Internationalization and evolution of application areas of an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology
- 420 Downloads
Nanotechnology patenting has grown rapidly in recent years as an increasing number of countries are getting into the global nanotechnology race. Using a refined methodology to identify and classify nanotechnology patents, this paper analyses the changing pattern of internationalization of nanotechnology patenting activities from 1976–2004. We show that the dominance of the G5 countries have declined in recent years, not only in terms of quantity, but also in terms of quality as measured by citation indicators. In addition, using a new approach to classifying the intended areas of commercial applications, we show that nanotechnology patenting initially emphasized instrumentation, but exhibited greater diversification to other application areas in recent years. Significant differences in application area specialization are also found among major nanotechnology nations. Moreover, universities are found to play a significant and increasing role in patenting, particularly in US, UK and Canada.
KeywordsApplication Area Patent Citation Institutional Ownership Revealed Comparative Advantage Nanotechnology Patent
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adelman, D. E., DeAngelis, K. L. (2007), Patent metrics: The mismeasure of innovation in the biotech patent debate, Texas Law Review, forthcoming.Google Scholar
- Bawa, R. (2004). Nanotechnology patenting in the US, Nanotechnology Law and Business, 1: 31–50.Google Scholar
- Darby, M. R., Zucker, L. G. (2003), Grilichesian breakthroughs: Inventions of methods of inventing and firm entry in nanotechnology, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 9825.Google Scholar
- Darby, M. R., Zucker, L. G. (2004), Formation and transformation of industries: Nanotechnology, chapter 2 in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Opportunities and Challenges in California, Sacramento, CA: California Council on Science and Technology. Downloaded from http://www.ccst.us/ccst/pubs/nano/NanoReport.pdf Google Scholar
- Holister, P. (2002), Nanotech: the tiny revolution. CMP Cientifica.Google Scholar
- Lemley, M. A. (2005). Patenting nanotechnology, Stanford Law Review, 61: 601–630.Google Scholar
- Miller, J. C., Serrato, R., Represas-Cardenas, J. M., Kundahl, G. (2005), The Handbook Of Nanotechnology: Business, Policy, And Intellectual Property Law 224, John Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
- Sampat, B. N., (2004) Examining Patent Examination: An Analysis of Examiner and Applicant Generated Prior Art, Haas Business School Working Paper, downloaded from http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/wakeman/ba297tspring05/Sampat.pdf
- Trajtenberg, M., Jaffe, A., Henderson, R (1997). University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5(1): 19–50.Google Scholar