. (2003), Estimating frequency of change, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 3(3): 256–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chu, H., He, S., Thelwall, M. (2002), Library and information science schools in Canada and USA: A Webometric perspective, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 43(2): 110–125.Google Scholar
  9. Fetterly, D., Manasse, M., Najork, M., Wiener, J. (2003), A large scale study of the evolution of web pages, Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 669–678.Google Scholar
  10. Glänzel, W. (2001), National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations, Scientometrics, 51(1): 69–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guice, J. (1998), Looking backward and forward at the Internet, The Information Society, 14: 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hahessy, J., Carr, F., Forrester, N. (2002), Higher Education Impact Assessment Survey, Council of Academics and Professional Publishers. Available:$FILE/HEImpactAssessmentSurvey.pdf
  13. Koehler, W. (1999a), Classifying Web sites and Web pages: the use of metrics and URL characteristics as markers, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 31(1): 297–307.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Koehler, W. (1999b), An analysis of web page and web site constancy and permanence, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2): 162–180.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Koehler, W. (2002), Web page change and persistence — 4-year longitudinal web study, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2): 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koehler, W. (2004), A longitudinal study of Web pages continued a consideration of document persistence, Information Research, 9(2).Google Scholar
  17. Levene, M., Poulovassilis, A. (2004), Web Dynamics. Adapting to Change in Content, Size, Topology and Use, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Middleton, I., McConnell, M., Davidson, G. (1999), Presenting a model for the structure and content of a university World Wide Website, Journal of Information Science, 25(3): 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rousseau, R. (1999), Time evolution of the number of hits in keyword searches on the Internet, Post Conference Seminar — Cybermetrics’ 99 at the Seventh International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, July 9 1999, Colima, Mexico. Available:
  20. Smith, A., Thelwall, M. (2002), Web Impact Factors for Australasian universities, Scientometrics, 54(3): 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thelwall, M. (2001), A web crawler design for data mining, Journal of Information Science, 27(5): 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thelwall, M. (2002), Conceptualising documentation on the Web: An evaluation of different heuristic-based models for counting links between university Websites, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12): 995–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thelwall, M. (2002/3), A free database of university Web links data collection issues, Cybermetrics, 6/7. Available
  24. Thelwall, M., Tang, R., Price, E. (2003), Linguistic patterns of academic web use in Western Europe, Scientometrics, 56(3): 417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thelwall, M., Payne, N. (2005), Link analysis: An informetric technique, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI-2005, pp. 681–682.Google Scholar
  26. Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., Björneborn, L. (2005), Webometrics, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39: 81–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computing and Information TechnologyUniversity of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK

Personalised recommendations